Any day now? Unlikely!

Someday? Very probably.

Mueller discovered a great deal about Trump that he was unable to reveal because of Barr’s intervention. He was very careful in what he said at the time. What he did not say was that he exonerated him.

[Link]

Mueller’s files were all spirited away to secure storage in New York where the Federal authorities cannot order their destruction no matter who is put in charge of the FBI.

When and how they will see the light of day remains unknown. Why no action has yet been taken also is unknown. Deciding how to handle this must be a nightmare for both the Justice Dept and the FBI. My guess is they are hoping it isn’t necessary before the election because it looks certain Trump is going to lose. That happens if the Court cases start to damage him and the Democrats select an alternative to Biden who is younger, credible and has wow appeal. If the present situation prevails and he looks like winning then a bombshell could well emerge. The FBI know full well everything about Trump and that the USA cannot risk another 4 years of him as POTUS. They also know full well the dangers of any perception of them being involved in politics in any way.

Those who think the so called “Russiagate” scandal is a myth are only proving, once again, just how gullible they are. It’s real and it hasn’t gone away.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Abortion being used as a political football is sad to witness, but apparently opposing it is a vote loser in the USA.

I am glad to see France making a strong point over this. Maybe that’s something the Democrats should consider.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Perhaps the government should spend a million pounds on a memorial to terminated nascent lives rather than on Muslim combatants who are already commemorated along with all the others.

There’s much better uses than either.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It is all unsubstantiated and equivalent to believing everything that's in the Daily Star. But it is about Trump so some people want to lap it up. Basically Clinton used campaign funds to have stories about Trump put into a dossier and then leaked.

Red and Blue Army!

I know all of that. One thing that Mueller complained about was the lack of cooperation and openness from Trump and his advisers. That rumours are either unsupported or unproven doesn’t mean they aren’t true or that the evidence doesn’t exist to support them , or that it has been found but not yet released because it needs to be verified.

Mueller knew the truth. He was unable to reveal it due to two barriers. One being Barr’s ruling that a sitting President could not be indicted. The second being the need to prove what he knew to the level where a conviction would result. A conspiracy of silence and the construction of plausible deniability doesn’t mean that nothing exists.

Hence the removal of the papers. How the FBI will handle this remains unknown, but they will. Perhaps by holding a “Sword of Damocles” over Trump to curtail him. I am merely speculating though.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.