This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 04 Aug 15 11.46am | |
---|---|
Quote fed up eagle at 03 Aug 2015 11.05pm
Right, it's time to pull up the draw bridge, batten down the hatches. NO MORE IMMIGRANTS, PERIOD. And the ones that are here that aren't supposed to be need to be deported with immediate effect, end of. No more bleeding heart cr@P. And when the UK Finance industry collapses, we can all have a merry dance, given that the UK is entirely dependent of foreign business and investment. Ironically these companies tend to like to keep their employees in their company.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 04 Aug 15 11.47am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 04 Aug 2015 11.42am
Quote dannyh at 04 Aug 2015 11.36am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 11.26am
Quote The Sash at 04 Aug 2015 11.10am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 11.05am
Quote The Sash at 04 Aug 2015 10.39am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.20am
Quote Catfish at 04 Aug 2015 8.43am
Of interest, it would be helpful if posters could start by defining what they think immigration is. Are you talking about anyone coming here to live, whether legally or not, of any nationality and for any reason? If, on the other hand, you are talking about specific groups, nationalities, races, then please do say so up front. Saves so much time.
As are pretty much 99% of those here legally. Lets be honest they don't come here for the weather or our sandy beaches
For what its worth I totally agree on the asylum part - first 'safe' country you meet should mean that country have the obligation to grant you asylum and you take it or leave it. Edited by The Sash (04 Aug 2015 11.11am)
Edited by fed up eagle (04 Aug 2015 11.27am)
MODS i've seen this before in a two sided argument only one side gets the card. Not really rules for everybody is it Erm, I've had 3 yellows over the years.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 04 Aug 15 11.49am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 04 Aug 2015 11.42am
Quote dannyh at 04 Aug 2015 11.36am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 11.26am
Quote The Sash at 04 Aug 2015 11.10am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 11.05am
Quote The Sash at 04 Aug 2015 10.39am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.20am
Quote Catfish at 04 Aug 2015 8.43am
Of interest, it would be helpful if posters could start by defining what they think immigration is. Are you talking about anyone coming here to live, whether legally or not, of any nationality and for any reason? If, on the other hand, you are talking about specific groups, nationalities, races, then please do say so up front. Saves so much time.
As are pretty much 99% of those here legally. Lets be honest they don't come here for the weather or our sandy beaches
For what its worth I totally agree on the asylum part - first 'safe' country you meet should mean that country have the obligation to grant you asylum and you take it or leave it. Edited by The Sash (04 Aug 2015 11.11am)
Edited by fed up eagle (04 Aug 2015 11.27am)
MODS i've seen this before in a two sided argument only one side gets the card. Not really rules for everybody is it Erm, I've had 3 yellows over the years. Over how many years nick ? and its not just you as well you know. I've had at least three I think and well deserved they were, however it DOES take to to argue, take that little idiot Ghost eagle for example, loves to wind people up, but constantly evades the feared yellow. Me, I will always say what I want couldnt give a monkeys about a card yellow or otherwise, however in this case FUE shouldnt be the only one.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 04 Aug 15 11.50am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Aug 2015 11.46am
Quote fed up eagle at 03 Aug 2015 11.05pm
Right, it's time to pull up the draw bridge, batten down the hatches. NO MORE IMMIGRANTS, PERIOD. And the ones that are here that aren't supposed to be need to be deported with immediate effect, end of. No more bleeding heart cr@P. And when the UK Finance industry collapses, we can all have a merry dance, given that the UK is entirely dependent of foreign business and investment. Ironically these companies tend to like to keep their employees in their company. I suppose one daft statement deserves another.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Aug 15 12.04pm | |
---|---|
To be honest I think the mods generally get it right. Ghosty avoids swearing and that is to his credit.....Having annoying views is one thing....Our views will always annoy someone....But I think that as long as people don't over step the mark in how they address others...in other words swearing... then that's fair to everyone. If we let the swearing in...with the passion that exists, this place would become untenable. Some decisions are going to be borderline and I feel we have to give the mods that breathing space to give people a chance before bringing down the axe.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 04 Aug 15 12.06pm | |
---|---|
Let's move on from the benefits argument then. EU pays jobless migrants to come to Britain Pre-empting the obvious replies: I've no idea how many Brits were employed abroad through the scheme but I doubt it would've made economic sense for any of them to have done so, and I wouldn't imagine it applies to holiday rep jobs in Greece. It would appear our 'fair share' was exceeded somewhat in the same way that demand for residence here, legal or otherwise outstrips supply. Edited by johnfirewall (04 Aug 2015 12.08pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 04 Aug 15 12.06pm | |
---|---|
Quote dannyh at 04 Aug 2015 11.36am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 11.26am
Quote The Sash at 04 Aug 2015 11.10am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 11.05am
Quote The Sash at 04 Aug 2015 10.39am
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.20am
Quote Catfish at 04 Aug 2015 8.43am
Of interest, it would be helpful if posters could start by defining what they think immigration is. Are you talking about anyone coming here to live, whether legally or not, of any nationality and for any reason? If, on the other hand, you are talking about specific groups, nationalities, races, then please do say so up front. Saves so much time.
As are pretty much 99% of those here legally. Lets be honest they don't come here for the weather or our sandy beaches
For what its worth I totally agree on the asylum part - first 'safe' country you meet should mean that country have the obligation to grant you asylum and you take it or leave it. Edited by The Sash (04 Aug 2015 11.11am)
Edited by fed up eagle (04 Aug 2015 11.27am)
MODS i've seen this before in a two sided argument only one side gets the card. Not really rules for everybody is it Edited by dannyh (04 Aug 2015 11.46am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheJudge 04 Aug 15 12.09pm | |
---|---|
I wouldn't knock the card system. It might be subjective to a degree but it keeps things civilized. At least the mods here seem to be objective. The BBS should take note. Back on subject. I understand that the unrest in the middle east is a big factor in migration right now but that must not disguise the fact that the vast majority of people coming here are economic migrants looking for work.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 04 Aug 15 12.10pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnfirewall at 04 Aug 2015 12.06pm
Let's move on from the benefits argument then. EU pays jobless migrants to come to Britain Premempting the obvious replies: I've no idea how many Brits were employed abroad through the scheme but I doubt it would've made economic sense for any of them to have done so, and I wouldn't imagine it applies to holiday rep jobs in Greece. It would appear our 'fair share' was exceeded somewhat in the same way that demand for residence here, legal or otherwise outstrips supply. We should be paying jobless British people to relocate to areas of employment ourselves. The idea in theory isn't bad, its just that we aren't doing it, where as the EU is. It makes sense to employ unemployed people. The fact the UK doesn't actually do this is absurdly short sited and resulted in large scale working migration (cheaper but ultimately socially damaging). This is what WE should be doing, rather than a welfare approach that's 'spend the least amount possible and demonise the poor'
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sa_eagle Just outside Cape Town 04 Aug 15 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote fed up eagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.55am
Quote sa_eagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.35am
Quote fed up eagle at 03 Aug 2015 11.05pm
Right, it's time to pull up the draw bridge, batten down the hatches. NO MORE IMMIGRANTS, PERIOD. And the ones that are here that aren't supposed to be need to be deported with immediate effect, end of. No more bleeding heart cr@P.
I love Palace and I love being connected to other Palace fans but I hate how stupid some Palace fans are!
I understand exactly how ludicrous your post and position is, that's why I was making the equally ridiculous point about certain players who have benefitted fom immigration. Your nonsensical argument falls down when you begin to separate out those who "have come here because of work and they posses a certain skill" and the rest. How can you possibly judge people whilst you have your head so deeply ensconced in your Daily Mail?! I work with many so called illegal immigrants here in South Africa and without fail they are all very well educated and articulate people, one is even a doctor. Sadly however, this country has an even worse attitude to immigrants than you do, and these attitudes are then picked up by the man in the street who on several occassions in the last few years has taken to sticking tyres around the necks of immigrants and setting fire to them. It's called xenophobia and it seems to be rearing its ugly head right here on the HOL. Don't think for a minute that such things couldn't happen in the UK because they could. I recently met one of the local leaders of the xenophobic violence here, it turns out he's quite a nice guy at a superficial level (just as I'm sure you are). He has a decent job and a decent house, by township standards in SA he's doing well. He never though he was racist and had no real hatred of foriegners but somehow got caught up in the media fed frenzy and before he knew it he was organising house raids on immigrants and trashing their homes and beating them up. He's not proud of what he's done and he knows he's in a lot of trouble, but he also realises that he was totally wrong. The Ethiopian shopkeeper in a nearby township hasn't taken anyone's job, rather he opened a shop where there wasn't one and now employs two locals thereby creating work. The many Zimbabweans I know here all fled because they genuinely feared for their lives. Some of the women have been repeatedly raped by Mugabe's regime so they would rather risk their lives crossing a relatively safe land border (no desperate boat trips here) than remain at home. They would also rather face the wrath of the xenophobic violence than return home. I have a few friends from the DRC who will tell you that if they were forced to return to their homes they would kill themselves because they are so scared. Another friend of mine came from Angola, his parents paid for him to be smuggled into SA during the conflict in Angola. His parents were killed during the conflict and he has no home to return to. This particular guy is fluent in seven languages but still can't work here legally, despite being well educated and a totally quality guy. I for one would accept all of these people because not a single one of them would be a draw on local resources and benefits, rather, they all would (and do) contribute to the local economy. I value people for they are not for what I'm told they are so I'll leave you and your well earned yellow card to continue in your rabid ranting. I for one am out of this discussion.
Cynic or realist? It's a fine line! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 04 Aug 15 12.26pm | |
---|---|
Quote dannyh at 04 Aug 2015 11.50am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Aug 2015 11.46am
Quote fed up eagle at 03 Aug 2015 11.05pm
Right, it's time to pull up the draw bridge, batten down the hatches. NO MORE IMMIGRANTS, PERIOD. And the ones that are here that aren't supposed to be need to be deported with immediate effect, end of. No more bleeding heart cr@P. And when the UK Finance industry collapses, we can all have a merry dance, given that the UK is entirely dependent of foreign business and investment. Ironically these companies tend to like to keep their employees in their company. I suppose one daft statement deserves another. Haha, unfortunately its true, UK industry and income is entirely dependent on foreign corporations, especially finance. Take the IT sector, there are no longer any UK IT companies of note (ICL were the last, now Fujitsu). We need those companies to be able to function here, and their employees to be able to move freely between countries, otherwise they'll descale their UK based operations. Even more disturbing is how dependent on foreign corporations the UK defence industry is.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 04 Aug 15 12.30pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Aug 2015 12.10pm
Quote johnfirewall at 04 Aug 2015 12.06pm
Let's move on from the benefits argument then. EU pays jobless migrants to come to Britain Premempting the obvious replies: I've no idea how many Brits were employed abroad through the scheme but I doubt it would've made economic sense for any of them to have done so, and I wouldn't imagine it applies to holiday rep jobs in Greece. It would appear our 'fair share' was exceeded somewhat in the same way that demand for residence here, legal or otherwise outstrips supply. We should be paying jobless British people to relocate to areas of employment ourselves. The idea in theory isn't bad, its just that we aren't doing it, where as the EU is. It makes sense to employ unemployed people. The fact the UK doesn't actually do this is absurdly short sited and resulted in large scale working migration (cheaper but ultimately socially damaging). This is what WE should be doing, rather than a welfare approach that's 'spend the least amount possible and demonise the poor' There was uproar recently when councils started relocating people to areas with more / cheaper housing. The objection was the lack of employment in the new area, which is a bit rich if you didn't have a job to start with. Obviously there's an imbalance here and immigration isn't helping London. Geographically we are burdened as well. Where realistically are you going to send people short of 'Manpool' becoming an actual thing and providing sufficient opportunities? I have heard people are actually taken to London for 'processing' but I'd be happy to invest in their future up north.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.