You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn
November 24 2024 1.28am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Jeremy Corbyn

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 57 of 464 < 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 >

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 15 Sep 15 6.33pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 6.19pm

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)



How have the current lot helped improve meritocracy in our green and pleasant?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 15 Sep 15 6.33pm Send a Private Message to Sedlescombe Add Sedlescombe as a friend

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

You have that right and no one is taking it away from you. My point is that what interest and incentive does a Tory SoS have in an education system that he doesn't use.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 15 Sep 15 6.41pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote Sedlescombe at 15 Sep 2015 6.33pm

My point is that what interest and incentive does a Tory SoS have in an education system that he doesn't use.

Every incentive to perform well in his job.

I don't subscribe to the argument that any Health Secretary (Of any political persuasion) is not interested in his job for the prime reason that he or she doesn't avail of the service.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 15 Sep 15 6.47pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.33pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 6.19pm

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)



How have the current lot helped improve meritocracy in our green and pleasant?

When one hears about "Quotas" in the Police Force and amongst football managers, and Gender equality etc etc, it appears as though "Meritocracy" has long departed never to return under any Government. But this is another argument.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 15 Sep 15 7.03pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 6.47pm

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.33pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 6.19pm

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)



How have the current lot helped improve meritocracy in our green and pleasant?

When one hears about "Quotas" in the Police Force and amongst football managers, and Gender equality etc etc, it appears as though "Meritocracy" has long departed never to return under any Government. But this is another argument.



Am I to conclude from your response that it hasn't been high on their agenda then because of pesky 'lefty' positive discrimination?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 15 Sep 15 7.34pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)


Why don't you look at the privately educated Jeremy Corbyn instead.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 15 Sep 15 7.38pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Sedlescombe at 15 Sep 2015 6.33pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

You have that right and no one is taking it away from you. My point is that what interest and incentive does a Tory SoS have in an education system that he doesn't use.

That you should ask the question is all the answer you need.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
susmik Flag PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 15 Sep 15 7.59pm Send a Private Message to susmik Add susmik as a friend

Quote Stuk at 15 Sep 2015 7.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)


Why don't you look at the privately educated Jeremy Corbyn instead.


Mr Corbyn received a grammar school education (Adams Grammar in Shropshire).

 


Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 15 Sep 15 8.03pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote susmik at 15 Sep 2015 7.59pm

Quote Stuk at 15 Sep 2015 7.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)


Why don't you look at the privately educated Jeremy Corbyn instead.


Mr Corbyn received a grammar school education (Adams Grammar in Shropshire).

Educated privately at Castle House primary school and raised in a seven bedroom manor house.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 8.04pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 15 Sep 15 8.11pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote susmik at 15 Sep 2015 7.59pm

Quote Stuk at 15 Sep 2015 7.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)


Why don't you look at the privately educated Jeremy Corbyn instead.


Mr Corbyn received a grammar school education (Adams Grammar in Shropshire).


I know.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Goal Machine Flag The Cronx 15 Sep 15 10.48pm Send a Private Message to Goal Machine Add Goal Machine as a friend

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 1.48pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm


However, I do find it funny that the left seem to resent wealthy people paying for education / health care which surely frees up resources for others?

Absolutely !

Taking health as an example anybody who chooses to avail of private healthcare is not burdening the NHS and that person not only pays national taxes (Which funds the NHS the person is not using) but pays into a private healthcare scheme.



They also seem to resent the wealthy who have worked hard their whole lives to get where they are, who pay more tax than they do, create jobs and opportunity from either their own businesses or from the money they spend.

If the lefts get their way and the 70% tax rate comes in, these wealthy people who do so little to help the country will soon leave, along with many large international employers. Who wants a prosperous Britain after all.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 16 Sep 15 8.11am

Quote nickgusset at 15 Sep 2015 6.10pm

Quote Willo at 15 Sep 2015 5.16pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 15 Sep 2015 1.38pm

Just because you can afford to send your child to public school it doesn't mean that you have an issue with comprehensives.

My daughter went to Independent schools both at primary and secondary level but my wife and I considered the State options. My wife was a teacher in the state sector ! Having considered the options we decided it would be in the interest of our daughter to educate her privately and we were in the fortunate financial position of being able to do so. Most certainly the state primary school we were offered never had the best of reputations.

If parents have the necessary financial means then why should they not do what they feel is best for their offspring ? We all want the best for our sons/daughters and If I for example cannot afford something that another family can, then best of luck to them I say.


Edited by Willo (15 Sep 2015 5.17pm)

All well and good, but looking at the government, it hardly shows public schools help towards a meritocratic system does it?


Edited by nickgusset (15 Sep 2015 6.11pm)

Presumably then, you disapprove of Comrade Diane Abbott sending the Abbots-minor to a private school?

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 57 of 464 < 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn