Well I did give 3 links which dispute what you are saying and I've no doubt the link you supplied will back up what you say. I'll give your one a read but I think we'll have to agree to differ.

Regarding the 100m sprint it is true that the winners have mostly black american sprinters but there have also been many white winners since the Olympics began.

Edited by johnno42000 (01 Sep 2018 2.00pm)

'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Thought I'd log in to this thread and impart some perspective, after all I actually live in South Africa and witness the devastation of the apartheid legacy on a daily basis. However, having seen the raw racism evident in some of the commentary, I'll leave it to the armchair Trump supporting experts

"Deviance is a freedom enjoyed in a city of lightly engaged strangers"

Hi Stirling, it's been a while! I still have your 'white flight' post just in case anyone might need reminding of your approach to issues a race!

"Deviance is a freedom enjoyed in a city of lightly engaged strangers"

You did say 'the 100 metres is continually won by athletes from genes from African locations is directly due to the fact that those genes are best for sprinting.'

I'm presuming you mean black runners? If so this is factually incorrect. For long periods it wasn't continually won by black athletes and for the womens 100m it still isn't won continually by black athletes.

'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

So I have to spell it out to you then.

Ok, we are talking genes here aren't we. The top ten fastest 100 metre sprinters in history.

[Link]

All ten males are black.....and I imagine all those genes come from the same genetic pool.
Eight out of ten females are black......the two slowest females in that list....nine and ten are white.

The same reality is found with the Marathon.....Genes dictate who wins and again, the African gene pool wins.

You seem to be under a significant amount of denial here.

I would have thought the reason for previous non African genes winning these events previously was blindingly obvious......poor access and in many instances no access.....as resources for competition improved the dominance continually increased with it.

Why do you think the UK does so well in the world of athletics for its size and population number of sprint athletes? It's because we are rich in comparison to many many nations and can afford to lavish money and opportunity on our athletes.

There will be numerous black Africans actually in Africa who never had the opportunity to sprint on the world stage but who could probably beat Bolt's times.

There will be very very few white athletes if any.

Genes are reality and social constructionism is a dead argument.

Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Sep 2018 7.49pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I believe what the evidence points to.

I don't believe in fairy stories because it's nicer.

I used to be one of those people because I didn't know better....the media don't advertise this information. They aren't interested in advertising the truth they only want you to know what suits their agenda and keeps them within the law.

So most normies just don't know about this. They believe what they are told.

Social constructionism has done nothing but lie and damage people.

No one is to blame for their genetics.

I think a lot of the problems are partly explained by this Feynman quote......it imparts the difference between people's preferenced ideas and reality....Instead of recognising their own flaws people turn away.

'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.'

Richard P. Feynman

Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Sep 2018 8.51pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)