Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 6 of 13 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

7@burnley79 Battersea 18 Apr 14 12.26am
Offer Cardiff the 3 points, stipulating they make a formal apology on the grounds of fabrication. Fat lot of good it will do them, they will still be sh-t, they'll still have Tan, they wont catch us even if we decided to field the youth side for the remaining 4 games. While we are at give Judus 3 too, he needs some badly and we got lots at the moment... Share the love Palace we got plenty.....
Alert a moderator to this post

7@burnley79

Battersea 18 Apr 14 12.26am

Offer Cardiff the 3 points, stipulating they make a formal apology on the grounds of fabrication.

Fat lot of good it will do them, they will still be sh-t, they'll still have Tan, they wont catch us even if we decided to field the youth side for the remaining 4 games.
While we are at give Judus 3 too, he needs some badly and we got lots at the moment...

Share the love Palace we got plenty.....

Alert a moderator to this post

Seth On a pale blue dot 18 Apr 14 1.28am
Here's the actual letter: [Tweet Link] "You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16
Alert a moderator to this post

Seth

On a pale blue dot 18 Apr 14 1.28am

Here's the actual letter:

[Tweet Link]

"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert a moderator to this post

SE25 Melbourne 18 Apr 14 9.29am
Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm WE shouldn't really slate Doogie too much. Once he had this information he had to share it with the authorities or become an accessory to the fact. That may have meant sanctions against Bolton. He had no option. Anyway, we should all want open-handed honesty, shouldn't we? Accessory to the fact ? Blimey ! He received a text with some players names on it - not the Brinks Mat gold ! He's a right snake. He tipped OGS off as they're mates. Despite the fact he had the support of so many Palace people for so long. Showed his true colours once and for all - anyone still defending him is a moron (sorry - but it's true)
Alert a moderator to this post

SE25

Melbourne 18 Apr 14 9.29am

Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm

WE shouldn't really slate Doogie too much. Once he had this information he had to share it with the authorities or become an accessory to the fact. That may have meant sanctions against Bolton. He had no option. Anyway, we should all want open-handed honesty, shouldn't we?

Accessory to the fact ? Blimey !
He received a text with some players names on it - not the Brinks Mat gold !
He's a right snake. He tipped OGS off as they're mates. Despite the fact he had the support of so many Palace people for so long.
Showed his true colours once and for all - anyone still defending him is a moron (sorry - but it's true)

Alert a moderator to this post

Username Horsham 18 Apr 14 10.51am
Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 9.29am Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm WE shouldn't really slate Doogie too much. Once he had this information he had to share it with the authorities or become an accessory to the fact. That may have meant sanctions against Bolton. He had no option. Anyway, we should all want open-handed honesty, shouldn't we? Accessory to the fact ? Blimey ! He received a text with some players names on it - not the Brinks Mat gold ! He's a right snake. He tipped OGS off as they're mates. Despite the fact he had the support of so many Palace people for so long. Showed his true colours once and for all - anyone still defending him is a moron (sorry - but it's true) I'm reluctant to have a go at DF here because, if he was involved at all, it's not like he asked someone to send him a message containing the Cardiff team. Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time.
Alert a moderator to this post

Username

Horsham 18 Apr 14 10.51am

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 9.29am

Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm

I'm reluctant to have a go at DF here because, if he was involved at all, it's not like he asked someone to send him a message containing the Cardiff team.

Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time.

Alert a moderator to this post

Jim_Cannon Dulwich 18 Apr 14 10.55am
Quote Seth at 18 Apr 2014 1.28am Here's the actual letter: [Tweet Link] Loving the letter - class. Perhaps Tan will declare War
Alert a moderator to this post

Jim_Cannon

Dulwich 18 Apr 14 10.55am

Quote Seth at 18 Apr 2014 1.28am

Here's the actual letter:

[Tweet Link]

Loving the letter - class. Perhaps Tan will declare War

Alert a moderator to this post

SE25 Melbourne 18 Apr 14 11.01am
Quote Username at 18 Apr 2014 10.51am Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 9.29am Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm WE shouldn't really slate Doogie too much. Once he had this information he had to share it with the authorities or become an accessory to the fact. That may have meant sanctions against Bolton. He had no option. Anyway, we should all want open-handed honesty, shouldn't we? Accessory to the fact ? Blimey ! He received a text with some players names on it - not the Brinks Mat gold ! He's a right snake. He tipped OGS off as they're mates. Despite the fact he had the support of so many Palace people for so long. Showed his true colours once and for all - anyone still defending him is a moron (sorry - but it's true) I'm reluctant to have a go at DF here because, if he was involved at all, it's not like he asked someone to send him a message containing the quote] Huh ? Receiving the text isn't the issue - sending it on to the detriment of Palace is. He put OGS (and Cardiff) ahead of the club that he spent years at and that gave him his management start. He betrayed all Palace fans.None of us should be reluctant to have a go at Freedman. He's an ungrateful , spiteful prick. Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 11.07am)
Alert a moderator to this post

SE25

Melbourne 18 Apr 14 11.01am

Quote Username at 18 Apr 2014 10.51am

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 9.29am

Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm

I'm reluctant to have a go at DF here because, if he was involved at all, it's not like he asked someone to send him a message containing the

quote]

Huh ?
Receiving the text isn't the issue - sending it on to the detriment of Palace is. He put OGS (and Cardiff) ahead of the club that he spent years at and that gave him his management start. He betrayed all Palace fans.None of us should be reluctant to have a go at Freedman. He's an ungrateful , spiteful prick.

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 11.07am)

Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 11.20am
Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,
Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b

Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 11.20am

Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,

Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 11.27am
Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not, I think you're confusing an allegation of a breach of the regulations of a sporting body with criminal acts that are enshrined in statute and common law. No crime has been committed as far as I'm aware (from the fulsome disclosures by the BBC) and I'm not, therefore, expecting anyone to be arrested or any criminal charges laid any time soon. Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave

Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 11.27am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am

I think you're confusing an allegation of a breach of the regulations of a sporting body with criminal acts that are enshrined in statute and common law. No crime has been committed as far as I'm aware (from the fulsome disclosures by the BBC) and I'm not, therefore, expecting anyone to be arrested or any criminal charges laid any time soon.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert a moderator to this post

eagleboi Catford 18 Apr 14 11.28am
Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not, Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleboi

Catford 18 Apr 14 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am

Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 18 Apr 14 11.28am
What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 18 Apr 14 11.28am

What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 11.31am
Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is. Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that. Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave

Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 11.31am

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is.

Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 11.36am
Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.
Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b

Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 11.36am

Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 6 of 13 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors