This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
HKOwen Hong Kong 02 Mar 24 2.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Absolutely. How could the outcome conceivably be any different? No one who told the truth in court has ever lost a case after all. Except when they are culpable
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Mar 24 8.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
That way lies madness; where do you draw the line? 20 in and 10 out may only represent a net increase of 10 but if the 10 out were all doctors and the 20 in were all criminals the effect would be bad. Vice versa the effect would be good. Unless those doctors were inept or... or... or... We weren’t though discussing the total number. Just the impact on the NHS. So long as the system works as it should there ought to be very few criminals anyway. We obviously need to get a grip on the illegals. Work and student visas aren’t just issued at will to anyone, employers and universities are involved and able to remain vigilant. There will always be some who misuse the system but once we manage the illegals things ought to be better than now.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 02 Mar 24 8.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
We weren’t though discussing the total number. Just the impact on the NHS. So long as the system works as it should there ought to be very few criminals anyway. We obviously need to get a grip on the illegals. Work and student visas aren’t just issued at will to anyone, employers and universities are involved and able to remain vigilant. There will always be some who misuse the system but once we manage the illegals things ought to be better than now. Must every interpretation be so relentlessly literal? Doctors out & criminals in was given as an obviously extreme example.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Mar 24 8.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
In court you have to tell the truth and if you do you will win. Irony abounds Completely untrue. There was nothing ironic about my recent experience. I know to my cost that telling the truth does not guarantee you win. I did tell the truth, my opponent lied, the judge got it wrong and I lost. Now without doubt you will choose to disbelieve me. It seems that disbelieving anything I say is a prerequisite of daily life for you, but I was there. You weren’t. I know the truth. You don’t. I have many friends. Not one of them has the slightest doubt that I am telling the truth and feel really upset at the outcome. They know me. You don’t. They know I am an honourable man. You just like to believe I am not. My insurance company believes me. So do the Solicitors and the Barrister who represented me. The opinions of my friends and the professionals involved matter to me. Your’s doesn’t. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (02 Mar 2024 8.38pm)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Mar 24 8.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Must every interpretation be so relentlessly literal? Doctors out & criminals in was given as an obviously extreme example. I wasn’t aware I was taking it literally! I was merely using the same example.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Mar 24 8.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Absolutely. How could the outcome conceivably be any different? No one who told the truth in court has ever lost a case after all. I realise you are being sarcastic but I have never suggested that telling the truth always wins. I know it doesn’t. All I said was that it is an obligation placed on a witness. That is the standard we should expect in any honest discussion and not the cherry picking of some facts and the ignoring of others just to support a particular viewpoint.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 02 Mar 24 8.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I realise you are being sarcastic but I have never suggested that telling the truth always wins. I know it doesn’t. All I said was that it is an obligation placed on a witness. That is the standard we should expect in any honest discussion and not the cherry picking of some facts and the ignoring of others just to support a particular viewpoint. Just as well that every single person who ever appears in court is an honest and law abiding citizen who would never dream of contravening these ideals.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 03 Mar 24 12.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Just as well that every single person who ever appears in court is an honest and law abiding citizen who would never dream of contravening these ideals. EVery time I see " ask my friends " i just laugh
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 03 Mar 24 8.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
EVery time I see " ask my friends " i just laugh Maybe because you don’t have any? Those who only see negativity in people tend to remain isolated.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 03 Mar 24 9.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Maybe because you don’t have any? Those who only see negativity in people tend to remain isolated. Off topic but I find it interesting how people classify "friends". I often tell people I don't have any which is untrue I probably have 5/6. I do have a lot of acquaintances but I think I am quite strict in who I actually consider a friend. An acquaintance (see what I did there) talks about people who he barely knows and rarely see as friends. And of course the social media folk have hundreds of friends they have never met. Anyway just an observation not directed any anyone in particular.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 03 Mar 24 10.04am | |
---|---|
The state of UK universities today. [Tweet Link]
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 03 Mar 24 11.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
At what point in history did “white people” become a group? You can understand “black” people describing themselves as such because that’s the way “white” people have described them but it’s not true either. People ought not be defined by any arbitrary characteristic, the borders of which are indistinct and irrelevant. There are many other characteristics better able to determine groups of people. Being “white” confers nothing to anyone. David Badiel is “white”. He is also Jewish. Hitler was “white”. He was anti-Jewish, to put it mildly. One of your most ridiculous posts to date. 'White' people make up about 10% of the world population. They are a small minority globally who have been here for a relatively short time. They are more than entitled to see themselves as a 'group'. How is being called 'Black' more specific? Lots of people with not better qualification than a good tan want to call themselves'Black' these days. 'Black' people have a much greater genetic diversity and come from far more cultural backgrounds than anyone else. They have been around a lot longer. How do they get to be a group and White people don't? You talk out of your backside. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Mar 2024 11.30am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.