You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labour’s workers dividends plan
November 22 2024 8.05am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Labour’s workers dividends plan

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 9 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

  

croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 25 Sep 18 10.01pm

Originally posted by cryrst

I have read that a lot of peoole want or like a no commitment job.
Plus the wages are generally higher.
Loads of these employees couldnt afford to go on the cards.
This particular hot potatoe has been hijacked by do gooders wanting to be heroes. I dont see the actual people on tv saying they like the way it is as it would affect the antiestsblishment cause.
Your job is zero hours
How much do you think it would drop by if you worked for someone?

Its minimum wage now, times how many hours you want to put in, basically finished as who wants to work every hour just to take home a weekly wage, there are people who the zero hour thing works well for granted, but its been pushed into the job market for people who want a normal job but only getting offered these kind of zero hour jobs, its ok if youre qualified at a profession, but if youre not you are getting more and more dross zero hour gig shyte offered these days

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 25 Sep 18 10.16pm Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by croydon proud

Maybe penge, but what kind of jobs? zero hour crap, uber, not jobs with any meat on the bones! Its a race to the bottom im afraid, a race to the bottom!

Leftists think those who do 'zero hour' jobs and drive for Uber do it because they have a gun to their heads. They don't and both can work very well for people.

By the way, if you're not happy with the minimum wage, then what should it be?

Be careful what you wish for. You do realise that the more the government forces companies to put up their wages, the more they go towards replacing people with machines.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 25 Sep 18 10.27pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

Leftists think those who do 'zero hour' jobs and drive for Uber do it because they have a gun to their heads. They don't and both can work very well for people.

By the way, if you're not happy with the minimum wage, then what should it be?

Be careful what you wish for. You do realise that the more the government forces companies to put up their wages, the more they go towards replacing people with machines.

companies who can replace people with machines will do it anyway, i think the 10 pounds an hour mentioned at the conference is about right, theres lots of cream at the top that could be skimmed to pay for it! Did You know for the past 15 years, 4000 bankers in the city have taken home 1 million pound bonus or above at christmas? After the first year when they no doubt blew it on fast cars and boats, 12 months later it came again, so they just bought 4 flats for 250 grand each off plan, thats 16 thousand flats gone every christmas to bankers, times that by 15 years, you know why theirs no flats available for nurses to buy in central london or suburbs!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 25 Sep 18 10.51pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by croydon proud

companies who can replace people with machines will do it anyway, i think the 10 pounds an hour mentioned at the conference is about right, theres lots of cream at the top that could be skimmed to pay for it! Did You know for the past 15 years, 4000 bankers in the city have taken home 1 million pound bonus or above at christmas? After the first year when they no doubt blew it on fast cars and boats, 12 months later it came again, so they just bought 4 flats for 250 grand each off plan, thats 16 thousand flats gone every christmas to bankers, times that by 15 years, you know why theirs no flats available for nurses to buy in central london or suburbs!

I cant work out what you are anti in this post.
The earnings or what they spend it on.
They earn their bonus because of the benefit and profits they make for their companies.
Its relevant in that way.
Also they can spend it how they like or send it offshore.
How about the £500 000 they would have paid in tax on the £1000000 bonus. Thats more than me and you will pay in a lifetime
I dont think you mentioned that.
Just a point.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 25 Sep 18 11.06pm

Originally posted by cryrst

I cant work out what you are anti in this post.
The earnings or what they spend it on.
They earn their bonus because of the benefit and profits they make for their companies.
Its relevant in that way.
Also they can spend it how they like or send it offshore.
How about the £500 000 they would have paid in tax on the £1000000 bonus. Thats more than me and you will pay in a lifetime
I dont think you mentioned that.
Just a point.


Just seems a bit strange if they make profits, they get a million pounds bonus at christmas, if they f*** up, we bail them out, and you pay for their f*** up, then they start a clean sheet and earn a million next christmas, ever thought of that?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 25 Sep 18 11.59pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

The dear old Labour Party, started as a party for the working man & women now a sop for liberals, the middle class & loony racists.....

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 26 Sep 18 8.26am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by croydon proud


Just seems a bit strange if they make profits, they get a million pounds bonus at christmas, if they f*** up, we bail them out, and you pay for their f*** up, then they start a clean sheet and earn a million next christmas, ever thought of that?

Ive made this point before.
The money for the bail out wasnt taken from our pockets or the spending plan.
If they werent bailed out your pension or any other investments could have been affected.
In anyones eyes thats got to be right.
Ok then when someone is on hard times individually why should the social bail them out.
Its not my fault and its my money theyre getting.
Sod em. Thats a similar scenario on a smaller scale!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 26 Sep 18 8.36am Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

I cant work out what you are anti in this post.
The earnings or what they spend it on.
They earn their bonus because of the benefit and profits they make for their companies.
Its relevant in that way.
Also they can spend it how they like or send it offshore.
How about the £500 000 they would have paid in tax on the £1000000 bonus. Thats more than me and you will pay in a lifetime
I dont think you mentioned that.
Just a point.

But as recent history shows us it clearly isn't that way.

Look at the rail company bosses. They have been running unprofitable, shocking services subsidised by the tax payer, and still taking home bonuses!

Without market legislation they will do what they want. What Labour are talking about is balancing the justice from top to bottom of our society. If, after 2008, we all have to tighten our belts, it shouldn't just be workers experiencing wage decreases of near 10% while billionaires increase their share of national wealth. If automation makes for efficiencies and savings in the job market, we should all feel the benefits.

I was, until recently, on essentially a zero hour contract teaching role btw. How would you like your kid's teacher to not know whether they are working from day to day?

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Sep 18 9.01am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

I don't like the idea of zero hours contracts or limited hours because employers use it to bully staff.

At the supermarket I worked at no one was offered a 35 hour week. Your standard hours were 20-23 hours per week. The managers then used the promise of additional hours to "motivate" the staff. My friend started at 6am and worked until lunchtime she would often to asked to return that evening say 6-9pm. She needed the money if she didn't take those hours it was made clear she wouldn't be offered the better 2/3 hours at the end of her current shift which was quite often.

The problem with Labour banning zero hours though is that a lot of people like ad hoc working as it fits that lifestyle. So how do you square that circle?

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 26 Sep 18 10.41am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I don't like the idea of zero hours contracts or limited hours because employers use it to bully staff.

At the supermarket I worked at no one was offered a 35 hour week. Your standard hours were 20-23 hours per week. The managers then used the promise of additional hours to "motivate" the staff. My friend started at 6am and worked until lunchtime she would often to asked to return that evening say 6-9pm. She needed the money if she didn't take those hours it was made clear she wouldn't be offered the better 2/3 hours at the end of her current shift which was quite often.

The problem with Labour banning zero hours though is that a lot of people like ad hoc working as it fits that lifestyle. So how do you square that circle?

Zero hours contracts are not new.
They have been around for years.
When i was on the cards and working on building sites 30 odd years ago agencies always sent staff as required by the companies. A lot of these agency workers came for a day then decided it wasnt for them and never came back. Either due to workload or they had a better offer. They earnt higher wages because it wasnt paye.
I dont see how it is all down to the tories and a new thing to batter them about.
The concept has benefited more than it hasnt.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
becky Flag over the moon 26 Sep 18 11.10am Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Originally posted by serial thriller

But as recent history shows us it clearly isn't that way.

Look at the rail company bosses. They have been running unprofitable, shocking services subsidised by the tax payer, and still taking home bonuses!

Without market legislation they will do what they want. What Labour are talking about is balancing the justice from top to bottom of our society. If, after 2008, we all have to tighten our belts, it shouldn't just be workers experiencing wage decreases of near 10% while billionaires increase their share of national wealth. If automation makes for efficiencies and savings in the job market, we should all feel the benefits.

I was, until recently, on essentially a zero hour contract teaching role btw. How would you like your kid's teacher to not know whether they are working from day to day?

Look at all our MP's (all parties) they have totally s*** at running the country, but still took home 11% pay rises!

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Deleted11 26 Sep 18 11.14am

This is a broad statement, but, anyone who blames the Tories or Labour have not had the realisation yet that any party coming in; 1) has their hands tied due to globalisation. 2) Are mainly incompetent. In effect, we are really voting for the best of the worst rather than the best of the best.
Also, interesting fact. Since WW2, I think only 2/3 PMs did not attend Oxford Uni. Doesn't seem like a choice when one institution is providing all these LEADERS.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 6 of 9 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labour’s workers dividends plan