This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Foxy82 31 Jul 24 6.07pm | |
---|---|
Disgusting nonce, I hope he tops himself.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 31 Jul 24 9.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
What an utter scumbag. As is the pervert who sent the images. What is worse, he was sentenced to 12 months suspended for 2 years. WTAF!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 31 Jul 24 9.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Just waiting for Wisbelch to post that Edwards pleading guilty does not mean that he did what he was charged with and that his mental health issues have mistakenly made him plead guilty, and that we should not leap to conclusions until all the 'facts' are known, etc etc etc.. Nailed it, like poor misunderstood Hunter Biden. That ignore switch can't come fast enough. Wisbelch haha, tips hat
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 31 Jul 24 9.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
What an utter scumbag. Agree
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Jul 24 9.59pm | |
---|---|
Perhaps it would be helpful if the BBC’s own report on this is read and fully understood. It seems factual and thorough. You might like to read what the CPS say constitutes “making” an image includes. It is so broad that it ought to be cautionary for everyone. Someone could send you something which you haven’t requested and have no idea what it contains, open it out of curiosity and find yourself in court. You might like to read this too as it adds some context. He has pleaded guilty., presumably on advice. His solicitor has hinted at the likely defence. Apparently when communicating with the man who sent the images he several times stated that he should not send anything illegal. He obviously did, but what Edwards did then could be a mitigating factor. As will doubtless could his mental health. It’s obviously hugely embarrassing for the BBC and no doubt questions will be asked about whether there was anything known internally. I guess the BBC will now conduct their own review. Edwards himself will now disappear from view. I doubt myself whether he will be given prison time given his plea, his known mental health issues and the hinted defence. Please don’t misunderstand. I am not in any way defending Edwards. Possessing these kind of images is disgusting. If he didn’t destroy them on receipt and then stop all contact with the source he has serious questions to answer.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 31 Jul 24 10.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Perhaps it would be helpful if the BBC’s own report on this is read and fully understood. It seems factual and thorough. You might like to read what the CPS say constitutes “making” an image includes. It is so broad that it ought to be cautionary for everyone. Someone could send you something which you haven’t requested and have no idea what it contains, open it out of curiosity and find yourself in court. You might like to read this too as it adds some context. He has pleaded guilty., presumably on advice. His solicitor has hinted at the likely defence. Apparently when communicating with the man who sent the images he several times stated that he should not send anything illegal. He obviously did, but what Edwards did then could be a mitigating factor. As will doubtless could his mental health. It’s obviously hugely embarrassing for the BBC and no doubt questions will be asked about whether there was anything known internally. I guess the BBC will now conduct their own review. Edwards himself will now disappear from view. I doubt myself whether he will be given prison time given his plea, his known mental health issues and the hinted defence. Please don’t misunderstand. I am not in any way defending Edwards. Possessing these kind of images is disgusting. If he didn’t destroy them on receipt and then stop all contact with the source he has serious questions to answer. Perish the thought!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 31 Jul 24 10.47pm | |
---|---|
Incredible, he is still trying to mitigate for Edwards. He pleaded guilty because he is guilty and will reduce his sentence.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Jul 24 11.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Incredible, he is still trying to mitigate for Edwards. He pleaded guilty because he is guilty and will reduce his sentence. Incredible? All I have done is provide the BBC’s response. Any guilty plea means the accused has accepted their guilt. What has motivated it remains unknown to everyone but Edwards and his legal representatives. Not to someone on a football forum! If any mitigation is going to be presented it will come from them. Not from me. All I have done is reflect on a variety of the things we do know. None of us yet know everything and we may never know everything, given the guilty plea. Only the magistrates hearing the case will know more. So I can no more know what his sentence might be than anyone else. All I have done is speculate whether, in the circumstances that we do know about, a prison sentence seems likely. That’s not mitigation at all. It’s merely looking at the way that first offenders in these types of cases seem to get treated. The fact that it’s Edwards involved should not impact that.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 31 Jul 24 11.54pm | |
---|---|
"Any guilty plea means the accused has accepted their guilt. What has motivated it remains unknown to everyone but Edwards and his legal representatives. Not to someone on a football forum!" Someone tell the pompous know-it-all that this is a nonsensical word salad. The motivation remains unknown..... not to someone on a football forum. If you believe a double negative has to be in a single sentence ,then the final sentence following " representatives " is pure nonsense. Whether or not Edwards shared his rationale for pleading guilty with his legal representatives is pure speculation yet put forward as a fact. Roll on the ignore button so such drivel is not read accidentally
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 01 Aug 24 7.13am | |
---|---|
Someone on here is talking Nonce sense
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 01 Aug 24 7.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
"Any guilty plea means the accused has accepted their guilt. What has motivated it remains unknown to everyone but Edwards and his legal representatives. Not to someone on a football forum!" Someone tell the pompous know-it-all that this is a nonsensical word salad. The motivation remains unknown..... not to someone on a football forum. If you believe a double negative has to be in a single sentence ,then the final sentence following " representatives " is pure nonsense. Whether or not Edwards shared his rationale for pleading guilty with his legal representatives is pure speculation yet put forward as a fact. Roll on the ignore button so such drivel is not read accidentally It is Wisbechian absurdity, half-truths, deflection and hypocrisy at its finest. There are no limit to the depths he is willing to plumb in support of the various degenerate goings on that he supports.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 01 Aug 24 7.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Incredible? All I have done is provide the BBC’s response. Any guilty plea means the accused has accepted their guilt. What has motivated it remains unknown to everyone but Edwards and his legal representatives. Not to someone on a football forum! If any mitigation is going to be presented it will come from them. Not from me. All I have done is reflect on a variety of the things we do know. None of us yet know everything and we may never know everything, given the guilty plea. Only the magistrates hearing the case will know more. So I can no more know what his sentence might be than anyone else. All I have done is speculate whether, in the circumstances that we do know about, a prison sentence seems likely. That’s not mitigation at all. It’s merely looking at the way that first offenders in these types of cases seem to get treated. The fact that it’s Edwards involved should not impact that. You really are the ultimate wind-up merchant. On another thread you are goading the membership of HOL for not condemning something abhorrent yet here you refuse to condemn a convicted nonce. But rather than just staying silent, you have to emphasise the mitigation for his disgusting activities.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.