This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Sir James Hird Mount Martha 11 Sep 18 11.17pm | |
---|---|
You clearly do not understand cartoons.They are to emphasise by caricature to ridicule society's norms. have a look at Trump, does he look like that.When he is shown in caricature. Well perhaps not a good example, but you know what I mean. USA has a lot to learn about racial tolerance, even now. I respect people of all colours and religion. It is the choice of a cartoonist to ridicule. Whats worse is the cartoonist has a wife and child who have received death threats.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 12 Sep 18 3.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
It’s a flipping appalling caricature. Genuinely horrible. How anyone can defend it defies logic The lips are particularly offensive. That it is racist is beyond doubt. The white and black characters are treated in completely different ways. Think 1950s America.
She has big lips....Mick Jagger has big lips.....I wonder how cartoonists have drawn him......But because she's black we get the call for different treatment.....we get the 'race' card. If you ridicule someone black it's because you're a racist....No other explanation....'protected class' based on race. Ladies and gentlemen I present to you a prime example of progressivism. Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Sep 2018 3.15am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 12 Sep 18 6.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
It’s a flipping appalling caricature. Genuinely horrible. How anyone can defend it defies logic The lips are particularly offensive. That it is racist is beyond doubt. The white and black characters are treated in completely different ways. Think 1950s America. On LBC yesterday an african woman openly said that lips were bigger on black people so that cant be associated as a racist jibe.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 12 Sep 18 7.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
It’s a flipping appalling caricature. Genuinely horrible. How anyone can defend it defies logic The lips are particularly offensive. That it is racist is beyond doubt. The white and black characters are treated in completely different ways. Think 1950s America. I think the point of a caricature is to exaggerate a person's characteristics for humour. Go back a few hundred years and look at the cartoons of Hogarth and Rawlinson they are very political and quite vicious. I don't remember the public being up in arms over Spitting Image's portrayal of Maggie and the Tories. As a Conservative myself I found them hilarious (And the vegetables? Oh they'll have the same). I think the aim of the Serena cartoon was to show her as a spoilt brat which I think the artist achieved. Some groups are very keen on equality well shouldn't that extend to them being ridiculed along with the rest of us? Edited by Badger11 (12 Sep 2018 7.47am)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 12 Sep 18 7.55am | |
---|---|
I don’t remember any uproar about this one.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 12 Sep 18 8.00am | |
---|---|
....or this one (etc etc) [Link]
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 12 Sep 18 9.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
It’s a flipping appalling caricature. Genuinely horrible. How anyone can defend it defies logic The lips are particularly offensive. That it is racist is beyond doubt. The white and black characters are treated in completely different ways. Think 1950s America. And yet the paper has republished the image with lots of other celebrities and politicians from other races. Attachment: E62EE466-3432-4C34-BE91-29701A9B32B8.jpeg (738.61Kb)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 12 Sep 18 9.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
On LBC yesterday an african woman openly said that lips were bigger on black people so that cant be associated as a racist jibe. And black Americans or West Indians will often have a large flattened nose, like she has, and has in the cartoon.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Sep 18 12.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
It’s a flipping appalling caricature. Genuinely horrible. How anyone can defend it defies logic The lips are particularly offensive. That it is racist is beyond doubt. The white and black characters are treated in completely different ways. Think 1950s America. A typically ridiculous response. Satirical cartoons are meant to portray features in a less than complimentary manner, especially if the tone is scathing. That sounds like 'racism' to me.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Sep 18 12.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
And black Americans or West Indians will often have a large flattened nose, like she has, and has in the cartoon. I find it funny when certain individuals take offence on behalf of an entire group of people. It's particularly amusing when they don't even belong to that group. Does this really need explaining?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 12 Sep 18 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
A typically ridiculous response. Satirical cartoons are meant to portray features in a less than complimentary manner, especially if the tone is scathing. That sounds like 'racism' to me. It is just a caricature, it is all context. However it may be funnier to, now, re-publish the cartoon with her with caucasian features. Let's see which one gets the most vitriol.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 12 Sep 18 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I find it funny when certain individuals take offence on behalf of an entire group of people. It's particularly amusing when they don't even belong to that group. Does this really need explaining? I don’t have an issue with it personally and don’t there should be one.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.