In the tactics that were employed on their behalf to get their messages across. Not in them, or the messages.

Such a comment could be applied to others. It just happens that one is the subject of this thread and the other a pivotal figure of the 20th century.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

So it's pure coincidence that you used the pivotal figure of Hitler, you could have used John F. Kennedy.

No. Kennedy would have been a poor example.

Mussolini would have served, and so would Mao, to a degree, but Hitler is the most obvious.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Not in my book, nor do I believe that of most people.

Kennedy didn't hold huge rallies routinely as a way of galvanising support. He certainly became much admired at home and across the globe but much of that came later and wasn't something he engineered via a personality cult.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

You said: "Hitler presented well and held effective rallies. He was adored and followed by unquestioning millions too".

Attachment: JFK.jpg (473.46Kb)

Let me pretend to be you. Where has Trump acknowledged his debt to Roy Cohn , prove your assertion

....when you saved a presumably Filipina from exploitation in some Middle Eastern country blah blah.

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.