This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 14 Feb 17 8.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
It's opinion gained from his communist father. Was Cameron told to keep the cheap labour coming in, or is it what he thinks Cameron was told? Labour, when in power, kept telling us we needed the immigrants and migrant workers. Who is right, or more importantly, wrong? Don't spin this back to refugees. That's a separate issue. Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (14 Feb 2017 8.28pm)
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Feb 17 8.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
It's opinion gained from his communist father. Was Cameron told to keep the cheap labour coming in, or is it what he thinks Cameron was told? Labour, when in power, kept telling us we needed the immigrants and migrant workers. Who is right, or more importantly, wrong? Don't spin this back to refugees. That's a separate issue. Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (14 Feb 2017 8.28pm) The current labour leader's view is that stopping exploitation and ensuring a decent wage is paid will help stop this.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Feb 17 9.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
The current labour leader's view is that stopping exploitation and ensuring a decent wage is paid will help stop this. He is delusional.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 14 Feb 17 9.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
The current labour leader's view is that stopping exploitation and ensuring a decent wage is paid will help stop this. It's a noble view. How do you think he could achieve this? Does he have a plan, other than tax the rich, which addresses the problem? I heard rumours of wage capping, but that isn't gonna go far. We live in a dog eat dog world, where the only winner is the alpha. This is not new. And ideology cannot change it. The 'Have's' will always win. The only difference the 'Have not's' can achieve, is to work hard for a pittance. The problems of the moment is that the 'Have not's' of Europe are welcome to whatever pittance is available in this country. Diluting that pittance to the point of poverty. That's not racism, that's survival.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 15 Feb 17 8.49pm | |
---|---|
For those of you still thinking that 'racism' was the root of Brexit, please take heed of the attached link. Another British company will disappear soon: Unfortunately, globalisation brings with it inherent dangers to the lives of a significant proportion of the country. Having what is perceived as a lack of influence over important matters, such as one of the largest manufacturing sites in the U.K. potentially being closed because of a deal between a US company and French company, drives people away from supporting the 'open borders, supranational' project that is the EU. Protectionism offers a degree of hope, albeit I believe protectionism for protectionism's sake is futile. What is the riposte from the federalists? Having a seat at the table provides influence? Pull the other one. At least being out of the club gives us room to manoeuvre that doesn't contradict those weighted 'rules' emanating from Brussels.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 16 Feb 17 2.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
For those of you still thinking that 'racism' was the root of Brexit, please take heed of the attached link. Another British company will disappear soon: Unfortunately, globalisation brings with it inherent dangers to the lives of a significant proportion of the country. Having what is perceived as a lack of influence over important matters, such as one of the largest manufacturing sites in the U.K. potentially being closed because of a deal between a US company and French company, drives people away from supporting the 'open borders, supranational' project that is the EU. Protectionism offers a degree of hope, albeit I believe protectionism for protectionism's sake is futile. What is the riposte from the federalists? Having a seat at the table provides influence? Pull the other one. At least being out of the club gives us room to manoeuvre that doesn't contradict those weighted 'rules' emanating from Brussels. Part-owned by the French govt. As per Ford, they'll probably get an "EU" grant (ie UK taxpayer money) to move production out of the UK. Expect it won't be non-EU Turkey we're gifting our jobs to this time, it'll be the French. That's ok though. The French state part-own our energy suppliers, gas, transport... Ever wonder why we pay so much for all that over here? The joys of "globalisation" . We'll be subsidising their government for Hinkley C as well, if all goes to plan.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 16 Feb 17 12.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Were it not for blogs, Gusset would be robbed of any supporting 'evidence' for some of his more fanciful and crypto-Stalinist notions and impractical, idealistic nonsense.
Hahaha..... another Dermot Masterclass in put downs!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Feb 17 1.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Hahaha..... another Dermot Masterclass in put downs! If anyone should be put down...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 16 Feb 17 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
If anyone should be put down... You sound like Gareth Snell!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Feb 17 3.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
You sound like Gareth Snell! I don't mind Janet Street Porter, he's right on Dianne Abbott. Never seen loose women.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Feb 17 4.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
He is delusional. Raising minimum wage, would arguably help, given that one of the primary factors in low skill manual labour is that the wages have stagnated due to demand being supplied from poorer nations (where the exchange rate makes working for 16-20k a year with no dependents viable in a way that it isn't for UK residents with families or dependents). But the upshot of raising the minimum wage is that it would likely attract higher qualified migrant workers from those same countries, into the same jobs - Which is even worse for those countries (who are already losing degree graduates to the UK to do fairly average jobs). The only beneficiaries from the Freedom of Movement have been corporations. They've garnered a great profit from the fact wages have been suppressed by cheap sources of labour, whilst successive governments (including Labour) have actually cut corporation taxes and allowed many such companies to shelter from tax contributions. So basically, Corporate interests benefitted from cheap labour, tax cuts and tax exemptions, at the expense of British citizens. Meanwhile, countries supplying that labour, have been effectively robbed of skilled labour and the 'cream of the generation'. Unsurprisingly, many of those countries have also seen increasing unrest and problems created, in effect, by the exploitation of Freedom of Movement that's removed 'their best and brightest'.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 16 Feb 17 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Raising minimum wage, would arguably help, given that one of the primary factors in low skill manual labour is that the wages have stagnated due to demand being supplied from poorer nations (where the exchange rate makes working for 16-20k a year with no dependents viable in a way that it isn't for UK residents with families or dependents). But the upshot of raising the minimum wage is that it would likely attract higher qualified migrant workers from those same countries, into the same jobs - Which is even worse for those countries (who are already losing degree graduates to the UK to do fairly average jobs). The only beneficiaries from the Freedom of Movement have been corporations. They've garnered a great profit from the fact wages have been suppressed by cheap sources of labour, whilst successive governments (including Labour) have actually cut corporation taxes and allowed many such companies to shelter from tax contributions. So basically, Corporate interests benefitted from cheap labour, tax cuts and tax exemptions, at the expense of British citizens. Meanwhile, countries supplying that labour, have been effectively robbed of skilled labour and the 'cream of the generation'. Unsurprisingly, many of those countries have also seen increasing unrest and problems created, in effect, by the exploitation of Freedom of Movement that's removed 'their best and brightest'. Very good analysis. I agree with practically all of it - but aren't you in danger of having the whip withdrawn from the comrades for saying it?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.