This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Badger11 Beckenham 23 Nov 21 9.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Would those be the boundaries of sexism set by the men, or the women? Or do the women merely tolerate this as 'part of the culture'? Has anyone ever asked them? If it's not acceptable for racism, why is it acceptable for sexism in 2021?
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 23 Nov 21 9.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Very, very revealing comment! Why do you assume that all the sexist comments are by men towards women? I can assure you that they aren't. Not by a very long chalk. The boundaries are set by decent people using common sense. This is real banter, intended to produce smiles, and not offence or hurt. Most people understand the difference very well. It's a huge shame that some don't. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (23 Nov 2021 9.00am) So what are these boundaries and who has set them? Was it a committee who decided what was ok, of course it wasn’t. It’s what you decided was acceptable. So what happens if others find your banter like boundaries unacceptable, do you merely inform them that you are the bastion of reasonableness therefore you are correct? The boundaries for banter have been changing for years which is why you have to be careful to compare apples with apples. The words used by Alf Garnett and his sparring partners would never be acceptable now but were so back in the 70s. If you translate this to Yorkshire then maybe they as a club haven’t progressed as they should and yet there still seems to be a desire for Rafiq to name individuals and blame them whilst still saying it’s only the club itself that is an issue. One thing is for sure, he is not going to make many friends out of this and you have to question whether this has assisted or hampered racial awareness. It will certainly have polarised views as it has done here.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Helmet46 Croydon 23 Nov 21 10.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Very, very revealing comment! Why do you assume that all the sexist comments are by men towards women? I can assure you that they aren't. Not by a very long chalk. The boundaries are set by decent people using common sense. This is real banter, intended to produce smiles, and not offence or hurt. Most people understand the difference very well. It's a huge shame that some don't. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (23 Nov 2021 9.00am) I have to say, this is the most revealing comment of all. You and your sports team are only a misplaced comment away from being discussed on here by people that are just like you and hold the same views. Edited by Helmet46 (23 Nov 2021 11.54am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 23 Nov 21 10.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Very, very revealing comment! Why do you assume that all the sexist comments are by men towards women?* I can assure you that they aren't. Not by a very long chalk. The boundaries are set by decent people using common sense. **This is real banter, intended to produce smiles, and not offence or hurt. Most people understand the difference very well. It's a huge shame that some don't. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (23 Nov 2021 9.00am) * I make that assumption because that is the general nature of such things ** But does it? or do people just go along with it as 'part of the culture' that has to be tolerated to fit in because everyone else smiles at it? As I say, has anyone thought to ask (either the men or the women) to check that everyone's actually ok with the 'banter'? As you say, "most" people understand the difference, but what if anyone in your sport doesn't, are they really to simply be dismissed as a 'huge shame'?
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Hrolf The Ganger 23 Nov 21 12.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As is very frequently the case, your over-powering prejudices results in you spectacularly missing the point. Rafiq wants and expects to be treated the same way as everyone else. He doesn't excuse himself and knows full well he was part of the problem. He hasn't "accused" people individually. He has identified incidents as examples of the wider cultural problem that the Committee forced the cricket representatives to admit was institutional racism. The overwhelming impression from his testimony was not any allocation of individual blame, on people he regards as his friends, but of a shared responsibility for not speaking out sooner. My prejudice is in favour of common sense. Puritanism of this sort can only result in farce. The word 'racism' is just a buzz word used for an agenda. You spin everything for the sake of argument, but the reality is that enforcing language and behaviour rules is a slippery slope. You are of course too dim to understand this.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 Nov 21 1.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Very, very revealing comment! Why do you assume that all the sexist comments are by men towards women? I can assure you that they aren't. Not by a very long chalk. The boundaries are set by decent people using common sense. This is real banter, intended to produce smiles, and not offence or hurt. Most people understand the difference very well. It's a huge shame that some don't. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (23 Nov 2021 9.00am) This is something that many of us have come to regard as more true of the past but less true in the present. Considering you're the guy who spent time on here arguing that despising someone and hating them has some arguable difference then I can only assume that common sense left you some time ago. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Nov 2021 1.50pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
palace_in_frogland In a broken dream 23 Nov 21 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Would those be the boundaries of sexism set by the men, or the women? Or do the women merely tolerate this as 'part of the culture'? Has anyone ever asked them? If it's not acceptable for racism, why is it acceptable for sexism in 2021? Ye gods, you’ll all be wanting to vote, next...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 23 Nov 21 4.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by palace_in_frogland
Ye gods, you’ll all be wanting to vote, next... For gods sake, don't get her hopes up, they've only just been allowed into pubs...
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 Nov 21 4.50pm | |
---|---|
Women are wonderful...Yin and Yang...the opposite side to the same coin. Feminists, not so much.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
palace_in_frogland In a broken dream 23 Nov 21 5.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eagleman13
For gods sake, don't get her hopes up, they've only just been allowed into pubs... Beginning of the end when they allowed them into the snug.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 23 Nov 21 7.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by palace_in_frogland
Beginning of the end when they allowed them into the snug. Sorry! Only just catching up - I've been in the kitchen all afternoon........
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Nov 21 7.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
There are people who differ politically with me that I regard as honest and worth listening to when it comes to ethical questions....even if I might not agree with their take on them. While I don't wish to appear too harsh, but in my experience, I can't say that you are one of those people. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Nov 2021 12.26am) How arrogant! Only the morally superior can look down in judgement, and then appear to be harsh. Harsh is definitely not the right word for how you appear, but I won't specify what I believe is much more accurate. That would be too harsh.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.