This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Bias against Trump
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  georgenorman  08 May 23 10.09pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Really? Evidence, please. He is a long time dead but I am sure you can find some quotes to support this assertion. I thought he considered himself omnipotent. 65 miles was a long way to travel back then. I suspect he would have been more likely to support FC Braunau. I thought Bayern are known as "The Reds" and not the Eagles anyway. Maybe I misunderstood and you were trying to be funny? Easy mistake to make. Not light-hearted? Evidence? We have film footage!
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| footythoughts Beckenham 09 May 23 8.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
A pussy has been grabbed.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 May 23 8.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by footythoughts
A pussy has been grabbed. Not according to Trump's team. It's all part of a "Democratic witch-hunt"! Sound familiar? It seems everything in life that isn't approved by Trump is part of a "Democratic witch-hunt". In this case, the due process of the law seems to be. Amazing!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 09 May 23 9.04pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
A New York jury find Trump guilty based on hearsay and seemingly 'believe all woman'. Most people who aren't biased against Trump, even independents, view this as a case created by political motives. Whether Trump actually did make a move on this woman or not can't really be known....it wouldn't surprise me, but that's not the same thing. The right know that the Democrats weaponized the legal system in their states and are busy ensuring the same in theirs. Its decline apes the west in general. We will see whether this verdict stands the appeal or how it affects Trump's polls.....It may even increase his numbers. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 May 2023 9.07pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 May 23 9.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
A New York jury find Trump guilty based on hearsay and seemingly 'believe all woman'. Most people who aren't biased against Trump, even independents, view this as a case created by political motives. Whether Trump actually did make a move on this woman or not can't really be known....it wouldn't surprise me, but that's not the same thing. The right know that the Democrats weaponized the legal system in their states and are busy ensuring the same in theirs. Its decline apes the west in general. We will see whether this verdict stands the appeal or how it affects Trump's polls.....It may even increase his numbers. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 May 2023 9.07pm) A jury selected for, and guided to be, objective disagreed. They, of course, actually saw and heard all the evidence, and not just the salacious reports of the evidence. Proved beyond a reasonable doubt is the test and it's the only test. No one can "weaponise" a legal system. They can take advantage of someone's guilt but the person has to be guilty first. I am quite sure that the Republicans would not pause for a moment if they could mount cases against Clinton or Biden that would stick. The Democrats didn't mount this case. They may not even benefit from it.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| sydtheeagle England 09 May 23 9.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
For those interested, there's a very good article in the right-wing National Review (staunch republican outlet) summarising the situation: The thrust is basically that Trump is unelectable but it plays to Democrat interests to drum up his candidacy because of that, hence the endless headlines that "Trump is winning" in the liberal press. They'd like nothing better than for Trump to get the Republican nomination because he's the one candidate that even Biden is guaranteed to beat. Large swathes of Republicans are too cowed to stand up to Trump's gang in public, but there's absolutely no way they will vote for him at the ballot box. Anyway, well worth a read (and bear in mind the source is a longstanding right-wing journal).
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| georgenorman 09 May 23 9.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
A jury selected for, and guided to be, objective disagreed. They, of course, actually saw and heard all the evidence, and not just the salacious reports of the evidence. Proved beyond a reasonable doubt is the test and it's the only test. No one can "weaponise" a legal system. They can take advantage of someone's guilt but the person has to be guilty first. I am quite sure that the Republicans would not pause for a moment if they could mount cases against Clinton or Biden that would stick. The Democrats didn't mount this case. They may not even benefit from it. Hitler did.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 09 May 23 10.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
A jury selected for, and guided to be, objective disagreed. They, of course, actually saw and heard all the evidence, and not just the salacious reports of the evidence. Proved beyond a reasonable doubt is the test and it's the only test. No one can "weaponise" a legal system. They can take advantage of someone's guilt but the person has to be guilty first. I am quite sure that the Republicans would not pause for a moment if they could mount cases against Clinton or Biden that would stick. The Democrats didn't mount this case. They may not even benefit from it. The OJ Simpson jury were also directed to be.....it's well known that if that trial hadn't been moved 'downstate' then that murderer would have gone down. If you want to come on here and pretend that a New York jury are apolitical then cool....You might as well argue for flying pink elephants as well but I expect no different from you.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
PalazioVecchio  south pole 10 May 23 12.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by footythoughts
A pussy has been grabbed. $5 million quid. Pricey
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Forest Hillbilly  in a hidey-hole 10 May 23 5.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Wrong as usual. There is a full length one just behind my desk. I am obliged to look at myself every time I sit or stand. Just be grateful you don’t have to. I wouldn’t want you having to wonder at the vitality that open mindedness at my age delivers and comparing it to the effects of prejudice in yourself. Who are you to declare "it's wrong"? How frigging arrogant. comedy central
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Matov 10 May 23 6.11am |
|
|---|---|
|
Trying to get my head around this Trump case. 1. This woman claimed that Trump essentially bumps into her in a department store, persuades her to come and look at some lingerie, cajoles her into a changing room, which she willingly does, and then rapes her. No physical evidence, no CCTV, nothing. No reporting it to the police for decades, no medical evidence. Essentially her word against his. The Jury disbelieves her rape claim but still finds Trump guilty of sexual assault anyway? Trump says he has no idea who this woman even is and vehemently denies it. This woman was either raped or she was not. That is it. If you don't believe her claims about being raped, how can you then believe her claims about being sexually assaulted? Was the penetrative sex consensual but everything else not? None of this makes any sense whatsoever. Edited by Matov (10 May 2023 6.12am)
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The Dolphin 10 May 23 6.51am |
|
|---|---|
|
I am with Matov on this one.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.