In other words, you don't actually have any evidence. Just some "numerous reports" you have seen somewhere, probably on the web.

Conspiracy theories aren't evidence. "Doctors and Scientists", many of whom have been shown to not actually have specialist knowledge and/or are attention seekers don't provide it either. They aren't "silenced". They aren't trustworthy.

I get my information from genuine sources which are reported by trustworthy media, both here and elsewhere.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

There is plenty of evidence and first hand experience from people out there. All you have to do is open your eyes and listen.

Any doctor or scientist who had legitimate concerns over vaccine side effects were silenced and or cancelled. Only now we get to hear from some of them who were too scared to speak out.

I am not talking about "Conspiracy theories" here. even tho most "Conspiracy theories" have been correct the last few years.

Oh I am sure you do get your information from genuine sources reported by "trustworthy media".

Would you jump off a cliff if one of these "Genuine sources" told you it was safe? or would you look down first assess the risks yourself and decide maybe i wont jump I risk an injury and or death.

Oh dear, here we go again. Dr Campbell, who isn't a doctor of medicine at all, let alone a specialist virologist, but a nurse educator who has obtained a doctorate, is still winding up the vulnerable.

He, like similar YouTubers, is very clever. He presents a mix of facts blended with conspiracy theories that reinforce the prejudices of his audience. When it has reached 2.72 million subscribers this is a substantial audience and has become a very nice earner for him. How do YouTubers earn money? From the advertisements. They get 40% of the revenue generated from advertisements on their channel, which is calculated on the number of subscribers. Ever wondered why you are encouraged to subscribe? Now you know. It makes money. If you have 2.72 million of them, it makes a lot of money.

He is personable and convincing, but he is not an expert or has what he says checked, verified and edited by one.

Including some verifiable facts leads people to believe that everything he says has the same merit. Yes, there has been a Senate Report on Covid origins, which has reached the same conclusions as at least one of the US intelligence agencies. But, and it's a BIG but, others disagree and there is no consensus in the USA over this. Add to that the fact that this Report was presented, and has been driven by, Republican Senator Roger Marshall, someone who tried to overturn the 2020 election results, opposed impeaching Trump, denies climate change and has been at the forefront of trying to blame China for the pandemic and the smell of political bias becomes strong.

That of course, doesn't mean our good Dr Campbell questions the veracity of the Report in any way. He accepts it as though it answers all the questions. Period. No more doubt. Other opinions can be disposed of.

This is the opening paragraph for Dr Campbell's Wiki entry:-

"John Lorimer Campbell is an English YouTuber and retired nurse educator known for his videos about the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, the videos received praise, but they later veered into misinformation.[2] He has been criticised for suggesting COVID-19 deaths have been over-counted, repeating false claims about the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, and providing misleading commentary about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines."

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

[Link]

"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"

Stan Laurel

[Link]

Obviously, I have no more idea than anyone else why the FDA decided not to publish. As they say it's always a contentious decision. Given the way some people manipulate things I can quite understand any reticence. Lots of adverse comments there show just how under scrutiny they are. They will be damned if they do, and damned if they don't. Not frightening people over relatively rare risks during a vaccination programme to help counter a pandemic which isn't yet over and the long-term implications only now beginning to be understood, is a worthy consideration. So is not feeding the unrelenting hunger of conspiracy theorists. Not easy.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.