This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Palace Old Geezer Midhurst 02 Apr 23 6.26pm | |
---|---|
I'm not too sure about suggestions that either Potter or Rodgers would be suitable managers for us. True, Rodgers is available now, but he never seems to demonstrate much passion and that's what we need after Patrick's lethargic performances. As for Potter, call it infantile, but for me he still has a flavour of Brighton about him and he hasn't been at all convincing at Chelsea. I would like to see Paddy make a huge impact during the remaining games to the extent that Roy influences Mr P and the Board and recommends him for the permanent role. He has shown considerable ability with the U21s and is a loyal Palace man. I vote for Paddy.
Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cROYdonrogers Leamington Spa 02 Apr 23 6.54pm | |
---|---|
No to Rodger’s and no again. Offers nothing to a club like Palace.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 02 Apr 23 7.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Another thing about Rodgers is he's rumoured to be a club yes man, as long as he gets his rewards. In our case, I want a manager to say when players are obviously required - our board seems to need a kick up the Arthur. Vieira did but the board didn't take any notice
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 02 Apr 23 7.02pm | |
---|---|
I wouldn't go with Paddy at this stage. It's by no means a straightforward decision. I do think we avoid vanity projects where a big name manager think they are doing us a favour (Gerrard, Lampard). Ultimately though I suppose all managers end up failing with ever shortening tenures at clubs. Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
I'm not too sure about suggestions that either Potter or Rodgers would be suitable managers for us. True, Rodgers is available now, but he never seems to demonstrate much passion and that's what we need after Patrick's lethargic performances. As for Potter, call it infantile, but for me he still has a flavour of Brighton about him and he hasn't been at all convincing at Chelsea. I would like to see Paddy make a huge impact during the remaining games to the extent that Roy influences Mr P and the Board and recommends him for the permanent role. He has shown considerable ability with the U21s and is a loyal Palace man. I vote for Paddy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 02 Apr 23 7.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I wouldn't go with Paddy at this stage. It's by no means a straightforward decision. I do think we avoid vanity projects where a big name manager think they are doing us a favour (Gerrard, Lampard). Ultimately though I suppose all managers end up failing with ever shortening tenures at clubs. I wholly concur with these comments.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 02 Apr 23 7.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
I would like to see Paddy make a huge impact during the remaining games to the extent that Roy influences Mr P and the Board and recommends him for the permanent role. He has shown considerable ability with the U21s and is a loyal Palace man. I vote for Paddy. It was noticeable yesterday that Roy was chatting quite a lot with Ray just like in the old days yet this time round Paddy is supposedly the Assistant Manager but it seems that although he has the job title he may not actually have the job
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 02 Apr 23 7.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I do think we avoid vanity projects where a big name manager think they are doing us a favour (Gerrard, Lampard). Was that the case or was it just the spin put on it by people who turned us down for other reasons
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Painter Croydon 02 Apr 23 7.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Serves Chelsea right. It cost them £15m to get Potter from Brighton and they'll have to pay him around £50m if they sack him. On top of the £7m Tuchel got to leave. Potter will not be a Palace manager, he doesnt need to manage us. Money, he doesnt need, potential to get into Europe limited, why would he come here?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jackosperoni Penzance, Cornwall 02 Apr 23 7.52pm | |
---|---|
After yesterday, give Roy a ten year contract! It will already take the younger managers like Arteta 30 years to pass him as being the oldest manager to win a game in the Prem! This is a PL record Palace could hold forever! And it's been set by a Croydon boy. Gives us all hope! In Roy we trust!
55 years on the Palace rollercoaster! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nubes London 02 Apr 23 8.13pm | |
---|---|
Well
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 02 Apr 23 8.15pm | |
---|---|
Potter gone
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 02 Apr 23 8.33pm | |
---|---|
I was making a broader point that great players make even very good managers. Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Was that the case or was it just the spin put on it by people who turned us down for other reasons
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.