You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 24 2024 2.36pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 62 of 311 < 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 >

Topic Locked

legaleagle Flag 18 May 14 7.41pm

Quote Jimenez at 18 May 2014 2.20pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm

Yes, lets follow the US libertarian model of trying to eradicate the state when it comes to provision of services for the many, but not forgetting to maximise government support for the most wealthy in the form of huge tax breaks and federal funds for military spending and big business!


Your going to have to do better than that? I'm talking about an overblown behemoth which needs trimming. That includes the UK. Do we really need 650 odd MPs.?


Actually, your point, in my opinion, illustrates why so much "anti statist" rhetoric is another example of inappropriately blaming something abstract for a country's woes. The fact we have 635 MP's is a really good thing rather than a negative, ie linking the representative to a relatively small number of voters directly,and the constituency system aids this. The problem is the bankruptcy of the main parties and the moral corruption of the political class. But, say, halving the number of MP's would simply make the elected representatives even more remote from the voters.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
matt_himself Flag Matataland 18 May 14 7.46pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 7.24pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 7.19pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.15pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm

What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point:


The Sun [Link]

Daily Mail [Link]

The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support.

It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it.

The press are supporting their mates.

I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement.

-> [Link]


Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm)

Please describe what 'notoriously xenophobic' is.

Thank you.

As I said previously I dont wish to talk with you because apparently it all becomes about you and to hell with the thread. I'd rather discuss the issues and I have a right to decide who I communicate with. It's non question to begin with anyway. Accusing the Daily Mail and The Sun of being xenophobic is about as controversial as accusing The Guardian of being 'right on'. Last reply to you. Thanks.

No. It is not a 'non question'.

You have stated that the Daily Mail and The Sun are xenophpbic. I am asking you to provide evidence of this.

How controvesial is that? It shouldn't be for someone as confident as you are in delivering a message.

Bring it on, sweet cheeks.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
legaleagle Flag 18 May 14 7.57pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 May 2014 1.37pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 12.09pm

Being "anti-EU" has come to encapsulate a code for being disatisfied with life and seeking a convenient "other" to blame it on....Hence, UKIP's mass appeal....as a protest vote.

Maybe its the EU's fault our taxi drivers don't wear uniforms as per UKIP's manifesto at the last elections?!

Blaming all woes on the EU very neatly incorporates many of the "others" people have sought to blame their/"our" woes on over the past few decades: economic decline post empire, loss of Empire, immigration, multi-culturalism.

The EU is very far from perfect (what is?) but, I suspect we need it more than vice versa and if people think leaving would lead to anything other than economic disaster, I fear they are living in dreamland...The figures recently published about how many from Romania and Bulgaria actually chose to come here post 1 January 2014 says it all about the gap between reality and the culture of blaming/fear of the outsider "other" we inhabit.

Go to former Yugoslavia, for example, and you get a stark view of the very real benefits to all (including us) of the EU existing.

Will be interesting to see re next year's general election, if UKIP can sustain their place as a receptacle of the general protest vote...ie all we need for everything in the UK to be hunky dory is no more immigrants and get out of the EU.


This post incorporates not only a caricature of your perception of a Ukip voter and their motivations but for good measure you produce the rather obvious statement that poor countries that get a standard of living boost tend to like the EU.

Errr....Wow, how surprising.

There are only three net contributors to the EU of which we are one....I'm not bleeding surprised poor countries are chuffed.

Your caricature of a Ukip voter is simplistic and certainly doesn't speak for me. I most certainly don't blame the EU for everything but they do share blame for the financial crises (creation of a system that couldn't live with a financial shock).....But on that score they are just typical of politicians everywhere.

The overreach and mistakes the EU makes are really another thread so I won't list them here.

Officially Ukip spoke of projected figures that were possible and still are...The legal agreement Labour signed means any EU citizen can live here (I oppose this...There should be a cap)..The fact that you have gone with....once again with caricaturing what they meant actually shows your willingness to replace reality with half truths.

When I referred to former Yugoslavia, I was actually getting at the benefits of the rule of law and the reduction of nationalism...Its quite a good thing there have been no major wars in W Europe for 70 years or so, isn't it?There, many see EU "restrictions" and "diktats" as something positive, ie health and safety protections, data protection laws,judicial reforms, and at least some banking regulation.Sorry if that interfers too much with the stereotype of "Johnny Foreigner" only seeking monetary gain as soon as we are not looking...

When we speak of "net contributors", lets not overlook the massive contribution to our economy of tariff free access within the EU area. Plus having a bit more clout in world affairs as a part of the EU (ie in trade negotiations with the USA) than alone...

Our financial crisis was in large part due to Maggie and co's deregulation of the financial sector in the 1980's..as a result, and because of having the City as a major world financial centre, we'd have been exposed regardless of the EU...so another example of something blamed on the EU..

Why is immigration seen as such an explanatory factor for all our woes (and consistently has been in some quarters for 100 years)?Shall we call for the repatriation of all the hundreds of thousands of Brits happily now living in EU countries, or is that different because, to paraphrase Mr Farage, they like Germans are ok neighbours whereas Romanians are not...


I accept it may well be you are not the archetypal UKIP voter I admittedly caricatured.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
legaleagle Flag 18 May 14 8.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 7.46pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 7.24pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 7.19pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.15pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm

What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point:


The Sun [Link]

Daily Mail [Link]

The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support.

It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it.

The press are supporting their mates.

I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement.

-> [Link]


Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm)

Please describe what 'notoriously xenophobic' is.

Thank you.

As I said previously I dont wish to talk with you because apparently it all becomes about you and to hell with the thread. I'd rather discuss the issues and I have a right to decide who I communicate with. It's non question to begin with anyway. Accusing the Daily Mail and The Sun of being xenophobic is about as controversial as accusing The Guardian of being 'right on'. Last reply to you. Thanks.

No. It is not a 'non question'.

You have stated that the Daily Mail and The Sun are xenophpbic. I am asking you to provide evidence of this.

How controvesial is that? It shouldn't be for someone as confident as you are in delivering a message.

Bring it on, sweet cheeks.


As a non-involved in your particular discourse third party, perhaps review coverage in the Mail and the Sun Sept-Dec 2013 re the number of Romanians and Bulgarians about to swamp our country and the seeming view of the national characteristics of their citizens one might have got from reading such coverage?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 8.33pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 7.57pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 May 2014 1.37pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 12.09pm

Being "anti-EU" has come to encapsulate a code for being disatisfied with life and seeking a convenient "other" to blame it on....Hence, UKIP's mass appeal....as a protest vote.

Maybe its the EU's fault our taxi drivers don't wear uniforms as per UKIP's manifesto at the last elections?!

Blaming all woes on the EU very neatly incorporates many of the "others" people have sought to blame their/"our" woes on over the past few decades: economic decline post empire, loss of Empire, immigration, multi-culturalism.

The EU is very far from perfect (what is?) but, I suspect we need it more than vice versa and if people think leaving would lead to anything other than economic disaster, I fear they are living in dreamland...The figures recently published about how many from Romania and Bulgaria actually chose to come here post 1 January 2014 says it all about the gap between reality and the culture of blaming/fear of the outsider "other" we inhabit.

Go to former Yugoslavia, for example, and you get a stark view of the very real benefits to all (including us) of the EU existing.

Will be interesting to see re next year's general election, if UKIP can sustain their place as a receptacle of the general protest vote...ie all we need for everything in the UK to be hunky dory is no more immigrants and get out of the EU.


This post incorporates not only a caricature of your perception of a Ukip voter and their motivations but for good measure you produce the rather obvious statement that poor countries that get a standard of living boost tend to like the EU.

Errr....Wow, how surprising.

There are only three net contributors to the EU of which we are one....I'm not bleeding surprised poor countries are chuffed.

Your caricature of a Ukip voter is simplistic and certainly doesn't speak for me. I most certainly don't blame the EU for everything but they do share blame for the financial crises (creation of a system that couldn't live with a financial shock).....But on that score they are just typical of politicians everywhere.

The overreach and mistakes the EU makes are really another thread so I won't list them here.

Officially Ukip spoke of projected figures that were possible and still are...The legal agreement Labour signed means any EU citizen can live here (I oppose this...There should be a cap)..The fact that you have gone with....once again with caricaturing what they meant actually shows your willingness to replace reality with half truths.

When I referred to former Yugoslavia, I was actually getting at the benefits of the rule of law and the reduction of nationalism...Its quite a good thing there have been no major wars in W Europe for 70 years or so, isn't it?There, many see EU "restrictions" and "diktats" as something positive, ie health and safety protections, data protection laws,judicial reforms, and at least some banking regulation.Sorry if that interfers too much with the stereotype of "Johnny Foreigner" only seeking monetary gain as soon as we are not looking...

When we speak of "net contributors", lets not overlook the massive contribution to our economy of tariff free access within the EU area. Plus having a bit more clout in world affairs as a part of the EU (ie in trade negotiations with the USA) than alone...

Our financial crisis was in large part due to Maggie and co's deregulation of the financial sector in the 1980's..as a result, and because of having the City as a major world financial centre, we'd have been exposed regardless of the EU...so another example of something blamed on the EU..

Why is immigration seen as such an explanatory factor for all our woes (and consistently has been in some quarters for 100 years)?Shall we call for the repatriation of all the hundreds of thousands of Brits happily now living in EU countries, or is that different because, to paraphrase Mr Farage, they like Germans are ok neighbours whereas Romanians are not...


I accept it may well be you are not the archetypal UKIP voter I admittedly caricatured.

Leaving aside the massive Bulkan Wars for now, just because there have been no major wars in the rest of Europe, why is that necessarily because of the existence of the EU?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 8.43pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 6.23pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 3.22pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 2.59pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.15pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm

Yes, lets follow the US libertarian model of trying to eradicate the state when it comes to provision of services for the many, but not forgetting to maximise government support for the most wealthy in the form of huge tax breaks and federal funds for military spending and big business!

So you prefer a government 'that knows best'; you think that countries cannot flourish and prosper unless people conduct their lives in the manner laid down by the higher wisdom of a little group of people - predominately men?

Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies.


Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.


like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.


what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?

No, I haven't, skipped through the sample pages on Amazon though - can't afford £28 for the thoughts of some pro-EU ivory-towered propagandist. Have read Enoch Powell's speeches and publications on the subject though - spot on as usual.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 8.45pm

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.


like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.


what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?


_____________________________________________________

We are of course better placed to set up or own health and safety regulations than having some Commissioner from Albania setting them for us.

If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.47pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Buzzcock Flag In an underground lair near Bright... 18 May 14 8.48pm Send a Private Message to Buzzcock Add Buzzcock as a friend

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.43pm

Latest ComRes poll

UKIP 35% (+1)
Labour 24% (0)
Con 20% (-2)
Green 7% (+2)
LibDem 6% (-2)


So much for car-crash interviews, UKIP are becoming the Obi Wan Kenobi of politics.
"If you strike me down I will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine".

 


In the woods there grew a tree. And a fine fine tree was he.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 18 May 14 8.51pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.45pm

If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.47pm)


And how do we produce cheaper goods? By using cheap labour. What demographic fills the cheap labour market more than others?
If you stop the workforce coming in, you stop the means of production...

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 8.53pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 8.53pm

Quote Buzzcock at 18 May 2014 8.48pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.43pm

Latest ComRes poll

UKIP 35% (+1)
Labour 24% (0)
Con 20% (-2)
Green 7% (+2)
LibDem 6% (-2)


So much for car-crash interviews, UKIP are becoming the Obi Wan Kenobi of politics.
"If you strike me down I will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine".

That's right, the more UKIP are demonised by the establishment the more votes they will get. You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 8.55pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 8.51pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.45pm

If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.47pm)


And how do we produce cheaper goods? By using cheap labour. What demographic fills the cheap labour market more than others?
If you stop the workforce coming in, you stop the means of production...

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 8.53pm)

Who said cheap? The market determines the price of a product.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
SloveniaDave Flag Tirana, Albania 18 May 14 8.57pm Send a Private Message to SloveniaDave Add SloveniaDave as a friend

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.45pm

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.


like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.


what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?


_____________________________________________________
If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.45pm)


Only in your dreams. Countries use tariff barriers to protect their own economies and always have. That means that we cannot compete if a country or trading bloc (i.e. the EU) places tariffs on our goods.

That is why the current GATT negotiations have been running for over 20 years without resolution and our ability to export to the US and other countries is severely restricted in a whole range of goods.

You are living in a fantasy world if you think we can just carry on trading with zero tariffs without accepting what goes with it.

It is perfectly possible to construct a reasonable argument for us to leave the EU but you do need some basic degree of understanding of the issues in order to do it. Unfortunately you are not demonstrating that capacity.

 


Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

(Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 62 of 311 < 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic