This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 8.06am | |
---|---|
Seems pretty close to mine doesn’t it?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 25 Jan 24 8.11am | |
---|---|
Not really. Where does it say anything about a deterrent which isn't used doesn't deter?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 8.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
I agree with you. The problem is you are ok with people having choice whereas the poster you replied to believes if you don't agree with him you are defective. Untrue. People can hold whatever opinion they like. Even you. And me! Mine is that some opinions are misinformed. As proved by you categorising them as defective. Trust I have cleared that up for you, although I somehow doubt it.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 8.15am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Not really. Where does it say anything about a deterrent which isn't used doesn't deter? Read my post at 9.53 on yesterday. Anything else I have said is about context, not definition.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 25 Jan 24 8.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Read my post at 9.53 on yesterday. Anything else I have said is about context, not definition. Read yours at 8.07 yesterday.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 25 Jan 24 9.01am | |
---|---|
In 2021, an astonishing 66% of Southern Republicans and 50% of independents were in favor of secession. The West Coast also showed strong support for secession but of a different political flavor, this time being mostly supported by Democrats. In this sense, the U.S. is already in more of a precarious situation than the USSR was in early 1991
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 25 Jan 24 10.23am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Untrue. People can hold whatever opinion they like. Even you. And me! Mine is that some opinions are misinformed. As proved by you categorising them as defective. Trust I have cleared that up for you, although I somehow doubt it. So if somone has an opinion you dont like or agree with...its misinformed... Two people can see the same evidence, material and information and come up with two different opinions and that is okay.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Houston Eagle Houston 25 Jan 24 2.40pm | |
---|---|
Opinions are just that a different perspective of 2 people seeing the same thing differently which is fairly normal in everyday life! Now what I personally find very unnerving is when facts (generally a yes/no type answers) get moved into the grey area!! Many political examples include: classified documents, laptops, sexual relationship, email deletion etc! People in positions of power just lie, lie and lie again and that is seen as acceptable! Very difficult to parent the next generation and beyond! All the above enabled by money and influenced by the media!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 10.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Not really. Where does it say anything about a deterrent which isn't used doesn't deter? It doesn’t. Deterrents which don’t deter cannot truly be called deterrents can they? You understand this perfectly well and are just being pedantic. The practicality is that if people are not convinced that something could be used then it won’t deter. Nuclear arsenals deter not because they aren’t regularly used but when they were the results were catastrophic. They were used. Just enough to deter. Walls don’t deter on their own. If machine gunners are going to kill you if you try to climb over then they will. Otherwise people will try to find ways to get over, under or around them. This is a very silly, pointless conversation.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 10.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
So if somone has an opinion you dont like or agree with...its misinformed... Two people can see the same evidence, material and information and come up with two different opinions and that is okay. Untrue. There are many opinions that I might disagree with but can understand and respect. There are others based on misinformation. Two different things.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 10.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Houston Eagle
Opinions are just that a different perspective of 2 people seeing the same thing differently which is fairly normal in everyday life! Now what I personally find very unnerving is when facts (generally a yes/no type answers) get moved into the grey area!! Many political examples include: classified documents, laptops, sexual relationship, email deletion etc! People in positions of power just lie, lie and lie again and that is seen as acceptable! Very difficult to parent the next generation and beyond! All the above enabled by money and influenced by the media! Trump being the worst example in modern times with the serious idea that “alternative facts”:exist. Thus giving him the freedom to declare what’s true and what isn’t. That’s really scary.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 25 Jan 24 10.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It doesn’t. Deterrents which don’t deter cannot truly be called deterrents can they? You understand this perfectly well and are just being pedantic. The practicality is that if people are not convinced that something could be used then it won’t deter. Nuclear arsenals deter not because they aren’t regularly used but when they were the results were catastrophic. They were used. Just enough to deter. Walls don’t deter on their own. If machine gunners are going to kill you if you try to climb over then they will. Otherwise people will try to find ways to get over, under or around them. This is a very silly, pointless conversation. Silly and pointless compared to trying to convince people on a Crystal Palace fansite that a presidential candidate in another country isn't a good choice? OK.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.