Yes he did.

In fact WE's reply is as disingenuous as the link he refers to.

I urge anyone who might believe the suggestion that Biden didn't call this xenophobic to actually click that link and read through it.

It is indeed proof of just how fallacious and deceptive these people are willing to be.

Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Nov 2021 6.33pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I urge everyone to do exactly that. He did call him xenophobic, which he is, but NOT because he introduced travel bans. The accusation was because of his choice of language, notably "China Virus".

It is though evidence just how fallacious and deceptive these people are willing to be. These being those people who falsely accuse Biden.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

But videos of rioters looting and burning can be ignored - you do make me laugh.

Virus's have been named after their region since anyone can remember.

Indeed, if Biden was only referring to one specific act of calling the virus 'China virus' then he would have made that plain in the tweet, which he didn't....and his tweet directly linked to Trump's tweet announcing the travel ban.

Indeed, Biden only chose to make a distinction once he was criticised.

You are just as big a liar as Biden is.....fallacious and deceptive. People can read your site link and see just how honest the kind of people you regard as worthy are.

Oh and get your own descriptions....bleeding lazy copier.

Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Nov 2021 8.59pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Where do you get that idea? Of course not. They don't that show what is happening elsewhere. That's the point.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Careful, you are twisting yourself into a convoluted knot.

Of course, I haven't said nothing happens unless you see it yourself!

What I said was we don't know, in this instance, what was happening elsewhere at that time. It's much more likely the reporter did and chose not to provide footage of it, or his editor cut it. I am merely speculating why that particular statement was made. I don't know if I am right, or not.

The reason I do so is to point out there are other explanations as to why a report like that is broadcast, to the assumed one that people like CNN are trying to hide things at the behest of a left wing conspiracy.

It's that kind of assertion which enrages the right and stirs up the divide. It isn't healthy.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.