This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 13 Aug 19 9.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
So you would rather they didn’t know ‘gay’ was a thing? Genuine question. At five, yeah. I'm not sure as to the value of this area of the humanities.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 13 Aug 19 10.36pm | |
---|---|
Has anyone got an idea of how this is going to be explained.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ChrisGC Wantage 13 Aug 19 10.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
At five, yeah. I'm not sure as to the value of this area of the humanities. Absolutely correct. It's social engineering boardering on perverted to introduce this level of awareness of sexuality at such a young age. Why ever? My son brought a book home written by that closet homosexual Walliams about a boy in a dress. We had a right good laugh at it and decided it was ridiculous and boys don't wear dresses, 'issue' dealt with. Why it's even in the library and available to him is sinister in my eyes, but rather than kick up a fuss with whichever social warrior teacher planted it there (which is what they want) we took the piss out of it, job done. Didn't even finish the book as we both agreed it was weird. If every parent took this common sense approach we wouldn't have made up psychological conditions such as gender confusion in children too young to even understand what they are.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Aug 19 11.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Has anyone got an idea of how this is going to be explained. As a teacher I wouldn't allow slurs like 'gay' in my classroom. I knew some teachers who were fine with it. However, this is on a completely different level. This is the state officially mandating the teaching of your child on different sexual relationships starting at five years old. This is an attack on socially conservative families of any hue and any religion or none at all. What if little Johnny says to the teacher that he doesn't think a child being raised with two mummies and no daddy or vice versa is ok? This is not what the state should be doing. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Aug 2019 11.04pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Aug 19 11.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ChrisGC
Absolutely correct. It's social engineering boardering on perverted to introduce this level of awareness of sexuality at such a young age. Why ever? My son brought a book home written by that closet homosexual Walliams about a boy in a dress. We had a right good laugh at it and decided it was ridiculous and boys don't wear dresses, 'issue' dealt with. Why it's even in the library and available to him is sinister in my eyes, but rather than kick up a fuss with whichever social warrior teacher planted it there (which is what they want) we took the piss out of it, job done. Didn't even finish the book as we both agreed it was weird. If every parent took this common sense approach we wouldn't have made up psychological conditions such as gender confusion in children too young to even understand what they are. We are seeing worrying gender confusion at very young ages and seemingly promotion of neurotic people going on in certain 'progressive' Democratic states in the US....those states are s***holes. Socially liberal or intersectionists can teach their own children what they like, keep that crap away from mine. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Aug 2019 11.48pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 13 Aug 19 11.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I have two small boys, I don't want them having 'LGBT lessons'. The state doesn't, in my view, have the right to decide my children's views on the merits of different types of social relationships. My point was not so much the right or wrong but that I don't see Owen Jones and his lot out in force on the subject against Muslims. Yet if the right had issues with Muslims Owen Jones goes hysterical. I believe the left have gone up a dead end and are starting to realise their mistakes and want to turn back on many views but don't want to eat humble pie.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Aug 19 12.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
My point was not so much the right or wrong but that I don't see Owen Jones and his lot out in force on the subject against Muslims. Yet if the right had issues with Muslims Owen Jones goes hysterical. I believe the left have gone up a dead end and are starting to realise their mistakes and want to turn back on many views but don't want to eat humble pie. The left are getting a small taste of what it's going to be like once the Muslims drop them like a stone.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ChrisGC Wantage 14 Aug 19 8.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The left are getting a small taste of what it's going to be like once the Muslims drop them like a stone. Absolutely. Take Owen Jones for example I don't even reckon he's gay: he just likes to be in that crowd for the social justice angle. That or he's just unable to get some snatch due to his middle age lesbian body and newly hatched bird eyes. He'd be the first the Communists would shoot being both educated and a journalist (arguable) and definitely the first thrown off a rooftop under Sharia law. Silly little c***.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jamesey Wandsworth 14 Aug 19 8.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ChrisGC
Absolutely. Take Owen Jones for example I don't even reckon he's gay: he just likes to be in that crowd for the social justice angle. That or he's just unable to get some snatch due to his middle age lesbian body and newly hatched bird eyes. He'd be the first the Communists would shoot being both educated and a journalist (arguable) and definitely the first thrown off a rooftop under Sharia law. Silly little c***.
Nothing is fool-proof - fools are too ingenious |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 14 Aug 19 12.58pm | |
---|---|
Great example of BBC double standards. "UK economy shrinks for the first time since 2012" "https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49290926" "German economy slips back into negative growth"
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 14 Aug 19 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
Great example of BBC double standards. "UK economy shrinks for the first time since 2012" "https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49290926" "German economy slips back into negative growth" I don’t understand your point? Not being facetious.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 15 Aug 19 7.50am | |
---|---|
The kind caring BBC. Retired bank manager has been harassed since 1997 because he doesn't own a TV. This is just one example of many. The BBC takes the attitude that you have to prove to them you don't own a TV licence. Funny that I thought our law is based on the presumption of innocence. If I was this chap I would sue the BBC for harassment and demand they provide the evidence that that they believe proves he has a TV. Over 75's can look forward to plenty of this bully boy tactics from next year.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.