Sure. I voice-coached Janet Street Porter if you need a reference.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

They've ever been out of it tbf. The tapeworms at Goldman Sachs have seen to that.

Buy Litecoin.

It genuinely fascinates me how people lazily repeat the same "far right" tropes. Go look at the FN's economic policy, and tell me it's "far-right".

She's in for nationalisation of services, increased social spending, higher-rate tax for the rich, she's anti-capitalist and certainly anti-globalist - taking the view that free trade (and the freedom of movement that often comes with it) has been highly detrimental to France.

But, of course, she also wants strict immigration controls. So she's a Nazi, a fascist, and a far-right politician.

Not even interested in defending her, but the desperation to paint anyone to the right of Corbyn (and she is probably to the left of Obama, as she remarked herself) is.... well, tiring and inaccurate.

As for France itself. It's all hyperbole. Just a few lone-wolves...

[Link]

..cough. Ah, liberté!

Fans of the French voting system say it works for the centre against extremes so I think its pretty good.

However the lady must know this and will be softening her stance?

I think her policies will be anything popular.

As indeed are Macron's - he's selling himself as the populist "anti-establishment" choice, whilst amusingly standing for exactly those establishment principles. I wouldn't be surprised if the French fall for his Blair-style slick image.

From Michael Rosen. Very salient points imo.
Well, well, well if ever you wanted an example of what we Marxists call the gap between 'ideology' and 'conditions', this is it! For years, those in power have let it be known that there is something undesirable about immigration. In short, they say that immigrants are a problem - even 'the' problem. If you (the people) are in any way worse off (mentally, emotionally, materially) the fault is immigrants. That's been the story and the press have loved it. We've even had the repeated bogus business of interviewers rushing off and talking solely and obsessively to 'people on the ground' (nearly always old and white) and letting them 'voice their concerns' - ones that the media and government have stirred up over and over and over again even to point of objecting that immigrants speak their own language (what a crime!), practise their own religions (crime again!) and do the lowest paid jobs with the worst conditions whilst simultaneously sponging off 'our' benefits system. All this has been 'ideology' ie a consistent set of untruths, half-truths and a deliberate attempt not to present the whole picture of how immigration supports the kind of economy that the UK has.