Exclusive Steve Parish Q&A

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Exclusive Steve Parish Q&A

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 54 of 70 < 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 >

buzzby West Sussex 02 Jan 11 4.29pm
Quote Eager eagle at 02 Jan 2011 3.18pm Quote buzzby at 02 Jan 2011 2.04pm Can we get back to what the thread is about, and not certain fans continually slagging each other off, and also, some of the stupid posts that have been posted IMO. 1.Whilst we need stability will you be looking for a more experianced Manager who will command the respect of the players and be given time & money to shape his own squad.We also need to keep some of the backroom staff as well. Dougie is one for the future and should be allowed to learn his trade with us, as he does know the club and has the respect of the players.It was also a good move to appoint Steve Kember as Chief Scout.(Possible long term planning) 2.The youth players that we have that have come into the squad have done well. Is it the boards plan to give these players medium to long term contracts to also give us stability and a good long term future. To many times we have sold players just for that extra bit of cash.Two examples John Bostock who is going on loan to all sorts of clubs, and Wayne Routledge who has now had more clubs that Arnold Palmer, and he is still young.They should have been encouraged to stay at Palace.3.It's about time Palace started to realise it's potential as a medium to big club. There is huge potential to attract fans going south from Croydon. What plans do you have to attract more fans. 4.Your comparing our wage bill to Doncaster, Swansea, etc.We are better than that and looking at the division as a whole we are one of the bigger teams (Although you wouldn't think so at the moment).Do you have a wage structure in place that will attract the right sort of players, and maybe reward them for success within in that structure. 5.I know that you are working on this,but how far down the line are you with making the club shop larger and more inviting, with out fans bumping into each other at every turn. Also when i go into shops in Crawley, Horsham,etc,I see other clubs merchandise. What plans are there to possibly get our merchandise into some of these outlets. I know The previous chairman was against this, but I feel that was a big mistake. We didn't sell Bostock as he left without signing a pro contract,and i don't think we sold Routeledge either. We encouraged both to stay but they were greedy b******s and left for the money or thought they were too good for us. Routledge was sold, and Bostock was badly advised. Edited by buzzby (02 Jan 2011 4.29pm) rub a dub dub who's buying the next round in the Pub?
Alert a moderator to this post

buzzby

West Sussex 02 Jan 11 4.29pm

Quote Eager eagle at 02 Jan 2011 3.18pm

Quote buzzby at 02 Jan 2011 2.04pm

Can we get back to what the thread is about, and not certain fans continually slagging each other off, and also, some of the stupid posts that have been posted IMO.

1.Whilst we need stability will you be looking for a more experianced Manager who will command the respect of the players and be given time & money to shape his own squad.We also need to keep some of the backroom staff as well. Dougie is one for the future and should be allowed to learn his trade with us, as he does know the club and has the respect of the players.It was also a good move to appoint Steve Kember as Chief Scout.(Possible long term planning)

2.The youth players that we have that have come into the squad have done well. Is it the boards plan to give these players medium to long term contracts to also give us stability and a good long term future.
To many times we have sold players just for that extra bit of cash.Two examples John Bostock who is going on loan to all sorts of clubs, and Wayne Routledge who has now had more clubs that Arnold Palmer, and he is still young.They should have been encouraged to stay at Palace.3.It's about time Palace started to realise it's potential as a medium to big club. There is huge potential to attract fans going south from Croydon. What plans do you have to attract more fans.

4.Your comparing our wage bill to Doncaster, Swansea, etc.We are better than that and looking at the division as a whole we are one of the bigger teams (Although you wouldn't think so at the moment).Do you have a wage structure in place that will attract the right sort of players, and maybe reward them for success within in that structure.

5.I know that you are working on this,but how far down the line are you with making the club shop larger and more inviting, with out fans bumping into each other at every turn. Also when i go into shops in Crawley, Horsham,etc,I see other clubs merchandise. What plans are there to possibly get our merchandise into some of these outlets. I know The previous chairman was against this, but I feel that was a big mistake.

We didn't sell Bostock as he left without signing a pro contract,and i don't think we sold Routeledge either.
We encouraged both to stay but they were greedy b******s and left for the money or thought they were too good for us.

Routledge was sold, and Bostock was badly advised.

Edited by buzzby (02 Jan 2011 4.29pm)

rub a dub dub who's buying the next round in the Pub?

Alert a moderator to this post

joe_cpfc Basingstoke 02 Jan 11 4.30pm
Quote Prin_cpfc at 01 Jan 2011 10.23pm Why sack Burley two days before a very important match against Preston? What happens if the next manager doesn't do well with such a small squad, will he be sacked as well? I can answer that rediculous question. Because the results during the course of the season were no way near good enough and the Millwall game was obviously the last straw.And the Preston match is very important but so is every single game from now on so what do you do ? give the manager more time to get us deeper in the s*** ? Also the squad is small but there were funds available as stated by the chairmen but they was not put to good use at all.
Alert a moderator to this post

joe_cpfc

Basingstoke 02 Jan 11 4.30pm

Quote Prin_cpfc at 01 Jan 2011 10.23pm

Why sack Burley two days before a very important match against Preston?

What happens if the next manager doesn't do well with such a small squad, will he be sacked as well?

I can answer that rediculous question.
Because the results during the course of the season were no way near good enough and the Millwall game was obviously the last straw.And the Preston match is very important but so is every single game from now on so what do you do ? give the manager more time to get us deeper in the s*** ?
Also the squad is small but there were funds available as stated by the chairmen but they was not put to good use at all.

Alert a moderator to this post

NickinOX Sailing country. 02 Jan 11 4.31pm
Quote penge cpfc at 02 Jan 2011 3.09pm Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered. I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement. I appreciate what CPFC2010 are doing for the club and think they made the right decision but as owners they don't need to justify themselves to a lot of jumped up idiots and, quite honestly, I wish they wouldn't. I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking. Yeah I sort of agree, it's great that they take the time to talk to us, but some one always has to ruin it! I like the fact that SP took the time to come on here. There were some good questions, and I thought he did a good job answering the ones he chose to. Where I agree with you, Saxon, and Cucking, is when all the stupid comments and bickering started. If that can't be controlled in some way, then it might be for the best that SP does not continue to post. If you come to a fork in the road, take it.
Alert a moderator to this post

NickinOX

Sailing country. 02 Jan 11 4.31pm

Quote penge cpfc at 02 Jan 2011 3.09pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm

This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered.

I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement.

I appreciate what CPFC2010 are doing for the club and think they made the right decision but as owners they don't need to justify themselves to a lot of jumped up idiots and, quite honestly, I wish they wouldn't.

I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking.

Yeah I sort of agree, it's great that they take the time to talk to us, but some one always has to ruin it!

I like the fact that SP took the time to come on here. There were some good questions, and I thought he did a good job answering the ones he chose to.

Where I agree with you, Saxon, and Cucking, is when all the stupid comments and bickering started. If that can't be controlled in some way, then it might be for the best that SP does not continue to post.

If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert a moderator to this post

saxoneagle Bromley 02 Jan 11 4.34pm
Quote maxipalace at 02 Jan 2011 4.09pm Quote we_hate_jon_fortune at 02 Jan 2011 3.10pm Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered. I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement. I appreciate what CPFC2010 are doing for the club and think they made the right decision but as owners they don't need to justify themselves to a lot of jumped up idiots and, quite honestly, I wish they wouldn't. I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking. Normally I would disagree but actually in this instance I think you're right. As grateful as I am for SP for coming on and answering questions, I think he unnecessarily opened himself up to a lot of flak on this occasion. The reasons behind the sacking were obvious - results simply haven't been good enough - and that's essentially all he's said. It could have just been done in a press release and saved a lot of time. i think is encouraging that we have an openess about the club, where fans are encouraged to have a say in the running of the club when before we just had jordans autocratic style. We all know whats sort of trouble that lead to. if you dont agree with it why are you openly taking part? come on lets be unique and be a proper community club ; if were a chelsea fan id want to know why wilkins was sacked or hughton at toon. im glad we dont have dictators running our club I didn't openly take part (I read after the event) and I rarely do on these threads. I've posted these thoughts on the BBS before and although I go on the threads out of curiosity, they invariably have a "car crash" feel to them - you know it is going to end badly but you can't look away! This doesn't mean I don't apprecaite what CPFC2010 are trying to achieve at the club and I'm all for open communication but there is a time, a place and a method for it.
Alert a moderator to this post

saxoneagle

Bromley 02 Jan 11 4.34pm

Quote maxipalace at 02 Jan 2011 4.09pm

Quote we_hate_jon_fortune at 02 Jan 2011 3.10pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm

This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered.

I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement.

I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking.

Normally I would disagree but actually in this instance I think you're right. As grateful as I am for SP for coming on and answering questions, I think he unnecessarily opened himself up to a lot of flak on this occasion. The reasons behind the sacking were obvious - results simply haven't been good enough - and that's essentially all he's said. It could have just been done in a press release and saved a lot of time.

i think is encouraging that we have an openess about the club, where fans are encouraged to have a say in the running of the club when before we just had jordans autocratic style. We all know whats sort of trouble that lead to.

if you dont agree with it why are you openly taking part?

come on lets be unique and be a proper community club ; if were a chelsea fan id want to know why wilkins was sacked or hughton at toon. im glad we dont have dictators running our club

I didn't openly take part (I read after the event) and I rarely do on these threads. I've posted these thoughts on the BBS before and although I go on the threads out of curiosity, they invariably have a "car crash" feel to them - you know it is going to end badly but you can't look away!

This doesn't mean I don't apprecaite what CPFC2010 are trying to achieve at the club and I'm all for open communication but there is a time, a place and a method for it.

Alert a moderator to this post

SpikeyMatt Fishing for condiments 02 Jan 11 4.35pm
Nearly 100,000 thread views. Incredible. Hats off to Guntri for keeping the server hamsters spinning in their wheels. Twitter! [Tweet Link] Justin Bieber: the singing amoeba
Alert a moderator to this post

SpikeyMatt

Fishing for condiments 02 Jan 11 4.35pm

Nearly 100,000 thread views.

Incredible. Hats off to Guntri for keeping the server hamsters spinning in their wheels.

Twitter!

[Tweet Link]

Justin Bieber: the singing amoeba

Alert a moderator to this post

saxoneagle Bromley 02 Jan 11 4.36pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Jan 2011 4.31pm Quote penge cpfc at 02 Jan 2011 3.09pm Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered. I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement. I appreciate what CPFC2010 are doing for the club and think they made the right decision but as owners they don't need to justify themselves to a lot of jumped up idiots and, quite honestly, I wish they wouldn't. I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking. Yeah I sort of agree, it's great that they take the time to talk to us, but some one always has to ruin it! I like the fact that SP took the time to come on here. There were some good questions, and I thought he did a good job answering the ones he chose to. Where I agree with you, Saxon, and Cucking, is when all the stupid comments and bickering started. If that can't be controlled in some way, then it might be for the best that SP does not continue to post. I guess that is kind of the point. In future, I'd suggest that CPFC2010 picks a time they will be online to answer questions and then the HOL/BBS start a thread for people to post questions. A moderator, or some elected person, can then sort through these questions and present them to 2010 for direct answers and without all the chit-chat in between which ruined what could've been good. The trouble is, all these type of threads descend the same way.
Alert a moderator to this post

saxoneagle

Bromley 02 Jan 11 4.36pm

Quote NickinOX at 02 Jan 2011 4.31pm

Quote penge cpfc at 02 Jan 2011 3.09pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm

This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered.

I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement.

I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking.

Yeah I sort of agree, it's great that they take the time to talk to us, but some one always has to ruin it!

I like the fact that SP took the time to come on here. There were some good questions, and I thought he did a good job answering the ones he chose to.

I guess that is kind of the point. In future, I'd suggest that CPFC2010 picks a time they will be online to answer questions and then the HOL/BBS start a thread for people to post questions. A moderator, or some elected person, can then sort through these questions and present them to 2010 for direct answers and without all the chit-chat in between which ruined what could've been good. The trouble is, all these type of threads descend the same way.

Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_Guard Kyiv 02 Jan 11 4.37pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 02 Jan 2011 2.58pm Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered. I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement. I appreciate what CPFC2010 are doing for the club and think they made the right decision but as owners they don't need to justify themselves to a lot of jumped up idiots and, quite honestly, I wish they wouldn't. I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking. That's kinda my point of view, too. old gits!!!! its "new age" Live in Melbourne or Victoria, Australia? Support Crystal Palace? Well join the Crystal Palace Melbourne Supporters Club: [Link] Adelaide, South Australia? Join here: [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_Guard

Kyiv 02 Jan 11 4.37pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 02 Jan 2011 2.58pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm

This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered.

I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement.

I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking.

That's kinda my point of view, too.

old gits!!!! its "new age"

Live in Melbourne or Victoria, Australia?
Support Crystal Palace?

Well join the Crystal Palace Melbourne Supporters Club:
[Link]

Adelaide, South Australia? Join here:
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

saxoneagle Bromley 02 Jan 11 4.37pm
Quote SpikeyMatt at 02 Jan 2011 4.35pm Nearly 100,000 thread views. Incredible. Hats off to Guntri for keeping the server hamsters spinning in their wheels. He had Penge running double speed and made Cucking double up on dungeon exercise
Alert a moderator to this post

saxoneagle

Bromley 02 Jan 11 4.37pm

Quote SpikeyMatt at 02 Jan 2011 4.35pm

Nearly 100,000 thread views.

Incredible. Hats off to Guntri for keeping the server hamsters spinning in their wheels.

He had Penge running double speed and made Cucking double up on dungeon exercise

Alert a moderator to this post

SpikeyMatt Fishing for condiments 02 Jan 11 4.41pm
Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 4.36pm Quote NickinOX at 02 Jan 2011 4.31pm Quote penge cpfc at 02 Jan 2011 3.09pm Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered. I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement. I appreciate what CPFC2010 are doing for the club and think they made the right decision but as owners they don't need to justify themselves to a lot of jumped up idiots and, quite honestly, I wish they wouldn't. I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking. Yeah I sort of agree, it's great that they take the time to talk to us, but some one always has to ruin it! I like the fact that SP took the time to come on here. There were some good questions, and I thought he did a good job answering the ones he chose to. Where I agree with you, Saxon, and Cucking, is when all the stupid comments and bickering started. If that can't be controlled in some way, then it might be for the best that SP does not continue to post. I guess that is kind of the point. In future, I'd suggest that CPFC2010 picks a time they will be online to answer questions and then the HOL/BBS start a thread for people to post questions. A moderator, or some elected person, can then sort through these questions and present them to 2010 for direct answers and without all the chit-chat in between which ruined what could've been good. The trouble is, all these type of threads descend the same way. Steve Parish was happy to do it this way - I offered to lock the thread, he asked for it to be left open. He can then pick and choose what he wants to answer from everyone's questions as opposed to being presented with a set chosen by somebody. If he's happy doing it like this, I don't see the need for change. Whilst some comments were unnecessary, it's a public forum, we can't start restricting individuals to what and where they can post, unless they're really being dickish. Appreciate where you're coming from, though. Twitter! [Tweet Link] Justin Bieber: the singing amoeba
Alert a moderator to this post

SpikeyMatt

Fishing for condiments 02 Jan 11 4.41pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 4.36pm

Quote NickinOX at 02 Jan 2011 4.31pm

Quote penge cpfc at 02 Jan 2011 3.09pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm

This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered.

I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement.

I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking.

Yeah I sort of agree, it's great that they take the time to talk to us, but some one always has to ruin it!

I like the fact that SP took the time to come on here. There were some good questions, and I thought he did a good job answering the ones he chose to.

Steve Parish was happy to do it this way - I offered to lock the thread, he asked for it to be left open. He can then pick and choose what he wants to answer from everyone's questions as opposed to being presented with a set chosen by somebody.

If he's happy doing it like this, I don't see the need for change. Whilst some comments were unnecessary, it's a public forum, we can't start restricting individuals to what and where they can post, unless they're really being dickish.

Appreciate where you're coming from, though.

Twitter!

[Tweet Link]

Justin Bieber: the singing amoeba

Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_Guard Kyiv 02 Jan 11 4.41pm
Quote SpikeyMatt at 02 Jan 2011 4.35pm Nearly 100,000 thread views. Incredible. Hats off to Guntri for keeping the server hamsters spinning in their wheels. if only we could get a quarter of these peoples views on seats at Selhurst!!! we would be mega rich!!! Live in Melbourne or Victoria, Australia? Support Crystal Palace? Well join the Crystal Palace Melbourne Supporters Club: [Link] Adelaide, South Australia? Join here: [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_Guard

Kyiv 02 Jan 11 4.41pm

Quote SpikeyMatt at 02 Jan 2011 4.35pm

Nearly 100,000 thread views.

Incredible. Hats off to Guntri for keeping the server hamsters spinning in their wheels.

if only we could get a quarter of these peoples views on seats at Selhurst!!! we would be mega rich!!!

Live in Melbourne or Victoria, Australia?
Support Crystal Palace?

Well join the Crystal Palace Melbourne Supporters Club:
[Link]

Adelaide, South Australia? Join here:
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

EagleEyedAlbert ...too far north of the water. 02 Jan 11 4.47pm
Perhaps very short-term red cards should be introduced in these Q+A's? If someone is clearly affecting the quality/progression of the Q+A, they should be instantly red carded until the Q+A is done or CPFC2010 go offline, where the ban is lifted. The fact that Parish & co come on here and open themelves up to questions is something we should regard, and treat as a privilege and NOT an entitlement, or an opportunity for farsical sniping. Harsh, but it's in the interest of the majority. "IS HE!!?" -Can often be found on HOL Radio chatting Palace-related nonsense: Catch it here, Sunday Nights 8pm: [Link] HOL Radio Twitter: [Link] Me on the Twitter: [Link] "You don't own a dog & bark yourself, do you?"
Alert a moderator to this post

EagleEyedAlbert

...too far north of the water. 02 Jan 11 4.47pm

Send a Private Message to EagleEyedAlbert

Perhaps very short-term red cards should be introduced in these Q+A's?

If someone is clearly affecting the quality/progression of the Q+A, they should be instantly red carded until the Q+A is done or CPFC2010 go offline, where the ban is lifted.

The fact that Parish & co come on here and open themelves up to questions is something we should regard, and treat as a privilege and NOT an entitlement, or an opportunity for farsical sniping.

Harsh, but it's in the interest of the majority.

"IS HE!!?"

-Can often be found on HOL Radio chatting Palace-related nonsense:

Catch it here, Sunday Nights 8pm: [Link]

HOL Radio Twitter: [Link]

Me on the Twitter: [Link]

"You don't own a dog & bark yourself, do you?"

Alert a moderator to this post

Hambo Crawley 02 Jan 11 4.51pm
Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 4.34pm Quote maxipalace at 02 Jan 2011 4.09pm Quote we_hate_jon_fortune at 02 Jan 2011 3.10pm Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered. I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement. I appreciate what CPFC2010 are doing for the club and think they made the right decision but as owners they don't need to justify themselves to a lot of jumped up idiots and, quite honestly, I wish they wouldn't. I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking. Normally I would disagree but actually in this instance I think you're right. As grateful as I am for SP for coming on and answering questions, I think he unnecessarily opened himself up to a lot of flak on this occasion. The reasons behind the sacking were obvious - results simply haven't been good enough - and that's essentially all he's said. It could have just been done in a press release and saved a lot of time. i think is encouraging that we have an openess about the club, where fans are encouraged to have a say in the running of the club when before we just had jordans autocratic style. We all know whats sort of trouble that lead to. if you dont agree with it why are you openly taking part? come on lets be unique and be a proper community club ; if were a chelsea fan id want to know why wilkins was sacked or hughton at toon. im glad we dont have dictators running our club I didn't openly take part (I read after the event) and I rarely do on these threads. I've posted these thoughts on the BBS before and although I go on the threads out of curiosity, they invariably have a "car crash" feel to them - you know it is going to end badly but you can't look away! This doesn't mean I don't apprecaite what CPFC2010 are trying to achieve at the club and I'm all for open communication but there is a time, a place and a method for it. In some ways I understand people's concerns but at the same time I would say the overwhelming majority of people were reassured or at least in some way pacified by having someone explain the situation. In all honesty, I can't see it creating any problems with concerning ourselves over and if people's responses stop it being a worthwhile exercise for Steve then I assume he won't carry on doing it. All things said, people got the chance to hear directly what those in charge thought about the situation and didn't have to carry on needlessly speculating. I much prefer that to having people arguing on for years about an assumed event happening for an assumed reason! HOL Radio Lead Presenter and sampler of processed meats HOL radio - Sunday nights [Link] HOL Radio Twitter: [Tweet Link] My Twitter: [Tweet Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Hambo

Crawley 02 Jan 11 4.51pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 4.34pm

Quote maxipalace at 02 Jan 2011 4.09pm

Quote we_hate_jon_fortune at 02 Jan 2011 3.10pm

Quote saxoneagle at 02 Jan 2011 2.28pm

This thread sums up perfectly why I don't like the "open environment" of club management we have entered.

I prefer the good old days of a press release and statement.

I know I'm pretty much alone in THAT thinking.

if you dont agree with it why are you openly taking part?

come on lets be unique and be a proper community club ; if were a chelsea fan id want to know why wilkins was sacked or hughton at toon. im glad we dont have dictators running our club

This doesn't mean I don't apprecaite what CPFC2010 are trying to achieve at the club and I'm all for open communication but there is a time, a place and a method for it.

In some ways I understand people's concerns but at the same time I would say the overwhelming majority of people were reassured or at least in some way pacified by having someone explain the situation.

In all honesty, I can't see it creating any problems with concerning ourselves over and if people's responses stop it being a worthwhile exercise for Steve then I assume he won't carry on doing it.

All things said, people got the chance to hear directly what those in charge thought about the situation and didn't have to carry on needlessly speculating. I much prefer that to having people arguing on for years about an assumed event happening for an assumed reason!

HOL Radio Lead Presenter and sampler of processed meats

HOL radio - Sunday nights [Link]
HOL Radio Twitter:

[Tweet Link]

My Twitter:

[Tweet Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 54 of 70 < 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Exclusive Steve Parish Q&A

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors