Having seen the footage enough is enough. There needs to be proper riot police sent in. Water cannons, batons, the lot and kick the s*** out of them. We are the soft touch of Europe when it comes to this. Throw them in a cell.

No answer then.
When you come up with one try these as well.
Regardless of where they came from how are these millions of people being housed?
How do they get medical treatment?
where do their children go to school?

What has that got to do with a bunch of wound-up, beered-up, travelling thugs attacking the police and causing chaos?

It's an attempt at an excuse for something completely inexcusable.

I gave you a very clear answer! That there was no need to explain the obvious.

The answers to your other questions are as obvious, even if they seem to be the favourite excuse of every anti-immigration proponent.

Within Europe, or between all developed countries, if a person leaves one country and another arrives, then there is no need for additional infrastructure.

Where an economy needs additional people to sustain itself, because of either a growing economy and/or a falling birthrate, there will be a need to increase the infrastructure accordingly. That's always been true, however a country grows. It requires planning. Just as any movement of people within a country does.

Difficulties arise with unplanned illegal migration. Providing sufficient resources for any unplanned situation is always a challenge. However, ultimately the planners can anticipate how many illegals there are likely to be, what proportion of them are likely to have asylum applications granted, factor the numbers into the overall planning and then reduce the number of legal places available if the skill sets match.

The failure to deliver the plans is the real problem. Not that plans are needed or made.

I gave you a very clear answer! That there was no need to explain the obvious.

The answers to your other questions are as obvious, even if they seem to be the favourite excuse of every anti-immigration proponent.

Within Europe, or between all developed countries, if a person leaves one country and another arrives, then there is no need for additional infrastructure.

Where an economy needs additional people to sustain itself, because of either a growing economy and/or a falling birthrate, there will be a need to increase the infrastructure accordingly. That's always been true, however a country grows. It requires planning. Just as any movement of people within a country does.

Difficulties arise with unplanned illegal migration. Providing sufficient resources for any unplanned situation is always a challenge. However, ultimately the planners can anticipate how many illegals there are likely to be, what proportion of them are likely to have asylum applications granted, factor the numbers into the overall planning and then reduce the number of legal places available if the skill sets match.

The failure to deliver the plans is the real problem. Not that plans are needed or made.