This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Feb 22 9.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
All those newbies buying up homes that the locals can't afford. Of course. That's the main reason. There is a big drive here to build affordable homes which have covenants attached to them on ownership only by people who have lived in the County for a while. Where I live has a mix of open market and affordable local homes, at almost 50:50. Don't ask me how they make that legal! So it's not as though the problem isn't recognised.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 09 Feb 22 10.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Of course. That's the main reason. There is a big drive here to build affordable homes which have covenants attached to them on ownership only by people who have lived in the County for a while. Where I live has a mix of open market and affordable local homes, at almost 50:50. Don't ask me how they make that legal! So it's not as though the problem isn't recognised. What the reaction have been if the rest of the country had kept housing for local people?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Feb 22 11.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
What the reaction have been if the rest of the country had kept housing for local people? They are built by housing associations and are "shared ownership" so a percentage owned, and the rest rented, with the option to increase the ownership in time. The housing associations are intended to serve the local communities. They also build open market homes, like ours, the profits from which help to subsidise their social housing. I don't know if similar schemes exist elsewhere.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 09 Feb 22 11.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
They are built by housing associations and are "shared ownership" so a percentage owned, and the rest rented, with the option to increase the ownership in time. The housing associations are intended to serve the local communities. They also build open market homes, like ours, the profits from which help to subsidise their social housing. I don't know if similar schemes exist elsewhere. There are certainly housing associations in London - people from within the borough might get priority but I don’t think others are barred from applying.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Feb 22 1.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
As for any connection to violence you just seem to want to make claims of a group that has no evidence.
Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Feb 2022 8.18pm) More likely talked into it.. Here, members of the group you support (Scotland branch of PA), essentially celebrate the activities of Brenton Tarrant [Link]
Several members flit between this and banned neo nazi groups. This mirrors multiple links between PA in general and banned terror group National Action, including high profile current members. National Action were banned due to celebrating the death of Jo Cox. They had changed their Website title to "Death to traitors, freedom for Britain!, a phrased coined by her murderer in court. One prominent PA official stated: “I want a cult. I want fanatics, people who are willing to die for this cause. That’s the level of commitment I want and expect" I could post countless posts like this concerning extreme links, and worldviews surrounding this far right neo nazi outfit. This group should not be allowed to become a political party, it is more likely to eventually become a prescribed group. I fear for what may lead to that happening. If you're fine with them pontificating about 'asking' my partner to leave our country on account of race, then at least own the realities and fullness of some who want to see that happen and why. Quote And Tim Dillon is also doing a show in London April 6th.
Thanks for the head up. I will be going to see Tim. He's certainly on the right, intentionally shocking at times and a free speech advocate to the hilt. He's not hateful though or attracted to anything politically out there. He looks at the absurdity of life and he laughs. For what it's worth I see your interest in these groups as 'rubber necking' rather than anything of note; the desire to be linked to something with a bit of meat on the bone. What I'm saying to you is that you can't sanitise away the more disturbing side. It is what it is. And what it is, isn't particularly palatable.
Consequently, as far as it goes for me in /politics..... That's all folks! Edited by BlueJay (10 Feb 2022 1.48am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 10 Feb 22 5.51am | |
---|---|
I had never heard of PA until I saw that post.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eden Eagle Kent 10 Feb 22 7.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
They are built by housing associations and are "shared ownership" so a percentage owned, and the rest rented, with the option to increase the ownership in time. The housing associations are intended to serve the local communities. They also build open market homes, like ours, the profits from which help to subsidise their social housing. I don't know if similar schemes exist elsewhere. Do you mean that you have bought a new property and that from the profit the house builder makes they then use some of these funds to subsidise some form of social housing in future developments? If so then this goes on with pretty much every new development in England with the developer funding some of the cost for a new school/library/bicycle lane etc or social housing. The difference with Cornwall appears to be that there is a local and open market?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 10 Feb 22 8.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
I had never heard of PA until I saw that post. I never knew my dad either.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 10 Feb 22 9.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I never knew my dad either. Excellent.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Feb 22 10.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eden Eagle
Do you mean that you have bought a new property and that from the profit the house builder makes they then use some of these funds to subsidise some form of social housing in future developments? If so then this goes on with pretty much every new development in England with the developer funding some of the cost for a new school/library/bicycle lane etc or social housing. The difference with Cornwall appears to be that there is a local and open market? I am not an expert on this, but I know that whilst many developments pay a levy, many manage to avoid it. It's the housing association's rules that determine who they will sell to. They, I believe, have charitable status and work closely with the local authority. Whether, once a property is 100% owned by its occupant, the restrictions still apply is unknown to me. They might be via a covenant, like tied cottages are. When I was last looking at the housing market here a number of properties were unavailable to everyone. You needed to meet residency requirements.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 10 Feb 22 2.27pm | |
---|---|
He should go back to shagging Edwina Currie!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Feb 22 2.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
He should go back to shagging Edwina Currie! His choice of women aside (although even that could be argued is better than our current PM) Major is 10 times the man Johnson will ever be. He has dignity, diplomacy, honesty and a genuine sense of service running through him from head to toes. Johnson is a populist chancer, without a shred of integrity.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.