Its stupid because you actually don't refer to any ACTUAL things I say! Also you are not actually engaging with me at all. You are just spitting out vile, ignorant and abusive opinion!!

Name calling is not engaging in anything except abuse!! Being abusive is clearly stupid behaviour- work it out!!!!

Your post above speaks volumes about modern day football support and the effect of the dirty Russian's money on your club.

I know you wouldn't believe it, as a large proportion of your fellow supporters are plastics, but yes - our support is unequivocal regardless of opposition. The only difference might be the size of the crowd, but
the noise is there.

Long time since it was like that at the Bridge, isn't it, where Palace fans outsang you last year. Well done with all the trophies though, even if your club is long dead.

Goodness is what you do. Not who you pray to.

Yawn- we out sang Barcelona Fans in the Nou Camp in 2012. I was there! So what?

As for the dirty money jibe!! Been through this BUT you were happy to take it some years a go when we gave you all the money for a pre-season friendly!!
Also GAC?!?! Remember them? How do they make there money?

Edited by chelski (12 Nov 2014 10.47am)

Edited by chelski (12 Nov 2014 10.47am)

To your first point, it means that Barca have more plastic fans than Chelsea. Doesn't mean your sh*t don't smell.

To your 2nd point, you gave us nothing, you refused to take any proportion of the gate money from the overall receipts. There is a difference between us taking your money and you not taking ours.

To your 3rd point, GAC are a logistics company. They make money from logistics. What's your point?

Frankly, you were doing quite well in the first few posts of this thread, but you're becoming a bit tedious now.

Goodness is what you do. Not who you pray to.

1. Can you provide any evidence of unethical practice by GAC? I'd be very interested. In any event, that's akin to my casting aspersions on Samsung, and we're talking about owners, not sponsors.

2. You could prospectively be owned by the world's biggest drug cartel, but you aren't. Let's keep things real, eh? Come back and gripe if we are taken over and if the new owner has any ethical problems, OK?

Goodness is what you do. Not who you pray to.

I actually haven't suggested that GAC have been unethical in any practices. What I have said is that they earn their money from transporting gas/oil! The point is, and I have made this throughout the thread, that capitalist businesses make money and most will trade and secure contracts using as many means as possible. No one has produced any evidence that Abramovich was anything different than any other capitalist who exploits situations and markets to get the best deals.
His money was made in oil and gas. I expect(but can not be sure) that it was the same oil and gas GAC transported!
In the world we live in I doubt greatly that any company behaves ethically in all its dealings and that if you delved in to most companies questions could be asked about their ethical practices. Palace fans shout dirty money very easily at Chelsea BUT have never bothered to actually produce proof of this or shown the slightest interest in investigating the practices of their own sponsors and owners.
The problem with political statements and banners is that you open the proverbial can of worms.
Your potential new owners buy, break up and and sell companies I understand, but correct me if I am wrong?