This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
kuge Peckham 19 Sep 21 4.09pm | |
---|---|
A Chinese invasion of Taiwan is I think very unlikely, It is just not the Chinese way of doing things. They are playing the very, very long game. That is not to say that they don’t want to give the impression that they might invade. In fact, that’s their entire point. They are following the ‘speak slowing and carry a big stick’ philosophy. Realpolitik will carry the day. The development of Chinese power in Asia is not something that they see being completed in five years, rather it is a fifty-year project. The same is true in relation to the investments they have made in Africa. Both in infrastructure and in education they know that the advantages will play out twenty to thirty years from now. They also know that the US does not have a plan that will continue much beyond the end of each presidency. Tens of thousands of Africans are currently being educated for free in Chinese Universities. They will go home fully engaged with the idea that China is Africa’s friend. And in general, they have made a much better go of being development partners in Africa than the west has. The Chinese will not tolerate corruption, they want value for money. So much of this goes unobserved in the west, China has been trying to influence Taiwanese politics for decades. Not that successfully as yet, but these will be the strategies they choose. The international isolation of Taiwan makes it clear that no one is going to stand behind them militarily. They won’t even stand up for Taiwan in relation to sport. If no one is supporting Taiwan how can there be a war? The AUKUS thing is just a bit of bravado and button polishing. China have no interest in a war in Taiwan. What would be the point? Oh, and why all the anti-French stuff. They have behaved honourably. Why should they not be pissed off that a deal was made and then broken?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 19 Sep 21 4.19pm | |
---|---|
If the West wishes to protect its interests in the Indo-Pacific, then France and other European powers need to be on the same page as the US and its Anglophone allies. And right now both sides are not even reading the same book. So basically the objective of aukus to give increased security and military protection in the region, has actually been undermined by this split. Who appointed the USA UK and OZ anyway, not other countries in the region itself most of whom have economic ties to China. It looks like by about 2010, Oz will have 8/10 new subs which will not be armed. So what. Looks like the USA and UK particularly have grossly over-stepped the mark.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Sep 21 4.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
If the West wishes to protect its interests in the Indo-Pacific, then France and other European powers need to be on the same page as the US and its Anglophone allies. And right now both sides are not even reading the same book. So basically the objective of aukus to give increased security and military protection in the region, has actually been undermined by this split. Who appointed the USA UK and OZ anyway, not other countries in the region itself most of whom have economic ties to China. It looks like by about 2010, Oz will have 8/10 new subs which will not be armed. So what. Looks like the USA and UK particularly have grossly over-stepped the mark. Australia is free to do business as it pleases. Originally a very big deal was made out of France getting the contract. The UK was snubbed. The French have not delivered and now Australia is free to dump them. A lot of the rhetoric on here seems to suggest somehow that China are the good guys and Britain, the US and Australia are sabre rattling. The simple questions could be: are China great, are the people free?
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kuge Peckham 19 Sep 21 4.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
If the West wishes to protect its interests in the Indo-Pacific, then France and other European powers need to be on the same page as the US and its Anglophone allies. And right now both sides are not even reading the same book. So basically the objective of aukus to give increased security and military protection in the region, has actually been undermined by this split. Who appointed the USA UK and OZ anyway, not other countries in the region itself most of whom have economic ties to China. It looks like by about 2010, Oz will have 8/10 new subs which will not be armed. So what. Looks like the USA and UK particularly have grossly over-stepped the mark. I agree if there is any hope of curbing China’s ambitions will come from an alliance of all the interested parties. Having two teams doing the same thing who are also not on speaking terms is exactly what they might have wished for. It’s almost like the people organising this stuff don’t think it through.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Sep 21 5.15pm | |
---|---|
Beefy negotiated the whole deal.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 19 Sep 21 11.47pm | |
---|---|
Where is the British military base in Singapore?
Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
Imagine putting a negative spin on Britain making billions out of this agreement. Britain has Military bases in Australia, Singapore & Brunei, we are perfectly entitled to protect our interests in the region. Closer to home it is again the uk & the us taking a leading role in reinforcing/training the Baltic states, we currently have a large presence in Estonia. This leads on to my next point, the British military are currently assisting France with the conflict in Mali and by Proxy were at war with Russia as Mali has been flooded with a motherload of Russian PMC's working against the interests of the french.
Edited by HKOwen (20 Sep 2021 10.52am)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 19 Sep 21 11.48pm | |
---|---|
2010? So these new subs have a time travel capability? Originally posted by steeleye20
If the West wishes to protect its interests in the Indo-Pacific, then France and other European powers need to be on the same page as the US and its Anglophone allies. And right now both sides are not even reading the same book. So basically the objective of aukus to give increased security and military protection in the region, has actually been undermined by this split. Who appointed the USA UK and OZ anyway, not other countries in the region itself most of whom have economic ties to China. It looks like by about 2010, Oz will have 8/10 new subs which will not be armed. So what. Looks like the USA and UK particularly have grossly over-stepped the mark. Edited by HKOwen (19 Sep 2021 11.48pm)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 19 Sep 21 11.50pm | |
---|---|
Now we are in complete agreement about Orange 1290 Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
You honestly dont have a clue do you? Edited by HKOwen (19 Sep 2021 11.50pm)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 19 Sep 21 11.52pm | |
---|---|
Like an independent Scotland and the EU Originally posted by Orange1290
Well, 'applying' and being accepted are two very different things.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 20 Sep 21 1.32am | |
---|---|
You are actually quoting Wikipedia not " the chinese " Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
Im directly quoting the chinese here, its not how I would describe you. You post purely on emotion which includes a weird hatred of Britain.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 20 Sep 21 8.39am | |
---|---|
France and Germany have been pursuing bilateral deals with China for 30 years. German and French car plants, none from other EU countries. Let's have no tears for France over AUKUS. The issue is French elections next year and this will hurt Macron, which is a good thing. Let's not pretend there is any European interest being pursued, only countries within Europe looking after their own interests. IMHO, anyone who would rather the jobs went to France must really hate the UK Originally posted by steeleye20
If the West wishes to protect its interests in the Indo-Pacific, then France and other European powers need to be on the same page as the US and its Anglophone allies. And right now both sides are not even reading the same book. So basically the objective of aukus to give increased security and military protection in the region, has actually been undermined by this split. Who appointed the USA UK and OZ anyway, not other countries in the region itself most of whom have economic ties to China. It looks like by about 2010, Oz will have 8/10 new subs which will not be armed. So what. Looks like the USA and UK particularly have grossly over-stepped the mark. Edited by HKOwen (20 Sep 2021 8.40am)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Sep 21 9.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Where is the British military base in Singapore? Similarly, where is the Australian base in Singapore? I have visited Singapore a number of times and never seen either one. They are both based at Sembawang, but are tiny compared to what used to be there. Ours has only 2 or 3 personnel and exists to organise bunkering facilities for visiting ships. I know because in 2018 I visited and had lunch with their officers at "HMS Terror". This used to be the officers club at our naval base but is now run by the US military who now dominate everything there. Sembawang dockyard, which was our naval base, is now a privately owned business in which we lease an office. I was there to lay a wreath on the memorial to the sinking of the HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse in 1941 by Japanese bombers. My father, who was on the POW survived but lost many shipmates. Security was very high, but I was given a tour of the dockyard and saw where the POW was berthed before its last voyage. The dockyard is huge, and we must have had a very significant presence there at one time. Not now.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.