You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > We need to talk about Michael....
November 21 2024 10.21pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

We need to talk about Michael....

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 17 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

  

Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 03 Jan 24 12.24pm Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by pssguy

I'm not sure it works like that. Once the release clause is met the player is allowed to negotiate terms with the club but if multiple offers come in that trigger the release clause he is under no obligation to go to the one with the biggest offer

Let's say his release clause is 60 million and Liverpool offers that. Man City counters with 70 and Man Utd with 80. Obviously, Palace would prefer United to prevail but Olise might think "Why would I want to join that circus without European football" and turn down City as they wouldn't agree to make him a guaranteed starter. Salah may have left Liverpool by then and he is the obvious replacement. If he gets something approaching Salah's salary that could well be where he ends up

If the release clause is 60m everyone will bid 60m, it is then up to Michael to decide which, if any, deal he wants to accept, Palace have no say in the matter

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Palace Old Geezer Flag Midhurst 03 Jan 24 12.56pm Send a Private Message to Palace Old Geezer Add Palace Old Geezer as a friend

I love the style of Olise's football and admire his willingness to stay with us this season although it seems most likely he will sign for a 'bigger' club (I hate that term) in the future.

But, am I the only one who who finds it difficult to see ex-Palace players in another club's shirt? When AWB went to United I willed him to make a mistake every time he got the ball. Even now, I hate seeing Gallagher play for Chelsea and he was only on loan to us!

If, as most of us believe he will, move on, I just hope Mr Parish holds out for the biggest pot of cash possible and a club record fee then spends it wisely to strengthen our squad.

 


Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
VinceHilaire Flag London 03 Jan 24 1.09pm Send a Private Message to VinceHilaire Add VinceHilaire as a friend

Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer

I love the style of Olise's football and admire his willingness to stay with us this season although it seems most likely he will sign for a 'bigger' club (I hate that term) in the future.

But, am I the only one who who finds it difficult to see ex-Palace players in another club's shirt? When AWB went to United I willed him to make a mistake every time he got the ball. Even now, I hate seeing Gallagher play for Chelsea and he was only on loan to us!

If, as most of us believe he will, move on, I just hope Mr Parish holds out for the biggest pot of cash possible and a club record fee then spends it wisely to strengthen our squad.

I totally understand your sentiments - and in an ideal world Olise would stay with us for years to come. However, football is all about money, egos and power!
Michael will go on to join a bigger club in the summer - and the money we get for him should help rebuild the squad.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
esox lucius Flag Deal 03 Jan 24 2.09pm Send a Private Message to esox lucius Add esox lucius as a friend

No details of Olise’s new contract have been released. But I do hope the club have inserted a large sell on clause, so we can get another payout a few years down the line should he move on again. I may be wrong, but don’t Reading get 25% of any fee we receive when he moves ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BelfastEagle Flag 03 Jan 24 2.14pm Send a Private Message to BelfastEagle Add BelfastEagle as a friend

At the moment I dare say Chelsea are thinking they dodged one…guy is continually injured. It’s hard to tell if the club are failing to give him the correct recovery time or if he’s just another guy that’s not up to playing regular football. Either way it’s very concerning.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 03 Jan 24 2.20pm Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Originally posted by BelfastEagle

At the moment I dare say Chelsea are thinking they dodged one…guy is continually injured. It’s hard to tell if the club are failing to give him the correct recovery time or if he’s just another guy that’s not up to playing regular football. Either way it’s very concerning.

With about 10 minutes to go of the Brentford game, I found myself thinking 'it's only a couple of weeks since Olise couldn't start the Liverpool game due to fears of stressing that hamstring and he's now playing 3 90 minutes in a week. We must be thinking about bringing him off?'. He then gets the injury right at the end.

I get he was on a hat trick, playing really well, and that Brentford were doing a little bit of threatening, but there has to be some intelligence amongst the management and medical staff in situations like that to manage a player who is so important.

Hopefully it's small and at worst he only misses the Arsenal game. If he misses Sheffield United, then quite frankly it's the club's own fault.

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Dolphin Flag 03 Jan 24 2.35pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Sounds like a 4-6 week injury to me.
This is a hindsight comment but he should have been brought off before the end.
Would it just have delayed the inevitable though?
Such a shame for him as well as obviously for us!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
MrRobbo Flag Chaldon 03 Jan 24 3.04pm Send a Private Message to MrRobbo Add MrRobbo as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

With about 10 minutes to go of the Brentford game, I found myself thinking 'it's only a couple of weeks since Olise couldn't start the Liverpool game due to fears of stressing that hamstring and he's now playing 3 90 minutes in a week. We must be thinking about bringing him off?'. He then gets the injury right at the end.

I get he was on a hat trick, playing really well, and that Brentford were doing a little bit of threatening, but there has to be some intelligence amongst the management and medical staff in situations like that to manage a player who is so important.

Hopefully it's small and at worst he only misses the Arsenal game. If he misses Sheffield United, then quite frankly it's the club's own fault.

Absolutely. Questions need to be asked of the depth of the squad, but also Roy's game management.

I suspect given the pressure, Roy will have felt like he needed to do everything he can to win the game. Disregarding anything in the future.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Canterbury Palace Flag Whitstable 03 Jan 24 3.29pm Send a Private Message to Canterbury Palace Add Canterbury Palace as a friend

Originally posted by palace99

Mirror are saying the new release clause is around £60m. Why bid more than that?


Still disgustingly low if true. They paid £82m for Antony.

 


We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 03 Jan 24 3.29pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by BelfastEagle

At the moment I dare say Chelsea are thinking they dodged one…guy is continually injured. It’s hard to tell if the club are failing to give him the correct recovery time or if he’s just another guy that’s not up to playing regular football. Either way it’s very concerning.

He played 37/38 league games last season. His last season at Reading he played 44/46 in the Championship.

This is really the first period in his professional career that he's suffered any sort of major injuries - I dare say Chelsea aren't silly enough to think a couple of injuries in quick succession are indicative of anything.

That's a very reactive take.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Palace Old Geezer Flag Midhurst 03 Jan 24 4.23pm Send a Private Message to Palace Old Geezer Add Palace Old Geezer as a friend

I must say, the latest news about his hamstring does not sound good. Both he and Eze seem worryingly injury prone.

 


Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pssguy Flag 03 Jan 24 4.28pm Send a Private Message to pssguy Add pssguy as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

If the release clause is 60m everyone will bid 60m, it is then up to Michael to decide which, if any, deal he wants to accept, Palace have no say in the matter

Yes that's true. The only bidding war is likely to be regarding his wages

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 6 of 17 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > We need to talk about Michael....