You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 9 dead in USA Church Shooting.
November 24 2024 12.25am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

9 dead in USA Church Shooting.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 23 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 19 Jun 15 10.57pm

[Link]


Some light relief.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 19 Jun 15 11.02pm Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Here is the DoD's definition: "the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”

Note the use of the word unlawful, and also the intent of the violence.

This case looks like a text book definition of racist terrorism. He sought to spread fear and start a race war.

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 19 Jun 15 11.12pm

Quote NickinOX at 19 Jun 2015 11.02pm

Here is the DoD's definition: "the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”

Note the use of the word unlawful, and also the intent of the violence.

This case looks like a text book definition of racist terrorism. He sought to spread fear and start a race war.

It is a very wide definition, a lot of riots would qualify. But in this case I guess he was motivated by racist/political ideas, so perhaps terrorism. Having said that, he is probably nuts as well.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 19 Jun 15 11.22pm Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Quote derben at 19 Jun 2015 11.12pm

Quote NickinOX at 19 Jun 2015 11.02pm

Here is the DoD's definition: "the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”

Note the use of the word unlawful, and also the intent of the violence.

This case looks like a text book definition of racist terrorism. He sought to spread fear and start a race war.

It is a very wide definition, a lot of riots would qualify. But in this case I guess he was motivated by racist/political ideas, so perhaps terrorism. Having said that, he is probably nuts as well.

Riots by their very nature don't strike me as being particularly calculated, except, perhaps, by an organizer.

This man had a clear political object, he acted unlawfully to spread terror and it was for an ideological purpose, judging from him own statements as they have been reported. He might well also be a nutter, but that does not stop the rest being true, as long as he understood what he was doing.

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TUX Flag redhill 19 Jun 15 11.24pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote NickinOX at 19 Jun 2015 11.02pm

Here is the DoD's definition: "the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”

Note the use of the word unlawful, and also the intent of the violence.

This case looks like a text book definition of racist terrorism. He sought to spread fear and start a race war.

Yep, that's what I said earlier regarding those that govern us. No responses though for some reason.....cough cough. Including yourself.

That said, you let yourself down with your last paragraph.
It's far from 'text book' unless you have studied this kind of behaviour before. Have you? Or are you just jumping on a bandwagon and googled?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 20 Jun 15 12.30am Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Quote TUX at 19 Jun 2015 11.24pm

Quote NickinOX at 19 Jun 2015 11.02pm

Here is the DoD's definition: "the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”

Note the use of the word unlawful, and also the intent of the violence.

This case looks like a text book definition of racist terrorism. He sought to spread fear and start a race war.

Yep, that's what I said earlier regarding those that govern us. No responses though for some reason.....cough cough. Including yourself.

That said, you let yourself down with your last paragraph.
It's far from 'text book' unless you have studied this kind of behaviour before. Have you? Or are you just jumping on a bandwagon and googled?


It is text-book. Go look up definitions at the FBI and elsewhere. They are all broadly similar in their definition. When it comes to rhetoric, that is a different matter.

You did not make clear the unlawful piece in your post. Whether or not you agree, states using their armed forces during a conflict would have to really work hard to be terrorists. A nation state's armed forces are by their nature lawful implements of force, even if a conflict might in of itself be unlawful or the way in which they behave is. That is a well established part of international law going back to 1648.

That does not mean states cannot use terrorism, many do. They employ unlawful violence through a non lawful armed force of some kind. SOE planting bombs during WWII was terrorism plain and simple. The Soviets sponsoring violent left wing extremists during the Cold War is another example of a state sponsoring terrorism. That is so, even if the state itself does not directly use the methodology itself.

As for your remark about me, I happen to be living several hours behind, and I have been at work all day. Furthermore, I don't often post anymore.

Edited by NickinOX (20 Jun 2015 1.08am)

Edited by NickinOX (20 Jun 2015 2.45am)

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 20 Jun 15 1.36am Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

An NRA board members has charmingly blamed one of the victims of the shooting for the killings: [Link]

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 20 Jun 15 1.46am Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Quote Seth at 20 Jun 2015 1.36am

An NRA board members has charmingly blamed one of the victims of the shooting for the killings: [Link]

The guy is demonstrably an idiot. Even if I bought what he was selling, the logic still does not work. There is no cause and effect.

If you are curious, look up the political history of the NRA. The 2nd Amendment argument is really quite a recent one and regulation was far more broadly accepted until the 1960s.

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
sa_eagle Flag Just outside Cape Town 20 Jun 15 7.39am Send a Private Message to sa_eagle Add sa_eagle as a friend

Quote NickinOX at 20 Jun 2015 1.46am

Quote Seth at 20 Jun 2015 1.36am

An NRA board members has charmingly blamed one of the victims of the shooting for the killings: [Link]

The guy is demonstrably an idiot. Even if I bought what he was selling, the logic still does not work. There is no cause and effect.

If you are curious, look up the political history of the NRA. The 2nd Amendment argument is really quite a recent one and regulation was far more broadly accepted until the 1960s.

Can the NRA sink any lower?

 


Cynic or realist? It's a fine line!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
black eagle. Flag south croydon. 20 Jun 15 5.07pm Send a Private Message to black eagle. Add black eagle. as a friend

I hope the cnut gets the electric chair

i'm glad he was caught as now hopefully he will suffer in prison before been put to sleep.

my heart goes out to all who lost loved ones.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 20 Jun 15 5.35pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

I agree, this guy deserves the chair.

His upbringing also seems to have been on an almost criminal footing.

America.....A great country.....unfortunately has its fair share of nut jobs.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
black eagle. Flag south croydon. 20 Jun 15 5.52pm Send a Private Message to black eagle. Add black eagle. as a friend

Quote Stirlingsays at 20 Jun 2015 5.35pm

I agree, this guy deserves the chair.

His upbringing also seems to have been on an almost criminal footing.

America.....A great country.....unfortunately has its fair share of nut jobs.


I agree Stirling,America is a great country i've been there myself.

They've been talking about changing the gun law there for years.

And i bet even arfter this nothing gets done despite Obama saying he will review the gun laws.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 6 of 23 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 9 dead in USA Church Shooting.