This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Park Road 23 May 19 9.52am | |
---|---|
Interesting point made by Iranian refugee
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 May 19 10.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Right now it's too homosexual for Islam. Next it will be too Jewish, then too Christian, then too Scientific, then too multi-racial and finally too white - with about another hundred too's in between. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
I stand with the moderates in Islam in objecting to the encroachment of taught attitudes towards homosexuality that go against their religious beliefs. Their children are being taught egalitarian ideas towards sexuality when in truth none of the Abrahamic religions teach this towards sexuality and not in other areas either. Christianity has figuratively twisted itself to provide an interpretation that suggests the current protestant approach. Anyone who has fully read the Bible knows that you need to deliberately ignore passages and highlight others to achieve this......and the important difference here is that the passages against homosexuality are specific in meaning....whereas the passages you have to highlight in support of acceptance are purely general Christian principle in nature.....not specific. In truth, teaching that homosexuality is equal isn't what any of those religions teach......So when you are teaching children from socially conservative religious families, you are going to run into conflict. My personal attitude to homosexuality is a mixture of social conservativism mixed in with acceptance based upon both the humanistic and scientific. However, I too rebel against touchy feely 'nothing to see here' interpretations. If your family has one son or female and they are homosexual your genetic line is.....in most cases.....coming to a genetic deadend. People have the right not to regard that as 'nothing to see here'. The current culture which sees that as some form of evil is nearly as over the top as the attitudes that try to regard homosexuality as someone's fault or un-natural.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 23 May 19 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I stand with the moderates in Islam in objecting to the encroachment of taught attitudes towards homosexuality that go against their religious beliefs. Their children are being taught egalitarian ideas towards sexuality when in truth none of the Abrahamic religions teach this towards sexuality and not in other areas either. Christianity has figuratively twisted itself to provide an interpretation that suggests the current protestant approach. Anyone who has fully read the Bible knows that you need to deliberately ignore passages and highlight others to achieve this......and the important difference here is that the passages against homosexuality are specific in meaning....whereas the passages you have to highlight in support of acceptance are purely general Christian principle in nature.....not specific. In truth, teaching that homosexuality is equal isn't what any of those religions teach......So when you are teaching children from socially conservative religious families, you are going to run into conflict. My personal attitude to homosexuality is a mixture of social conservativism mixed in with acceptance based upon both the humanistic and scientific. However, I too rebel against touchy feely 'nothing to see here' interpretations. If your family has one son or female and they are homosexual your genetic line is.....in most cases.....coming to a genetic deadend. People have the right not to regard that as 'nothing to see here'. The current culture which sees that as some form of evil is nearly as over the top as the attitudes that try to regard homosexuality as someone's fault or un-natural.
In fairness, there are plenty of straight couples who are too self centered to have kids.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 May 19 12.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
In fairness, there are plenty of straight couples who are too self centered to have kids. For sure, however statistically that is considerably lower. If a parent values the continuance of the genetic line they can stress that importance to their children....however, if those children are homosexual that expectation is a little misplaced and statistically less likely. Less likely but of course I recognise that it does happen....probably more with socially conservative homosexuals who kind of think the same way. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 May 2019 12.57pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
mezzer Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 23 May 19 3.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Right now it's too homosexual for Islam. Next it will be too Jewish, then too Christian, then too Scientific, then too multi-racial and finally too white - with about another hundred too's in between. This is just the tip of the iceberg. One of my favourite punchlines - well done for working it in
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 23 May 19 4.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I stand with the moderates in Islam in objecting to the encroachment of taught attitudes towards homosexuality that go against their religious beliefs. Their children are being taught egalitarian ideas towards sexuality when in truth none of the Abrahamic religions teach this towards sexuality and not in other areas either. Christianity has figuratively twisted itself to provide an interpretation that suggests the current protestant approach. Anyone who has fully read the Bible knows that you need to deliberately ignore passages and highlight others to achieve this......and the important difference here is that the passages against homosexuality are specific in meaning....whereas the passages you have to highlight in support of acceptance are purely general Christian principle in nature.....not specific. In truth, teaching that homosexuality is equal isn't what any of those religions teach......So when you are teaching children from socially conservative religious families, you are going to run into conflict. My personal attitude to homosexuality is a mixture of social conservativism mixed in with acceptance based upon both the humanistic and scientific. However, I too rebel against touchy feely 'nothing to see here' interpretations. If your family has one son or female and they are homosexual your genetic line is.....in most cases.....coming to a genetic deadend. People have the right not to regard that as 'nothing to see here'. The current culture which sees that as some form of evil is nearly as over the top as the attitudes that try to regard homosexuality as someone's fault or un-natural.
I fully understand your personal attitude. However, I suspect you would not protest or send death threats to a homosexual teacher. I suspect your attitude is to tolerate homosexuality and accept it as part of our secular society - even if you are quite Christian.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 May 19 4.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I fully understand your personal attitude. However, I suspect you would not protest or send death threats to a homosexual teacher. I suspect your attitude is to tolerate homosexuality and accept it as part of our secular society - even if you are quite Christian. An excellent post sir.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 23 May 19 8.01pm | |
---|---|
This will certainly put the cat amonst the pigeon5 so to speak.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 23 May 19 9.16pm | |
---|---|
Regards to the LGBT issue I don't agree with it but there are many things I disagree with but being part of British society you go with what is legal and the British way.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 May 19 9.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
This will certainly put the cat amonst the pigeon5 so to speak.
Edited by Stirlingsays (23 May 2019 10.43pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 23 May 19 9.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Regards to the LGBT issue I don't agree with it but there are many things I disagree with but being part of British society you go with what is legal and the British way. I知 sort of with you but the reason I feel that same sex relationships should be introduced into learning is to give the kids of same sex parents an easier time. If you池e relying on parents out there to take on this role then I知 afraid you値l be disappointed. Take a look in Asda or macdonalds and you値l see why.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 May 19 9.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I知 sort of with you but the reason I feel that same sex relationships should be introduced into learning is to give the kids of same sex parents an easier time. If you池e relying on parents out there to take on this role then I知 afraid you値l be disappointed. Take a look in Asda or macdonalds and you値l see why. If that's the case then on this topic I fundamentally disagree with you. If we are going to start pushing state approved ideas on homosexuality then where does that stop....and where does the right of the parent begin? So shall we have lessons about treating ugly kids nicely. How about lessons on teaching that low IQ children are the same as everybody else? No, responsible teaching should teach that an individual treats another individual fairly. There should be no requirement for special groups in society to get their own prominence. The day a school starts to 'group think' my children is the day I'll start home schooling. It's an over stepping of the loose social contract that exists between individual and state.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.