This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Penge Eagle Beckenham 17 May 13 10.47am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 16 May 2013 5.23pm
Quote Penge Eagle at 16 May 2013 11.09am
Quote nickgusset at 16 May 2013 6.26am
Quote Penge Eagle at 16 May 2013 1.01am
This is just embarrassing from Gusset! Your cut and pastes are getting worse. Oh and what is the solution to austerity then? Spend and borrow even more money we dont have? I see the socialist Hollande doing well with France's economy...
What is your solution? A hypothetical idea-sorry if it is a bit simplistic... Currently the rate of interest for the government to borrow on a 15 year loan is 2.43%. Therefore, it would cost the government £24.3 million a year in repayments if it borrowed £1bn. In the north west, new homes for social housing cost about £120,000 to build. With £1bn you could build 8,330 houses. If the rent for each house was set at about £5,500 a year (affordable) then the total income would be £45.8m per year, a surplus of £21.5m on the repayments. Over 15 years, this would amount to a surplus of around £322m. Of course you have to take inflation into account, say 2% a year - the £1bn would devalue by 2% a year meaning after 15 years the original loan of £1bn would actually be worth about 30% less than it is today. So we would repay the equivalent of about £666m. Of course people are needed to build the houses, this will take people off of benefits, If the average amount of benefits is £100 a week (jsa and housing benefit) it amounts to £5200 a year. If the same person were to earn an average wage of £22k a year building the houses, then they would pay around £3500 Tax and NI a year. So the public purse will make a gain of about £8700 a year from that person who is not receiving benefit and paying taxes. Multiply this by the number of people taken off benefits to build the houses (say 500 for arguments sake) and you now have £4.35m a year into the public purse. Of course with more money, these people will buy more goods and services which means more tax paid. Additionally, you would have companies supplying the goods and contracts to build the houses, their profits would increase with additional corporation tax to pay. So not only do we get people off of benefits and into work, we save on benefits and generate more tax but we also go some way to solving the housing crisis, especially if this model is repeated around the country. I like this, it shows you are coming up with solutions here. Flaws for me are... The key is how do you persuade somebody to come off welfare to build the houses if their income from benefits is enough for them to sit on the sofa instead of lumbering bricks about? Therefore, you would have to agree with the reforming of benefits (ie cutting it to those who are fit to work) in order to incentivise them to do it. I'd stay on my sofa! What if you can't persuade these guys to work, then your whole idea is screwed. The construction of houses IS a good way of getting the economy moving. Currently the government are right to adopt a few schemes that helps people fund deposits which ensures new builds are actually completed and they can build more. The trickle down effect of new construction is very, very good for the economy. This way, the govt only has to fund 20% of mortgage deposits, while your scheme has them funding 100% of it which means far less houses being built. So this is one scheme that would work for Osbourne if done effectively. PS This govt money to build the homes has been largely made up from 'evil' corporations.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
johnfirewall 17 May 13 11.05am | |
---|---|
Lend to someone paying 0 tax with a high change of default or bail out an industry employing hundreds of thousands in the 40% bracket...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 17 May 13 4.35pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 16 May 2013 5.33pm
Instead of bailing out banks, the government could bail out those in debt. The banks would get money from repaid loans and many people would have a bit of disposable income again which they would spend thus getting the economy going again.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 17 May 13 4.57pm | |
---|---|
Quote chris123 at 17 May 2013 4.35pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 May 2013 5.33pm
Instead of bailing out banks, the government could bail out those in debt. The banks would get money from repaid loans and many people would have a bit of disposable income again which they would spend thus getting the economy going again.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 17 May 13 5.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2013 4.57pm
Quote chris123 at 17 May 2013 4.35pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 May 2013 5.33pm
Instead of bailing out banks, the government could bail out those in debt. The banks would get money from repaid loans and many people would have a bit of disposable income again which they would spend thus getting the economy going again.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 17 May 13 5.05pm | |
---|---|
Quote chris123 at 17 May 2013 5.00pm
Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2013 4.57pm
Quote chris123 at 17 May 2013 4.35pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 May 2013 5.33pm
Instead of bailing out banks, the government could bail out those in debt. The banks would get money from repaid loans and many people would have a bit of disposable income again which they would spend thus getting the economy going again.
Only time can tell us...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 20 May 13 9.11pm | |
---|---|
Any response to my reply to your original post Nick? Like I say, it's easy to slam the Tories for the cuts but a bit more difficult to have a feasible solution.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 May 13 9.18pm | |
---|---|
Quote Penge Eagle at 20 May 2013 9.11pm
Any response to my reply to your original post Nick? Like I say, it's easy to slam the Tories for the cuts but a bit more difficult to have a feasible solution.
Read [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 20 May 13 9.25pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 20 May 2013 9.18pm
Quote Penge Eagle at 20 May 2013 9.11pm
Any response to my reply to your original post Nick? Like I say, it's easy to slam the Tories for the cuts but a bit more difficult to have a feasible solution.
Read [Link] But I don't think your solution or workable at all. Just wondering if you had feedback to my response maybe countering it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
chris123 hove actually 20 May 13 9.31pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 20 May 2013 9.18pm
Quote Penge Eagle at 20 May 2013 9.11pm
Any response to my reply to your original post Nick? Like I say, it's easy to slam the Tories for the cuts but a bit more difficult to have a feasible solution.
Read [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 May 13 9.44pm | |
---|---|
Quote chris123 at 20 May 2013 9.31pm
Quote nickgusset at 20 May 2013 9.18pm
Quote Penge Eagle at 20 May 2013 9.11pm
Any response to my reply to your original post Nick? Like I say, it's easy to slam the Tories for the cuts but a bit more difficult to have a feasible solution.
Read [Link]
And how does that benefit you and me?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 20 May 13 9.49pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 20 May 2013 9.44pm
Quote chris123 at 20 May 2013 9.31pm
Quote nickgusset at 20 May 2013 9.18pm
Quote Penge Eagle at 20 May 2013 9.11pm
Any response to my reply to your original post Nick? Like I say, it's easy to slam the Tories for the cuts but a bit more difficult to have a feasible solution.
Read [Link]
And how does that benefit you and me?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.