Topic

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 61 of 311 < 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 >

Topic Locked

matt_himself Matataland 18 May 14 5.40pm
Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.34pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.31pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.29pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.03pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.32pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 4.17pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.07pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.57pm Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 3.52pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.49pm Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm Yes, lets follow the US libertarian model of trying to eradicate the state when it comes to provision of services for the many, but not forgetting to maximise government support for the most wealthy in the form of huge tax breaks and federal funds for military spending and big business! So you prefer a government 'that knows best'; you think that countries cannot flourish and prosper unless people conduct their lives in the manner laid down by the higher wisdom of a little group of people - predominately men? Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies. Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm) A number of these 'assets' were effectively work nothing because of the work of your comrades in the sixties and seventies. Red Robbo destroyed the car industry in this country with his constant strikes. Same for coal, steel and shipbuilding. Check your history Gusset. The left have done their best to destroy British industry through the politics of envy. I think you've forgotten that I wasn't going to respond to you in this thread. But well done for making me smirk at your use of cliché. Do you ever read the stuff you post? It is left wing cliche heaven. Just like the post I responded too. I love it that you think 'assets' go to'politicians mates' yet you cannot substantiate this. You only said you wouldn't reply to my posts because I had you cornered by your own stupidity. I am glad history has repeated itself with this timid offering. Is there any call for this? If someone has an opinion, they have an opinion. Hurling insults about how stupid you think someone is doesn't seem very reasonable to me. Maybe you should just cut to the chase and start hurling expletives. Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 4.07pm) 1. I am not going to rise to this non-sensical baiting? 2. No insults have been flung. Just observations. 3. You joined on May 12. Why don't you man up and use your previous HoL monicker instead of this one? Are you the same person who set up the username 'Palaceoh' to try and wind me up? It's like a paranoid playpen around here. This is the first message I've even posted to you isn't it? Unbelievable. So you avoid the question, ask a question in response to my question and get huffy. Man up and use your usual HoL moniker. I can tell you with 100% confidence that I don't have a 'usual HOL moniker'. On top of that I don't know you from adam. Methinks the lady doth protest too much. I think you'll find you're the one doing the paranoid protesting. One comment to you and apparently I'm some kind of internet spy sent here solely to annoy you. This is no doubt boring for others and self indulgent on your part. It's an internet forum, mate. There's no need to burst a blood vessel. If it's affecting you so much I'm happy to block you if there's such a feature. Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 5.34pm) Should you have nothing to hide, why are you getting so huffy about being questioned about your recent yet spectacularly argumentative so-called introduction into HoL life? BTW, you ain't bothering me. Amusing me, yes, bothering me, no. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 18 May 14 5.40pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.34pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.31pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.29pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.03pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.32pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 4.17pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.57pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 3.52pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.49pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm

Yes, lets follow the US libertarian model of trying to eradicate the state when it comes to provision of services for the many, but not forgetting to maximise government support for the most wealthy in the form of huge tax breaks and federal funds for military spending and big business!

So you prefer a government 'that knows best'; you think that countries cannot flourish and prosper unless people conduct their lives in the manner laid down by the higher wisdom of a little group of people - predominately men?

Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies.

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

A number of these 'assets' were effectively work nothing because of the work of your comrades in the sixties and seventies. Red Robbo destroyed the car industry in this country with his constant strikes. Same for coal, steel and shipbuilding.

Check your history Gusset. The left have done their best to destroy British industry through the politics of envy.

I think you've forgotten that I wasn't going to respond to you in this thread. But well done for making me smirk at your use of cliché.

Do you ever read the stuff you post?

It is left wing cliche heaven. Just like the post I responded too. I love it that you think 'assets' go to'politicians mates' yet you cannot substantiate this.

You only said you wouldn't reply to my posts because I had you cornered by your own stupidity. I am glad history has repeated itself with this timid offering.

Is there any call for this? If someone has an opinion, they have an opinion. Hurling insults about how stupid you think someone is doesn't seem very reasonable to me. Maybe you should just cut to the chase and start hurling expletives.

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 4.07pm)

1. I am not going to rise to this non-sensical baiting?
2. No insults have been flung. Just observations.
3. You joined on May 12. Why don't you man up and use your previous HoL monicker instead of this one? Are you the same person who set up the username 'Palaceoh' to try and wind me up?

It's like a paranoid playpen around here. This is the first message I've even posted to you isn't it? Unbelievable.

So you avoid the question, ask a question in response to my question and get huffy.

Man up and use your usual HoL moniker.

I can tell you with 100% confidence that I don't have a 'usual HOL moniker'. On top of that I don't know you from adam.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

I think you'll find you're the one doing the paranoid protesting. One comment to you and apparently I'm some kind of internet spy sent here solely to annoy you. This is no doubt boring for others and self indulgent on your part. It's an internet forum, mate. There's no need to burst a blood vessel. If it's affecting you so much I'm happy to block you if there's such a feature.

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 5.34pm)

Should you have nothing to hide, why are you getting so huffy about being questioned about your recent yet spectacularly argumentative so-called introduction into HoL life?

BTW, you ain't bothering me. Amusing me, yes, bothering me, no.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 18 May 14 5.50pm
The TUSC massive rally against oppression: [Link] We can see the size of their support is huge and they have done a commendable job in rallying the oppressed masses to their aims. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 18 May 14 5.50pm

The TUSC massive rally against oppression:

[Link]

We can see the size of their support is huge and they have done a commendable job in rallying the oppressed masses to their aims.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck 18 May 14 5.58pm
Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.40pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.34pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.31pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.29pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.03pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.32pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 4.17pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.07pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.57pm Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 3.52pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.49pm Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm Yes, lets follow the US libertarian model of trying to eradicate the state when it comes to provision of services for the many, but not forgetting to maximise government support for the most wealthy in the form of huge tax breaks and federal funds for military spending and big business! So you prefer a government 'that knows best'; you think that countries cannot flourish and prosper unless people conduct their lives in the manner laid down by the higher wisdom of a little group of people - predominately men? Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies. Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm) A number of these 'assets' were effectively work nothing because of the work of your comrades in the sixties and seventies. Red Robbo destroyed the car industry in this country with his constant strikes. Same for coal, steel and shipbuilding. Check your history Gusset. The left have done their best to destroy British industry through the politics of envy. I think you've forgotten that I wasn't going to respond to you in this thread. But well done for making me smirk at your use of cliché. Do you ever read the stuff you post? It is left wing cliche heaven. Just like the post I responded too. I love it that you think 'assets' go to'politicians mates' yet you cannot substantiate this. You only said you wouldn't reply to my posts because I had you cornered by your own stupidity. I am glad history has repeated itself with this timid offering. Is there any call for this? If someone has an opinion, they have an opinion. Hurling insults about how stupid you think someone is doesn't seem very reasonable to me. Maybe you should just cut to the chase and start hurling expletives. Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 4.07pm) 1. I am not going to rise to this non-sensical baiting? 2. No insults have been flung. Just observations. 3. You joined on May 12. Why don't you man up and use your previous HoL monicker instead of this one? Are you the same person who set up the username 'Palaceoh' to try and wind me up? It's like a paranoid playpen around here. This is the first message I've even posted to you isn't it? Unbelievable. So you avoid the question, ask a question in response to my question and get huffy. Man up and use your usual HoL moniker. I can tell you with 100% confidence that I don't have a 'usual HOL moniker'. On top of that I don't know you from adam. Methinks the lady doth protest too much. I think you'll find you're the one doing the paranoid protesting. One comment to you and apparently I'm some kind of internet spy sent here solely to annoy you. This is no doubt boring for others and self indulgent on your part. It's an internet forum, mate. There's no need to burst a blood vessel. If it's affecting you so much I'm happy to block you if there's such a feature. Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 5.34pm) BTW, you ain't bothering me. Amusing me, yes, bothering me, no. Yes mate, sounds like it. I'll completely ignore you in future. That will soothe your paranoia. Be sure to do the same with me.
Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck

18 May 14 5.58pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.40pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.34pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.31pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.29pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.03pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.32pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 4.17pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.57pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 3.52pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.49pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm

Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies.

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

Check your history Gusset. The left have done their best to destroy British industry through the politics of envy.

I think you've forgotten that I wasn't going to respond to you in this thread. But well done for making me smirk at your use of cliché.

Do you ever read the stuff you post?

It is left wing cliche heaven. Just like the post I responded too. I love it that you think 'assets' go to'politicians mates' yet you cannot substantiate this.

You only said you wouldn't reply to my posts because I had you cornered by your own stupidity. I am glad history has repeated itself with this timid offering.

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 4.07pm)

It's like a paranoid playpen around here. This is the first message I've even posted to you isn't it? Unbelievable.

So you avoid the question, ask a question in response to my question and get huffy.

Man up and use your usual HoL moniker.

I can tell you with 100% confidence that I don't have a 'usual HOL moniker'. On top of that I don't know you from adam.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 5.34pm)

BTW, you ain't bothering me. Amusing me, yes, bothering me, no.

Yes mate, sounds like it. I'll completely ignore you in future. That will soothe your paranoia. Be sure to do the same with me.

Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck 18 May 14 6.04pm
----- Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.14pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck

18 May 14 6.04pm

-----

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.14pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 18 May 14 6.12pm
Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.58pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.40pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.34pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.31pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.29pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.03pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.32pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 4.17pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.07pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.57pm Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 3.52pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.49pm Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm Yes, lets follow the US libertarian model of trying to eradicate the state when it comes to provision of services for the many, but not forgetting to maximise government support for the most wealthy in the form of huge tax breaks and federal funds for military spending and big business! So you prefer a government 'that knows best'; you think that countries cannot flourish and prosper unless people conduct their lives in the manner laid down by the higher wisdom of a little group of people - predominately men? Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies. Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm) A number of these 'assets' were effectively work nothing because of the work of your comrades in the sixties and seventies. Red Robbo destroyed the car industry in this country with his constant strikes. Same for coal, steel and shipbuilding. Check your history Gusset. The left have done their best to destroy British industry through the politics of envy. I think you've forgotten that I wasn't going to respond to you in this thread. But well done for making me smirk at your use of cliché. Do you ever read the stuff you post? It is left wing cliche heaven. Just like the post I responded too. I love it that you think 'assets' go to'politicians mates' yet you cannot substantiate this. You only said you wouldn't reply to my posts because I had you cornered by your own stupidity. I am glad history has repeated itself with this timid offering. Is there any call for this? If someone has an opinion, they have an opinion. Hurling insults about how stupid you think someone is doesn't seem very reasonable to me. Maybe you should just cut to the chase and start hurling expletives. Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 4.07pm) 1. I am not going to rise to this non-sensical baiting? 2. No insults have been flung. Just observations. 3. You joined on May 12. Why don't you man up and use your previous HoL monicker instead of this one? Are you the same person who set up the username 'Palaceoh' to try and wind me up? It's like a paranoid playpen around here. This is the first message I've even posted to you isn't it? Unbelievable. So you avoid the question, ask a question in response to my question and get huffy. Man up and use your usual HoL moniker. I can tell you with 100% confidence that I don't have a 'usual HOL moniker'. On top of that I don't know you from adam. Methinks the lady doth protest too much. I think you'll find you're the one doing the paranoid protesting. One comment to you and apparently I'm some kind of internet spy sent here solely to annoy you. This is no doubt boring for others and self indulgent on your part. It's an internet forum, mate. There's no need to burst a blood vessel. If it's affecting you so much I'm happy to block you if there's such a feature. Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 5.34pm) BTW, you ain't bothering me. Amusing me, yes, bothering me, no. Yes mate, sounds like it. I'll completely ignore you in future. That will soothe your paranoia. Be sure to do the same with me. Interesting. You edit my response. I will enjoy picking up you on things in the future do wish you use your regular HoL monicker. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 18 May 14 6.12pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.58pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.40pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.34pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.31pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 5.29pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 5.03pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.32pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 4.17pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 4.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.57pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 3.52pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 3.49pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm

Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies.

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

Check your history Gusset. The left have done their best to destroy British industry through the politics of envy.

I think you've forgotten that I wasn't going to respond to you in this thread. But well done for making me smirk at your use of cliché.

Do you ever read the stuff you post?

It is left wing cliche heaven. Just like the post I responded too. I love it that you think 'assets' go to'politicians mates' yet you cannot substantiate this.

You only said you wouldn't reply to my posts because I had you cornered by your own stupidity. I am glad history has repeated itself with this timid offering.

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 4.07pm)

It's like a paranoid playpen around here. This is the first message I've even posted to you isn't it? Unbelievable.

So you avoid the question, ask a question in response to my question and get huffy.

Man up and use your usual HoL moniker.

I can tell you with 100% confidence that I don't have a 'usual HOL moniker'. On top of that I don't know you from adam.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 5.34pm)

BTW, you ain't bothering me. Amusing me, yes, bothering me, no.

Yes mate, sounds like it. I'll completely ignore you in future. That will soothe your paranoia. Be sure to do the same with me.

Interesting. You edit my response.

I will enjoy picking up you on things in the future do wish you use your regular HoL monicker.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 18 May 14 6.14pm
Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point: The Sun [Link] Daily Mail [Link] The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support. It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it. The press are supporting their mates. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 18 May 14 6.14pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm

What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point:

The Sun [Link]

Daily Mail [Link]

The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support.

It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it.

The press are supporting their mates.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck 18 May 14 6.15pm
Quote matt_himself ----- Move on. Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.16pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck

18 May 14 6.15pm

Quote matt_himself
-----

Move on.

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.16pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck 18 May 14 6.15pm
Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point: The Sun [Link] Daily Mail [Link] The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support. It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it. The press are supporting their mates. I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement. -> [Link] Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck

18 May 14 6.15pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm

What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point:

The Sun [Link]

Daily Mail [Link]

The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support.

It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it.

The press are supporting their mates.

I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement.

-> [Link]

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

SloveniaDave Tirana, Albania 18 May 14 6.23pm
Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 3.22pm Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 2.59pm Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.15pm Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm Yes, lets follow the US libertarian model of trying to eradicate the state when it comes to provision of services for the many, but not forgetting to maximise government support for the most wealthy in the form of huge tax breaks and federal funds for military spending and big business! So you prefer a government 'that knows best'; you think that countries cannot flourish and prosper unless people conduct their lives in the manner laid down by the higher wisdom of a little group of people - predominately men? Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies. Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm) I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible. like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree. Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'. what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you? Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand! My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. (Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)
Alert a moderator to this post

SloveniaDave

Tirana, Albania 18 May 14 6.23pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 3.22pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 2.59pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.15pm

Quote nickgusset at 18 May 2014 2.09pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 2.08pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 1.11pm

Or let's keep our assets as a nation rather than selling them cheap to politicians mates or foreign companies.

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.

like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.

what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

(Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)

Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck 18 May 14 6.43pm
Latest ComRes poll UKIP 35% (+1) Labour 24% (0) Con 20% (-2) Green 7% (+2) LibDem 6% (-2)
Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck

18 May 14 6.43pm

Latest ComRes poll

UKIP 35% (+1)
Labour 24% (0)
Con 20% (-2)
Green 7% (+2)
LibDem 6% (-2)

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 18 May 14 7.19pm
Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.15pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point: The Sun [Link] Daily Mail [Link] The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support. It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it. The press are supporting their mates. I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement. -> [Link] Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm) Please describe what 'notoriously xenophobic' is. Thank you. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 18 May 14 7.19pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.15pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm

What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point:

The Sun [Link]

Daily Mail [Link]

The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support.

It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it.

The press are supporting their mates.

I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement.

-> [Link]

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm)

Please describe what 'notoriously xenophobic' is.

Thank you.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck 18 May 14 7.24pm
Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 7.19pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.15pm Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point: The Sun [Link] Daily Mail [Link] The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support. It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it. The press are supporting their mates. I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement. -> [Link] Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm) Please describe what 'notoriously xenophobic' is. Thank you. As I said previously I dont wish to talk with you because apparently it all becomes about you and to hell with the thread. I'd rather discuss the issues and I have a right to decide who I communicate with. It's non question to begin with anyway. Accusing the Daily Mail and The Sun of being xenophobic is about as controversial as accusing The Guardian of being 'right on'. Last reply to you. Thanks.
Alert a moderator to this post

luckybuck

18 May 14 7.24pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 7.19pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.15pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 May 2014 6.14pm

Quote luckybuck at 18 May 2014 6.04pm

What do people feel is the reasoning behind the more notoriously xenophobic elements of the press turning against UKIP recently? Case in point:

The Sun [Link]

Daily Mail [Link]

The press you have illustrated support the Tories and UKIP are eating away at Tory support.

It has nothing to do with 'xenophobia' as you wrongly perceive it.

The press are supporting their mates.

I didn't say it did. I said that they are notoriously xenophobic, which is true. I was asking a question, not looking to be proved right or wrong. I'm not even in disagreement.

-> [Link]

Edited by luckybuck (18 May 2014 6.23pm)

Please describe what 'notoriously xenophobic' is.

Thank you.

As I said previously I dont wish to talk with you because apparently it all becomes about you and to hell with the thread. I'd rather discuss the issues and I have a right to decide who I communicate with. It's non question to begin with anyway. Accusing the Daily Mail and The Sun of being xenophobic is about as controversial as accusing The Guardian of being 'right on'. Last reply to you. Thanks.

Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 61 of 311 < 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

ukip (LOCKED)

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors