This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Much as it’s a piss take most petrol cars after late 2006 and diesels after late 2016 should be exempt. Doesn’t mean it’s right though the stupid khant.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
There’s an anti ULEZ expansion demo on Saturday January 28 at 12 noon Trafalgar Square.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Apparently Sutton council is refusing to co-operate and wont allow TFL to install cameras, hopefully other boroughs follow suit. Sutton's argument which I think is a fair one is that they have very little public transport in the borough e.g. no tram no tube. Edited by Badger11 (14 Jan 2023 11.41am)
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all. Have you considered that some people, who require a car for work, may not be able to afford anything other than “an old banger”? Especially, at the present time, when your friends from the Unions are bringing the railways to a near standstill
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all. You certainly meet euro emission standards.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Have you considered that some people, who require a car for work, may not be able to afford anything other than “an old banger”? Especially, at the present time, when your friends from the Unions are bringing the railways to a near standstill It's all those selfish minimum wage earners. Not only do they refuse to work from home or buy a new car but they insist on working before and after everyone else which extends the period in which the planet is being destroyed. They should be fined every day until they have a bit more consideration.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all. When public transport is not good enough what are they supposed to do.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Very good speech on ULEZ Expanding ULEZ is a cash grab to fill Sadiq Khan's coffers. But it's not a tax on wealthy drivers. Over 50% of households in outer London earning as little as £10,000 own a car. ULEZ is a tax on ordinary working people who can't afford a new car or Khan's daily £12.50 charge.
I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It will undoubtedly be extremely unpopular. I prefer horse and carriage myself, environmentally friendly and good for the garden.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The words ignorant tawt and konb spring to mind Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.