You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Right-Wing are less intelligent...
November 23 2024 12.13am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Right-Wing are less intelligent...

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 14 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

  

CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 13 Jun 17 10.51pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by martin2412

You wouldn't call me a tit to my face so don't do it on a keyboard sweetheart.

As for Abbott being re-elected, thats not hard. The population of Hackney would vote in a chimp if it was wearing a red rosette. Very intelligent.

If you had said that in my presence I certainly would call you a silly tit.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 13 Jun 17 10.56pm

I'm less than impressed by Diane Abbott as a front bencher. I don't doubt she is a good constituency MP,But,imagine if a class A buffoon like Boris Johnson was subject to the same level and type of of critique as her every day...

Why isn't he but she is? Now,that's an interesting question

Edited by legaleagle (13 Jun 2017 10.58pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 13 Jun 17 11.00pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

[Link]

Abbott on form.


[Link]

Article about her illness and the campaign.


It's fairly clear that she is held to a far higher standard than others and vilified more than others irrespective of what she does. To me that's discrimination as the only reason she's treated differently is because of who she is. The right wing press and Tory treatment of her has been thuggish and dare I say it pretty unintelligent!

Another article about this topic written just before the election

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 13 Jun 17 11.01pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

I'm less than impressed by Diane Abbott as a front bencher. I don't doubt she is a good constituency MP,But,imagine if a class A buffoon like Boris Johnson was subject to the same level and type of of critique as her every day...

Why isn't he but she is? Now,that's an interesting question

Edited by legaleagle (13 Jun 2017 10.58pm)

Totally agree.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 13 Jun 17 11.14pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

I'm less than impressed by Diane Abbott as a front bencher. I don't doubt she is a good constituency MP,But,imagine if a class A buffoon like Boris Johnson was subject to the same level and type of of critique as her every day...

Why isn't he but she is? Now,that's an interesting question

Edited by legaleagle (13 Jun 2017 10.58pm)

Johnson has had his fair share of media coverage of his more head-scratching escapades. When he got stuck on the high wire springs to mind.

Ultimately, though, perhaps he just comes across as a more likeable kind of fella.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 13 Jun 17 11.30pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Kermit must be an exception then.

He's also schizophrenic he believes he's Scottish as well....

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 14 Jun 17 1.01am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

Totally agree.

Ah the 'progressives/regressives' and their 'discrimination Olympics'.

Personally I've always considered the criticism of 'insert person I don't like' for mis-steps in interviews as overblown and diversionary.

If politics were about electing the very best minds then it wouldn't be a popularity contest but an IQ test with expert judges. Of course ability is important but choosing your advisors wisely is more important than knowing the price of milk or whatever stat the media wants to throw at you. It's a circus and little else.

That said people are perfectly entitled to dislike Abbot without the rather pointless inferred comeback 'is it because I'm black'? Sasha Cohen was taking the p1ss out of that argument over a decade ago..... but we can always expect 'progressives' to like their 'goto' political clichés.

The point could easily be argued that the only reason Abbott has traveled so far in the Labour party is less to do with her ability and much more to do with her race....Which is racism to whichever person, of a different race, she blocked if they had better ability...Pick your angle but it's all the same diversionary argument.

Second guessing intent is pointless, better to deal with the actual points.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jun 2017 1.10am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 14 Jun 17 1.22am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

He's also schizophrenic he believes he's Scottish as well....

He's also for Scottish independence.....Except when he isn't for Scottish independence.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 14 Jun 17 4.39am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Problem is that the Marxists of Labour are using the Labour brand not the communist one.

The BNP aren't hiding in plain sight at the helm of the Conservative party.

They gain far more votes via tribalism than they ever would otherwise.

There's an inherent dishonesty.


Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Jun 2017 6.19pm)

There have always been Marxists in the labour party and its origins lie within Marxism and trade unionism. I don't see anything wrong with that.

Quite a few senior members of Labor over the years have been ex communist party members.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 14 Jun 17 7.24am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

There have always been Marxists in the labour party and its origins lie within Marxism and trade unionism. I don't see anything wrong with that.

Quite a few senior members of Labor over the years have been ex communist party members.

Perhaps they should publicise their communist links more then - no doubt many people would rally to the red flag. However, if they think Marxist policies will work here despite failing everywhere else they have been tried, they might be in for a disappointment. Meanwhile the 'intelligent' left will be telling them not to lose faith, just needs a bit of fine tuning, just need to get rid of all the unintelligent enemies of the people who are sabotaging the glorious plans as set out in the holy scriptures of the great prophet Karl Marx (blessings on his gulags).

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 14 Jun 17 7.30am Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Ah the 'progressives/regressives' and their 'discrimination Olympics'.

Personally I've always considered the criticism of 'insert person I don't like' for mis-steps in interviews as overblown and diversionary.

If politics were about electing the very best minds then it wouldn't be a popularity contest but an IQ test with expert judges. Of course ability is important but choosing your advisors wisely is more important than knowing the price of milk or whatever stat the media wants to throw at you. It's a circus and little else.

That said people are perfectly entitled to dislike Abbot without the rather pointless inferred comeback 'is it because I'm black'? Sasha Cohen was taking the p1ss out of that argument over a decade ago..... but we can always expect 'progressives' to like their 'goto' political clichés.

The point could easily be argued that the only reason Abbott has traveled so far in the Labour party is less to do with her ability and much more to do with her race....Which is racism to whichever person, of a different race, she blocked if they had better ability...Pick your angle but it's all the same diversionary argument.

Second guessing intent is pointless, better to deal with the actual points.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jun 2017 1.10am)

Haha, scenes. A lot of time for you completely missing the joke of an entire character.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 14 Jun 17 10.38am

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Must. Not. Respond.

A chimp would probably play better in terms of PR. Look a Bush jr and Trump. People now fondly remember the shaved chimp in a suit.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 6 of 14 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Right-Wing are less intelligent...