This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Apr 17 7.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Not necessarily. If they stay where they are we have savings on air pollution (mostly around Heathrow) and savings on diesel fuel polluting the sea/air if they travel by boat. By not coming here we are not forced to build homes and the infrastructure that supports them whereas their own countries already support their existence. Seems to me we are creating pollution and ruining the wildlife habitat of the UK by encouraging mass immigration? I have to question your pollution around Heathrow is higher because of immigration remark.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Apr 17 10.09am | |
---|---|
Damage limitation the way forward?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 14 Apr 17 10.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I have to question your pollution around Heathrow is higher because of immigration remark. On immigration... THE pesky ONS are at it again. [Link] Your remarks just go to show you are uncomfortable discussing anything to do with mathematics and logic.... Point 1 - Airlines schedule flights according to demand... they don't run them for the fun of it. Because of the higher and rising immigration experienced in these last 5 decades the Airlines have increased their flights to meet the demand... that is why Heathrow want another runway. Point 2 - You are being silly and reactive... point 1 above explains my logic perfectly with regard to immigrants. Tourists are another matter and the amount of unnecessary flying that a lot of people do these days having numerous overseas holidays does concern me yes... and our planet suffers from all the pollution as a result obviously. Please don't smugly dismiss my arguments when you don't understand them... my mathematical ability and logic is far superior to your own.... I have tried to get your brain to understand pensions in the past but you struggle with the concept. Stick to simple things that you understand.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Apr 17 10.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Your remarks just go to show you are uncomfortable discussing anything to do with mathematics and logic.... Point 1 - Airlines schedule flights according to demand... they don't run them for the fun of it. Because of the higher and rising immigration experienced in these last 5 decades the Airlines have increased their flights to meet the demand... that is why Heathrow want another runway. Point 2 - You are being silly and reactive... point 1 above explains my logic perfectly with regard to immigrants. Tourists are another matter and the amount of unnecessary flying that a lot of people do these days having numerous overseas holidays does concern me yes... and our planet suffers from all the pollution as a result obviously. Please don't smugly dismiss my arguments when you don't understand them... my mathematical ability and logic is far superior to your own.... I have tried to get your brain to understand pensions in the past but you struggle with the concept. Stick to simple things that you understand. How many planefuls of immigrants do we get a day?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 14 Apr 17 10.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
How many planefuls of immigrants do we get a day? As I said earlier your feeble brain is not capable of making the leap from the concept of supply and demand. Get a grown up to explain it you with mini eggs or apples.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Apr 17 10.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
As I said earlier your feeble brain is not capable of making the leap from the concept of supply and demand. Get a grown up to explain it you with mini eggs or apples. Are you saying that Heathrow are building a fifth runway because of immigration? Yes or no?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 14 Apr 17 10.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Are you saying that Heathrow are building a fifth runway because of immigration? Yes or no? You're starting to get irritating again and we are at the stage where I prefer to debate with others that don't employ your tactics and can accept at least some of what they read without resorting to repetition and other dodgy tricks. I'm off limits to you again I'm afraid before I end up spending hours going round in circles. You spoil it for everyone. Edited by Hoof Hearted (14 Apr 2017 10.57am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 14 Apr 17 11.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Damage limitation the way forward? Crock.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Apr 17 11.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
You're starting to get irritating again and we are at the stage where I prefer to debate with others that don't employ your tactics and can accept at least some of what they read without resorting to repetition and other dodgy tricks. I'm off limits to you again I'm afraid before I end up spending hours going round in circles. You spoil it for everyone. Edited by Hoof Hearted (14 Apr 2017 10.57am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 14 Apr 17 11.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
My last word on the matter... Obviously immigration levels will have an effect on the discussions about Heathrow/Gatwick runway debates. It's all about numbers... if we have less immigrants in the future we may not need extra runways, which will mean less wildlife habitats destroyed. I'm going offline now. Enjoy your Easter.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Apr 17 11.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
My last word on the matter... Obviously immigration levels will have an effect on the discussions about Heathrow/Gatwick runway debates. It's all about numbers... if we have less immigrants in the future we may not need extra runways, which will mean less wildlife habitats destroyed. I'm going offline now. Enjoy your Easter. You too. It's the first time in ten years I'm not at conference.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 14 Apr 17 12.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
My last word on the matter... Obviously immigration levels will have an effect on the discussions about Heathrow/Gatwick runway debates. It's all about numbers... if we have less immigrants in the future we may not need extra runways, which will mean less wildlife habitats destroyed. I'm going offline now. Enjoy your Easter. Heathrow Airport alone 75,000,000 passengers 2015. Net migration for the whole of the UK 295,000. I don't think immigration levels will have any effect on future planning from the airline industry, Hoof, nor from the Department of Transport, do you? Edited by Kermit8 (14 Apr 2017 12.11pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.