Don’t do the crime and you won’t pay the fine!

That applies just as much to Yaxley-Lennon as it does to Donald Trump.

Y-L has hidden most of his wealth. There’s been plenty available in the past, and is now, for him to support some of the charities providing help to the victims but he doesn’t. He just uses their situation for his own purposes. No one should be fooled by him.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

If he would have kept shut about what he knew he would by now be off the radar. Ex EDL etc. but he hasn’t and isn’t keeping quiet. Someone’s liberty is worth more than a charity donation. What you are saying is that any girls who have been removed from these gangs or the gangs jailed is not as important as the said donation.
Shows what you pray to really. Are you harry enfield ?

Don’t be so ridiculous.

If he “knew”:anything then the first thing he should have done is shared it with the police. If they did not satisfy him that appropriate action would follow then he should have next contacted his MP and got them involved. If that failed then go to the media.

Y-L doesn’t think or behave like that. He considers himself a “citizen journalist” who is above such things. His purpose is finding stories which lend support to a much wider objective than the plight of the girls being groomed and how best to help them. He has tapped into a vein of hatred that exists in the lower reaches of the scuzzy hard right, which he first identified during his membership of the BNP and cemented during his leadership of the EDL. He has done OK out of this activity. Much better than working as an aircraft engineer perhaps!

Anyone looking at his history and attitudes ought to be appalled. They are indefensible.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Without over-riding compelling evidence for compassionate treatment I, and most others I suspect, agree.

That though doesn’t mean most cannot see the need for legal immigration, for job shortages, family reasons or for study.

Nor does it excuse the unconnected “anti-white shakedown” comment.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

In our representative democracy the job of our representatives is to use their own judgement to deliver what they believe we need. It’s not to do what we want. They are not delegates who take instructions on how to vote.

Our sole job is to choose who represents us. If we keep choosing representatives who decide to do things that any individual objects to then the reason is obvious. Not enough either care or agree with them. If they keep making promises that they then break because they know they aren’t actually deliverable, but need to make to get the votes, whose responsibility is that?

That’s representative democracy for you. Some are going to be disappointed and frustrated. Others grateful that wiser heads than the cumulative wisdom of tabloid readers, prevail.

Don’t like it? Go live in Russia and have everything decided by one man.

I won’t bother with refuting yet another outing of “The Great Replacement Theory”, with all its nasty undertones. Those who cling to its illogical straight line thinking are never going to change their position and will go on moaning as if that could help in any practical way.

They will just have to be ignored whilst the rest of us, whatever the origins of our forefathers or colour of our skins, will have to keep on working to find ways that everyone can be happy with. Nothing very new there.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 Jan 2024 10.20pm)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

And that representative democracy decided to offer the Brexit referendum and then to act on its outcome. Case closed.