This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
ARGILE OLD GEEZER PORTIMAO 03 Jan 19 10.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ChrisGC
I don't hate Roy Hodgson, I actually back him as Palace's manager and think he's the right man for the job given the circumstances. I've commented previously on how the club is run, and how RH can be one dimensional. He hits his targets and has found his level. I challenged the believe that he was a successful England manager. He wasn't. He was a disaster for the (as yet) unchallenged facts: Harry Kane on corners
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 03 Jan 19 10.52am | |
---|---|
Well one thing I do blame RH for is for the number of teams that have had their worst game of the season when playing us . Funny that .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 03 Jan 19 12.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Elpis
Well one thing I do blame RH for is for the number of teams that have had their worst game of the season when playing us . Funny that . Some have though haven’t they? Last season we were playing teams at the worst time, whereas Brighton were playing teams at the best time. Let’s be honest, Burnley, Leicester and Cardiff whonwe failed to score against were all pretty bad. Chelsea weren’t very good either where our last 10 minute effort wasn’t enough compared to vs Wolves and I wasn’t impressed with Wolves last night either. Sure against Man City we can heap praise on Roy’s tactics and use of the team but in all those others the opposition were poor, of that there’s no doubt. I’d take that all day long apart from that unless we start taking teams on more or looking for a win before 80 minutes we’ll be relying on the opposition being poor or poorer to people win the points, although I suppose that’s the thing. It worked v Wolves and not v Chelsea so that’s 3 points from those 2 and 1.5 points per game, which is how we were sometimes on the right side of these fine margins Roy plays. It worked wonders last season but this season it’s been frustrating, and you cannot deny that last night could easily have been 0-0 or 1-0 to them so he’s setting up to ride the fine margins and hopefully stay up. Music to Parish’ ears if he doesn’t quit if Parish doesn’t provide transfer funds, but very disappointing for fans who go to certain matches or see that the Chelsea match was there for a point plus a push for maybe 3 rather than very little endeavour and maybe a half chance. It’s not pretty and it can work, but playing for that maybe chance carries risks and frustrates supporters no end to the point they start thinking is it worth being there if you can watch this kind of football and every game in your armchair.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 03 Jan 19 12.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER
We are a 2nd tier nation now (we were a 1st) so we’ll often be the 2nd best team out of 4 in the group in tournaments. Therefore 3 tournament wins out of 11 is terrible and given we’re the best or 2nd best in bigger qualifying groups I expect us to have a good qualifying record. It’s not something to wear as a badge of honour. We can beat the lines of Leichtenstein and Andorra twice.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 03 Jan 19 12.25pm | |
---|---|
I wouldn’t be surprised if Parish has offended Roy an extension. Whether Roy wants it is another matter. Parish probably has no idea who our next manager shouldvor could be and probably neither do the ex players by his side.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 03 Jan 19 2.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I wouldn’t be surprised if Parish has offended Roy an extension. Whether Roy wants it is another matter. Parish probably has no idea who our next manager shouldvor could be and probably neither do the ex players by his side. Probably several other people as well
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 03 Jan 19 8.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Probably several other people as well Gotta love predictive text sometimes.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pssguy 03 Jan 19 9.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
The corner taking thing was a bit silly, but there's a lot to say about camaraderie and this helped Iceland hugely as it did with Southgate's campaign. What helped Southgate's campaign was meagre opposition and a ridiculous media campaign. Just a reminder that England lost twice to Belgium, once to Croatia, overcame Colombia on penalties and scored an extra time victory over Tunisia. It really was pretty unimpressive
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tickled pink Cornwall 03 Jan 19 10.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pssguy
What helped Southgate's campaign was meagre opposition and a ridiculous media campaign. Just a reminder that England lost twice to Belgium, once to Croatia, overcame Colombia on penalties and scored an extra time victory over Tunisia. It really was pretty unimpressive Yes I agree, but we certainly would not of been one game away from a final with any of our previous setups.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 03 Jan 19 10.33pm | |
---|---|
Neither if they manage to bring in a quality striker this window. And a good no.10 would be nice, or even Moses.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rattus2002 04 Jan 19 1.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Some have though haven’t they? Last season we were playing teams at the worst time, whereas Brighton were playing teams at the best time. Let’s be honest, Burnley, Leicester and Cardiff whonwe failed to score against were all pretty bad. Chelsea weren’t very good either where our last 10 minute effort wasn’t enough compared to vs Wolves and I wasn’t impressed with Wolves last night either. Sure against Man City we can heap praise on Roy’s tactics and use of the team but in all those others the opposition were poor, of that there’s no doubt. I’d take that all day long apart from that unless we start taking teams on more or looking for a win before 80 minutes we’ll be relying on the opposition being poor or poorer to people win the points, although I suppose that’s the thing. It worked v Wolves and not v Chelsea so that’s 3 points from those 2 and 1.5 points per game, which is how we were sometimes on the right side of these fine margins Roy plays. It worked wonders last season but this season it’s been frustrating, and you cannot deny that last night could easily have been 0-0 or 1-0 to them so he’s setting up to ride the fine margins and hopefully stay up. Music to Parish’ ears if he doesn’t quit if Parish doesn’t provide transfer funds, but very disappointing for fans who go to certain matches or see that the Chelsea match was there for a point plus a push for maybe 3 rather than very little endeavour and maybe a half chance. It’s not pretty and it can work, but playing for that maybe chance carries risks and frustrates supporters no end to the point they start thinking is it worth being there if you can watch this kind of football and every game in your armchair. We’ve also played some good attacking stuff in some games and not been fully rewarded. Arsenal and spurs at home and Utd away could have easily yielded more points had we had a bit of luck or indeed a goal scorer. We certainly Didn’t setup just to stifle the opposition in those games and I wouldn’t say it was dull or boring. It’s impossible to play well every week, against Chelsea we had an off day and probably suffered from having played against a physical Cardiff side and chasing the ball continuously against a City team that move the ball so quickly. The criticism from some quarters that the football is dull and boring seems a bit harsh to me. Under Roy we’ve played some of the best football I have ever seen at Selhurst. The end of last season in particular where some of the stuff we played was a delight.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 04 Jan 19 4.45am | |
---|---|
Roy is the perfect yes man for Parish. At least for the next year or so we will have limited funds - what new manager would walk into that, having to utilize an inherited squad which hasn't really found its stride. I see Roy staying with us until a big player will be sold, to create some cash flow and then a new bloke will be tempted to come in with 70-90 mil to spend.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.