This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
leggedstruggle Croydon 09 Aug 15 11.16am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 09 Aug 2015 10.46am
Fair enough. Booby trapping your home (having moved out)before a migrant moves in is a perfectly reasonable and non extremist position for an individual to take.Being inherently averse to anyone of a different race,religion or ethnicity to you is a perfectly reasonable and non extreme position to take.Anyone who finds such positions distasteful is by definition plainly a Dave Spart type member of the "new left". I've already said what my position on immigration controls for the UK is on here,more than once.I believe in free movement of goods,services and labour within the EU because of the overall benefits.I believe in immigration controls re non EU nationals,based on a points-like system similar to that in operation in Australia.One that seeks not to discriminate on grounds of race,religion or ethnicity.Not too dissimilar to what we already have in place.I do not support illegal migration into the UK. I think EU members may need to review the Schengen arrangement (we never signed up). I believe in compliance with the 1951 UN Convention re asylum.A perhaps "middle of the road" position to anyone not viewing the road from a position anchored firmly on the fringes of the verge of the right hand side of the road. What is your ideal immigration system for 1. Europe and 2. the UK? What is your solution for dealing with "push" factors in countries of origin? What is your solution in respect of migrants/refugees who have already reached Europe's shores? Edited by legaleagle (09 Aug 2015 11.01am) Assuming you are the only poster on here that (allegedly) has housed an asylum seeker, you therefore regard all the other Hol posters as Fascists. You yet again avoid telling us why we need immigration controls at all. You also say that there should be a points system for non-EU immigrants but a total free-for-all for EU immigrants - why the discrimination? Is it on racial grounds? My ideal immigration system? As near as zero immigration as is practical. Not our responsibility to deal with countries of origin apart from encouraging and doing what we can to make them democracies and stop making apologies for odious leaders like Mugabe and Jacob Zuma. Those who have reached Europe's shores? Send them back.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 09 Aug 15 11.20am | |
---|---|
Your first line is in and of itself so off the wall and bonkers it shows the difficulty of any reasoned discussion with you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 09 Aug 15 11.30am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 09 Aug 2015 11.20am
Your first line is in and of itself so off the wall and bonkers it shows the difficulty of any reasoned discussion with you. What is your difficulty in telling us why we need immigration controls at all. Unfortunately we do not have ways of making you answer.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 09 Aug 15 11.39am | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Aug 2015 11.16am
Quote legaleagle at 09 Aug 2015 10.46am
Fair enough. Booby trapping your home (having moved out)before a migrant moves in is a perfectly reasonable and non extremist position for an individual to take.Being inherently averse to anyone of a different race,religion or ethnicity to you is a perfectly reasonable and non extreme position to take.Anyone who finds such positions distasteful is by definition plainly a Dave Spart type member of the "new left". I've already said what my position on immigration controls for the UK is on here,more than once.I believe in free movement of goods,services and labour within the EU because of the overall benefits.I believe in immigration controls re non EU nationals,based on a points-like system similar to that in operation in Australia.One that seeks not to discriminate on grounds of race,religion or ethnicity.Not too dissimilar to what we already have in place.I do not support illegal migration into the UK. I think EU members may need to review the Schengen arrangement (we never signed up). I believe in compliance with the 1951 UN Convention re asylum.A perhaps "middle of the road" position to anyone not viewing the road from a position anchored firmly on the fringes of the verge of the right hand side of the road. What is your ideal immigration system for 1. Europe and 2. the UK? What is your solution for dealing with "push" factors in countries of origin? What is your solution in respect of migrants/refugees who have already reached Europe's shores? Edited by legaleagle (09 Aug 2015 11.01am) Assuming you are the only poster on here that (allegedly) has housed an asylum seeker, you therefore regard all the other Hol posters as Fascists. You yet again avoid telling us why we need immigration controls at all. You also say that there should be a points system for non-EU immigrants but a total free-for-all for EU immigrants - why the discrimination? Is it on racial grounds? My ideal immigration system? As near as zero immigration as is practical. Not our responsibility to deal with countries of origin apart from encouraging and doing what we can to make them democracies and stop making apologies for odious leaders like Mugabe and Jacob Zuma. Those who have reached Europe's shores? Send them back. Send all foreigners home you say? Then you wonder why words like fascist and racist are used!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 09 Aug 15 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 09 Aug 2015 11.39am
Quote leggedstruggle at 09 Aug 2015 11.16am
Quote legaleagle at 09 Aug 2015 10.46am
Fair enough. Booby trapping your home (having moved out)before a migrant moves in is a perfectly reasonable and non extremist position for an individual to take.Being inherently averse to anyone of a different race,religion or ethnicity to you is a perfectly reasonable and non extreme position to take.Anyone who finds such positions distasteful is by definition plainly a Dave Spart type member of the "new left". I've already said what my position on immigration controls for the UK is on here,more than once.I believe in free movement of goods,services and labour within the EU because of the overall benefits.I believe in immigration controls re non EU nationals,based on a points-like system similar to that in operation in Australia.One that seeks not to discriminate on grounds of race,religion or ethnicity.Not too dissimilar to what we already have in place.I do not support illegal migration into the UK. I think EU members may need to review the Schengen arrangement (we never signed up). I believe in compliance with the 1951 UN Convention re asylum.A perhaps "middle of the road" position to anyone not viewing the road from a position anchored firmly on the fringes of the verge of the right hand side of the road. What is your ideal immigration system for 1. Europe and 2. the UK? What is your solution for dealing with "push" factors in countries of origin? What is your solution in respect of migrants/refugees who have already reached Europe's shores? Edited by legaleagle (09 Aug 2015 11.01am) Assuming you are the only poster on here that (allegedly) has housed an asylum seeker, you therefore regard all the other Hol posters as Fascists. You yet again avoid telling us why we need immigration controls at all. You also say that there should be a points system for non-EU immigrants but a total free-for-all for EU immigrants - why the discrimination? Is it on racial grounds? My ideal immigration system? As near as zero immigration as is practical. Not our responsibility to deal with countries of origin apart from encouraging and doing what we can to make them democracies and stop making apologies for odious leaders like Mugabe and Jacob Zuma. Those who have reached Europe's shores? Send them back. Send all foreigners home you say? Then you wonder why words like fascist and racist are used! Well it is a good job I didn't say "send all foreigners home" isn't it Comrade Gusset. By the way how is your answer to why we need any immigration controls at all coming along?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
corkery Cork City 09 Aug 15 6.27pm | |
---|---|
Ever hear of the Horse shoe effect? It's when left wingers go so left that they become fascist.
We'll never die |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 09 Aug 15 10.18pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 09 Aug 2015 10.13am
Quote fed up eagle at 09 Aug 2015 9.51am
Another day, another load of patronising twaddle from illegal Eagle and Dick Gusset. I've given you an solution, stop them leaving their country of origin, but oh no! We simply must have them here so we can lavish money on them, IT IS OUR DESTINY!! Edited by fed up eagle (09 Aug 2015 9.52am)
Edited by legaleagle (09 Aug 2015 10.14am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 09 Aug 15 10.43pm | |
---|---|
Oh the irony.A lecture on tolerance from FUE. You have proposed booby trapping a home occupied by migrants (and likely their kids) and to send the SAS over (I think with you joining them)to mow down all the would-be migrants (all necessarily including kids) in Calais.These struck me as fascistic-like sentiments. Your partner in tolerance LS (as Derben his red-carded predecessor) suggested he'd move away on principle if people of a different religion,race or ethnicity to him moved in near him (regardless of what they were like as people).The very essence of tolerance, ho hum. Somewhat different to simply disagreeing with anyone with a different view to me about immigration controls,the EU,the 1951 Convention or migration,no? How ridiculous of me to be so intolerant by not exhibiting due tolerance towards such sentiments (and,heaven forbid, even viewing them as exhibiting fascistic-like sentiments)and in so doing not realise my views themselves constitute the essence of fascism. But ,if FUE said so ,it must be true and I'll happily withdraw it. Instead,such sentiments as FUE's and LS' strike me as the obnoxious mutterings of extreme neanderthals. Is that ok corkery or does it still make me a horseshoe? Edited by legaleagle (09 Aug 2015 11.15pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 09 Aug 15 11.13pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 09 Aug 2015 10.43pm
Oh the irony.A lecture on tolerance from FUE. You have proposed booby trapping a home occupied by migrants (and likely their kids) and to send the SAS over (I think with you joining them)to mow down all the would-be migrants (and their kids) in Calais.These struck me as fascistic-like sentiments. Your partner in tolerance LS (as Derben his red-carded predecessor) suggested he'd move away if people of a different religion,race or ethnicity to him moved in near him (regardless of what they were like as people).The very essence of tolerance, ho hum. Somewhat different to simply disagreeing with anyone with a different view to me about immigration controls,the EU or migrants,no? How ridiculous of me to be so intolerant by not being tolerant of such sentiments (and viewing them as exhibiting fascistic-like sentiments)and in so doing not realise my views themselves constitute the essence of fascism. But ,if FUE said so ,it must be true and I'll happily withdraw it. Instead,such sentiments as FUE's and LS' strike me as the obnoxious mutterings of extreme neanderthals. Is that ok corkery or does it still make me a horseshoe? Edited by legaleagle (09 Aug 2015 11.08pm) People moving home are Fascists unless Leagleagle approves of their reasons for moving! I'm not sure even Stalin was that controlling. Do you think penalties for moving home for politically incorrect reasons should be enshrined in law? By the way, how is your statement of reasons for why we need immigration controls at all coming along?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 09 Aug 15 11.27pm | |
---|---|
No,I just think people who would not live next to anyone of a different religion,race or ethnicity to them on principle (regardless of what they are like as people) are correctly described as spouting the obnoxious mutterings of extreme neanderthals Though to be fair to you,it seems you make no distinction between actual immigrants and those who have been born here. The question is not why we need border (including immigration) controls of some type or other since you agree with some form of them in principle and so do I (as you would know from my post earlier today).The question is rather what form such controls should take, and why, and causal factors. That is where we very much differ and I very much doubt anything I could write would change your distinctive viewpoint (or vice versa). We also differ plainly in our attitudes towards people of a different religion,race and ethnicity to each of us living here (and indeed likely born here).We further differ on what might be done to reduce outward migration from countries in crisis. In short,we differ.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 10 Aug 15 8.26am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 09 Aug 2015 11.27pm
No,I just think people who would not live next to anyone of a different religion,race or ethnicity to them on principle (regardless of what they are like as people) are correctly described as spouting the obnoxious mutterings of extreme neanderthals Though to be fair to you,it seems you make no distinction between actual immigrants and those who have been born here. The question is not why we need border (including immigration) controls of some type or other since you agree with some form of them in principle and so do I (as you would know from my post earlier today).The question is rather what form such controls should take, and why, and causal factors. That is where we very much differ and I very much doubt anything I could write would change your distinctive viewpoint (or vice versa). We also differ plainly in our attitudes towards people of a different religion,race and ethnicity to each of us living here (and indeed likely born here).We further differ on what might be done to reduce outward migration from countries in crisis. In short,we differ. Edited by legaleagle (10 Aug 2015 12.05am) Neanderthalphobia again - surely that is a hate crime in this day and age. So you restate that we are Fascists if we chose to move house or don't have a diverse, vibrant person of African heritage in the spare room. How long before you have us standing in front of a telescreen for two minutes hate of Farage as the clock strikes thirteen? You say that you agree with some form of immigration control, yet say the question is not why we need them. That is precisely the question. If you have no reasons for controls why would you go to the trouble and cost of having them? Unless you are completely lacking in common sense, you must have some reasons for wanting "controls of some type or other". We merely want to know what those reasons are - why so coy?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 10 Aug 15 8.43am | |
---|---|
Quote corkery at 09 Aug 2015 6.27pm
Ever hear of the Horse shoe effect? It's when left wingers go so left that they become fascist.
The far left are fascists because they want a one party state, perpetual 'revolution' controlled only by themselves, unless you adopt their thought processes you are a '[insert label]-phobe' just because they say so and should you disagree with them, they will threaten to 'smash' you.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.