Sadiq Khan

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Sadiq Khan

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 60 of 99 < 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 >

rednblue4eva Norwood 29 Jan 23 8.42pm
So let me get this right, my car (2014 diesel) doesn’t meet clean air standards, but if I pay £12.50 a day then it does? Nothing to do with clean air just a way of making money. And once everyone has a clean car what’s he going to do as he’ll lose his cash
Alert a moderator to this post

rednblue4eva

Norwood 29 Jan 23 8.42pm

So let me get this right, my car (2014 diesel) doesn’t meet clean air standards, but if I pay £12.50 a day then it does?

Nothing to do with clean air just a way of making money.

And once everyone has a clean car what’s he going to do as he’ll lose his cash

Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree Croydon 29 Jan 23 8.45pm
Originally posted by Far away fan Also we through a few car tires in as they will burn for a long time, clean air Khan go where your grandparents came from This is a spoof account, right?
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 29 Jan 23 8.45pm

Originally posted by Far away fan

Also we through a few car tires in as they will burn for a long time, clean air Khan go where your grandparents came from

This is a spoof account, right?

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 29 Jan 23 10.00pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 This is over-hype. It's not responsible and not necessary and offensive to run a polluting vehicle, you are damaging other people's health. London's air has been transformed by Khan, I had asthma for years thanks to London pollution. Vehicle emissions poison and kill if we must have them they must meet the strictest standards possible. There are inexpensive alternatives, electric scooters and bikes for example buses cabs, its only if your vehicle does not meet the required standard. Judging by your posts, I'm sure you must still be breathing in something funny.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

29 Jan 23 10.00pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by steeleye20

This is over-hype.

It's not responsible and not necessary and offensive to run a polluting vehicle, you are damaging other people's health.

London's air has been transformed by Khan, I had asthma for years thanks to London pollution.

Vehicle emissions poison and kill if we must have them they must meet the strictest standards possible.

There are inexpensive alternatives, electric scooters and bikes for example buses cabs, its only if your vehicle does not meet the required standard.

Judging by your posts, I'm sure you must still be breathing in something funny.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 30 Jan 23 5.00am
Originally posted by rednblue4eva So let me get this right, my car (2014 diesel) doesn’t meet clean air standards, but if I pay £12.50 a day then it does? Nothing to do with clean air just a way of making money. And once everyone has a clean car what’s he going to do as he’ll lose his cash Yup, said it myself. If he was serious you’d pay £200 a day or banned but it’s a cash injection from a tax. Although yours and my car 2015 diesel are possibly cleaner than some petrol cars post 2006 which are allowed to drive for free.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 30 Jan 23 5.00am

Originally posted by rednblue4eva

So let me get this right, my car (2014 diesel) doesn’t meet clean air standards, but if I pay £12.50 a day then it does?

Nothing to do with clean air just a way of making money.

And once everyone has a clean car what’s he going to do as he’ll lose his cash

Yup, said it myself. If he was serious you’d pay £200 a day or banned but it’s a cash injection from a tax. Although yours and my car 2015 diesel are possibly cleaner than some petrol cars post 2006 which are allowed to drive for free.

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 30 Jan 23 8.01am
Originally posted by steeleye20 This is over-hype. It's not responsible and not necessary and offensive to run a polluting vehicle, you are damaging other people's health. London's air has been transformed by Khan, I had asthma for years thanks to London pollution. Vehicle emissions poison and kill if we must have them they must meet the strictest standards possible. There are inexpensive alternatives, electric scooters and bikes for example buses cabs, its only if your vehicle does not meet the required standard. This is a spoof account, right?
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 30 Jan 23 8.01am

Originally posted by steeleye20

This is over-hype.

It's not responsible and not necessary and offensive to run a polluting vehicle, you are damaging other people's health.

London's air has been transformed by Khan, I had asthma for years thanks to London pollution.

Vehicle emissions poison and kill if we must have them they must meet the strictest standards possible.

There are inexpensive alternatives, electric scooters and bikes for example buses cabs, its only if your vehicle does not meet the required standard.

This is a spoof account, right?

Alert a moderator to this post

Apollofuzz On the edge of reason 20 Feb 23 3.34pm
ULEZ: More than 1m people outside London to be hit by expansion - report [Link] According to ONS There was 1 death registered in London in the period 2001 to 2021 which had exposure to air pollution recorded on the death certificate in either part 1 or part 2 of the death certificate. This death was attributed to environmental air pollution, however we are unable to determine whether this involved car emission Edited by Apollofuzz (20 Feb 2023 3.34pm) I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat I wear my war time coat in the wind and sleet.
Alert a moderator to this post

Apollofuzz

On the edge of reason 20 Feb 23 3.34pm

ULEZ: More than 1m people outside London to be hit by expansion - report

[Link]

According to ONS
There was 1 death registered in London in the period 2001 to 2021 which had exposure to air pollution recorded on the death certificate in either part 1 or part 2 of the death certificate. This death was attributed to environmental air pollution, however we are unable to determine whether this involved car emission

Edited by Apollofuzz (20 Feb 2023 3.34pm)

I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat
I wear my war time coat in the wind and sleet.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 20 Feb 23 3.51pm
I was kinda hoping it was the wrong thread and lots of RIPs
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 20 Feb 23 3.51pm

I was kinda hoping it was the wrong thread and lots of RIPs

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 20 Feb 23 3.53pm
Originally posted by Apollofuzz ULEZ: More than 1m people outside London to be hit by expansion - report [Link] According to ONS There was 1 death registered in London in the period 2001 to 2021 which had exposure to air pollution recorded on the death certificate in either part 1 or part 2 of the death certificate. This death was attributed to environmental air pollution, however we are unable to determine whether this involved car emission Edited by Apollofuzz (20 Feb 2023 3.34pm) It’s a tax. Plain and simple. If not you would pay per kg of co2 not a set charge for a whole bracket. I wish a zillionaire would buy everyone within 20 miles of this ulez a vehicle which was free of ulez. Then the c*** would be stuffed.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 20 Feb 23 3.53pm

Originally posted by Apollofuzz

ULEZ: More than 1m people outside London to be hit by expansion - report

[Link]

Edited by Apollofuzz (20 Feb 2023 3.34pm)

It’s a tax. Plain and simple. If not you would pay per kg of co2 not a set charge for a whole bracket.
I wish a zillionaire would buy everyone within 20 miles of this ulez a vehicle which was free of ulez. Then the c*** would be stuffed.

Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 20 Feb 23 4.09pm
Originally posted by cryrst It’s a tax. Plain and simple. If not you would pay per kg of co2 not a set charge for a whole bracket. I wish a zillionaire would buy everyone within 20 miles of this ulez a vehicle which was free of ulez. Then the c*** would be stuffed. Nice idea cryst. A lot of people are forgetting, that the ULEZ daily charge of £12.50 is for all vehicles up to 3.5t incl motorbikes. All vehicles over 3.5t are subject to a £100 daily charge which includes Lorries/Artics, Single & twin decked coaches as well as single & double decked buses from out of the area. On top of the ULEZ charge is the Congestion Charge for central London & on top of that is the LEZ charge for all of Greater London of between £100 - £300 for Lorries/Coaches &another £12.50 for small vehicles. Kinda makes you want to out & drive in & around London really. This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13

On The Road To Hell & Alicante 20 Feb 23 4.09pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Nice idea cryst.

A lot of people are forgetting, that the ULEZ daily charge of £12.50 is for all vehicles up to 3.5t incl motorbikes. All vehicles over 3.5t are subject to a £100 daily charge which includes Lorries/Artics, Single & twin decked coaches as well as single & double decked buses from out of the area.

On top of the ULEZ charge is the Congestion Charge for central London & on top of that is the LEZ charge for all of Greater London of between £100 - £300 for Lorries/Coaches &another £12.50 for small vehicles.

Kinda makes you want to out & drive in & around London really.

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert a moderator to this post

eaglesdare 20 Feb 23 4.23pm
Climate change is just a reason to tax us more!
Alert a moderator to this post

eaglesdare

20 Feb 23 4.23pm

Climate change is just a reason to tax us more!

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 20 Feb 23 5.42pm
I think its just what the Doctor ordered. Provided your vehicle meets the ULEZ emission standards you do not pay, otherwise you have to clean up your act and Londoners inhabitants do not have to inhale your poison. Why are London Boroughs spending millions of taxpayers money opposing it, I think tfl can override them anyway. Mayor Khan doing the right, not popular, thing.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 20 Feb 23 5.42pm

I think its just what the Doctor ordered.

Provided your vehicle meets the ULEZ emission standards you do not pay, otherwise you have to clean up your act and Londoners inhabitants do not have to inhale your poison.

Why are London Boroughs spending millions of taxpayers money opposing it, I think tfl can override them anyway.

Mayor Khan doing the right, not popular, thing.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 20 Feb 23 6.01pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 I think its just what the Doctor ordered. Provided your vehicle meets the ULEZ emission standards you do not pay, otherwise you have to clean up your act and Londoners inhabitants do not have to inhale your poison. Why are London Boroughs spending millions of taxpayers money opposing it, I think tfl can override them anyway. Mayor Khan doing the right, not popular, thing. Go on then swampy. Give us the facts about Londons air quality. If khant had or does put tamper proof calibrated sensors all around London and the outskirts for say one year and put the results online; then put in the ulez for one year with the same calibrated equipment and actually prove a difference I will say fair play. Although if the results are negligible then I think you have the reason behind it. The question has to be why he hasn’t got this evidence or want this evidence. Do you not even want to question his motives ?
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 20 Feb 23 6.01pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

I think its just what the Doctor ordered.

Provided your vehicle meets the ULEZ emission standards you do not pay, otherwise you have to clean up your act and Londoners inhabitants do not have to inhale your poison.

Why are London Boroughs spending millions of taxpayers money opposing it, I think tfl can override them anyway.

Mayor Khan doing the right, not popular, thing.

Go on then swampy. Give us the facts about Londons air quality.
If khant had or does put tamper proof calibrated sensors all around London and the outskirts for say one year and put the results online; then put in the ulez for one year with the same calibrated equipment and actually prove a difference I will say fair play. Although if the results are negligible then I think you have the reason behind it.
The question has to be why he hasn’t got this evidence or want this evidence.
Do you not even want to question his motives ?

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 60 of 99 < 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Sadiq Khan

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors