You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 24 2024 9.55am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 53 of 311 < 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 >

Topic Locked

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 17 May 14 1.01pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 1.00pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.50pm

[qdoubt kangel at 17 May 2014 12.40pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.27pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 12.23pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.20pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 12.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 11.51am

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 11.47am

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 11.27am

[Link]

Some food for thought...

Shock-horror - George Chesterton, production editor for the Guardian as well as a blogger for the Guardian's Comment is Free and the New Statesman, doesn't like UKIP - who would have thought it.


So you'll criticise the author but not what he's written. Does this mean you agree with it? If not, what in particular do you disagree with in the article and why?

Which particular parts of the general abuse of UKIP and its supporters, and the frantic attempts to divert from the core issue of UKIP - being in the EU - would you like addressed? (Or perhaps the bit about how Labour would fix everything?)

Labour sold their soul to the devil years ago, they won't do jack.

Who do you support (other than Palace - we have at least that in common) then?


I think the Greens sit closely with my philosophies, as do the TUSC - however as a fledgling party they will make no mark.

Having just read their remarkable (to quote George Chesterton) "pick' n' mix policy statement", I would have to agree with you. Of course some 'fledgling parties, like UKIP, do make a mark.


UKIP have been around a while. Did you know a majority of those that support ukip are in favour of renationalisation of the railways? Will ukip address this do you think? I doubt it.

'

---------------------------------------------------

I think there is a good case for nationalising the railways, but agree that a UKIP government would be unlikely to do it. The key reason for supporting UKIP is to escape from the death-grip of the EU. Give them a massive vote in the EU elections to put pressure on the other parties to get out. In the UK General Election vote for a party that can win and promises a referendum - obviously the Tories at the moment (but who knows perhaps Labour will jump on the bandwagon). When we have the referendum, which would almost certainly result in a vote to leave the EU, then once we are out, go back to voting for socialist or green parties if you are daft enough to believe in their 'systems'.


Edited by kangel (17 May 2014 1.00pm)


I'd rather have my eyes gouged out than vote for UKIP. They're forming alliances with European far right fascist parties. Do you really want to give them a mandate to continue this?

Edited by nickgusset (17 May 2014 1.03pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 17 May 14 1.08pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 1.01pm

When we have the referendum, which would almost certainly result in a vote to leave the EU, then once we are out, go back to voting for socialist or green parties if you are daft enough to believe in their 'systems'.

Nick

I am in the "Leave the EU" camp but I dont share your confidence that a referendum would CERTAINLY result in a vote to come out.There will be persuasive arguments put to the people by both sides and there might be many who would view the change with some trepidation.Fear of the unknown and fear of change and all that malarkey !!!!


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
luckybuck Flag 17 May 14 1.13pm Send a Private Message to luckybuck Add luckybuck as a friend

Quote Rudi Hedman at 17 May 2014 11.42am

Immigration isn't the only thing to blame for problems in this country but I don't see the benefit in adding more and more people to the country when it is a problem and there are other problems to address.

With an ageing population we certainly do need more young people in the country, either through immigration or higher birth rates. Are you doing your bit?

Quote
All whilst plenty of pro-immigration voters live in countryside utopia.

Oft repeated but not the full picture. We have no problem accepting that many people struggle to deal with an influx of immigrants into their communities. Apparently people who actually come to apprecciate the commonality they find with people from different backgrounds are simply lying or living in areas of near zero immigrant though. Feeling the impact of infrastructure strain is one thing, but plenty of people on here simply don't like being around people they deem to be 'foreign' in one sense or another. They don't help UKIP, they drag them down.

Edited by luckybuck (17 May 2014 1.39pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 17 May 14 1.21pm

Quote Willo at 17 May 2014 1.08pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 1.01pm

When we have the referendum, which would almost certainly result in a vote to leave the EU, then once we are out, go back to voting for socialist or green parties if you are daft enough to believe in their 'systems'.

Nick

I am in the "Leave the EU" camp but I dont share your confidence that a referendum would CERTAINLY result in a vote to come out.There will be persuasive arguments put to the people by both sides and there might be many who would view the change with some trepidation.Fear of the unknown and fear of change and all that malarkey !!!!



I didn't write that Willo.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 17 May 14 1.25pm

Quote Willo at 17 May 2014 1.08pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 1.01pm

When we have the referendum, which would almost certainly result in a vote to leave the EU, then once we are out, go back to voting for socialist or green parties if you are daft enough to believe in their 'systems'.

Nick

I am in the "Leave the EU" camp but I dont share your confidence that a referendum would CERTAINLY result in a vote to come out.There will be persuasive arguments put to the people by both sides and there might be many who would view the change with some trepidation.Fear of the unknown and fear of change and all that malarkey !!!!


Of course there would be a deluge of propaganda desperately trying to convince the people that coming out of the EU would be the end of the world. However, the people generally have a great deal more common sense and can see what is in front of their noses than they are given credit for. The recent PR referendum shows this, as will the Scottish people rejecting Salmond's blandishments.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 17 May 14 1.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 1.01pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 1.00pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.50pm

[qdoubt kangel at 17 May 2014 12.40pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.27pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 12.23pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.20pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 12.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 11.51am

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 11.47am

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 11.27am

[Link]

Some food for thought...

Shock-horror - George Chesterton, production editor for the Guardian as well as a blogger for the Guardian's Comment is Free and the New Statesman, doesn't like UKIP - who would have thought it.


So you'll criticise the author but not what he's written. Does this mean you agree with it? If not, what in particular do you disagree with in the article and why?

Which particular parts of the general abuse of UKIP and its supporters, and the frantic attempts to divert from the core issue of UKIP - being in the EU - would you like addressed? (Or perhaps the bit about how Labour would fix everything?)

Labour sold their soul to the devil years ago, they won't do jack.

Who do you support (other than Palace - we have at least that in common) then?


I think the Greens sit closely with my philosophies, as do the TUSC - however as a fledgling party they will make no mark.

Having just read their remarkable (to quote George Chesterton) "pick' n' mix policy statement", I would have to agree with you. Of course some 'fledgling parties, like UKIP, do make a mark.


UKIP have been around a while. Did you know a majority of those that support ukip are in favour of renationalisation of the railways? Will ukip address this do you think? I doubt it.

'

---------------------------------------------------

I think there is a good case for nationalising the railways, but agree that a UKIP government would be unlikely to do it. The key reason for supporting UKIP is to escape from the death-grip of the EU. Give them a massive vote in the EU elections to put pressure on the other parties to get out. In the UK General Election vote for a party that can win and promises a referendum - obviously the Tories at the moment (but who knows perhaps Labour will jump on the bandwagon). When we have the referendum, which would almost certainly result in a vote to leave the EU, then once we are out, go back to voting for socialist or green parties if you are daft enough to believe in their 'systems'.


Edited by kangel (17 May 2014 1.00pm)


I'd rather have my eyes gouged out than vote for UKIP. They're forming alliances with European far right fascist parties. Do you really want to give them a mandate to continue this?

Edited by nickgusset (17 May 2014 1.03pm)

Well you seem to have your eyes closed in supporting the TUSC which includes the far left communist parties, the Socialist Workers Party and the Socialist Party.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 17 May 14 1.38pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 1.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 1.01pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 1.00pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.50pm

[qdoubt kangel at 17 May 2014 12.40pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.27pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 12.23pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 12.20pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 12.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 11.51am

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 11.47am

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 11.27am

[Link]

Some food for thought...

Shock-horror - George Chesterton, production editor for the Guardian as well as a blogger for the Guardian's Comment is Free and the New Statesman, doesn't like UKIP - who would have thought it.


So you'll criticise the author but not what he's written. Does this mean you agree with it? If not, what in particular do you disagree with in the article and why?

Which particular parts of the general abuse of UKIP and its supporters, and the frantic attempts to divert from the core issue of UKIP - being in the EU - would you like addressed? (Or perhaps the bit about how Labour would fix everything?)

Labour sold their soul to the devil years ago, they won't do jack.

Who do you support (other than Palace - we have at least that in common) then?


I think the Greens sit closely with my philosophies, as do the TUSC - however as a fledgling party they will make no mark.

Having just read their remarkable (to quote George Chesterton) "pick' n' mix policy statement", I would have to agree with you. Of course some 'fledgling parties, like UKIP, do make a mark.


UKIP have been around a while. Did you know a majority of those that support ukip are in favour of renationalisation of the railways? Will ukip address this do you think? I doubt it.

'

---------------------------------------------------

I think there is a good case for nationalising the railways, but agree that a UKIP government would be unlikely to do it. The key reason for supporting UKIP is to escape from the death-grip of the EU. Give them a massive vote in the EU elections to put pressure on the other parties to get out. In the UK General Election vote for a party that can win and promises a referendum - obviously the Tories at the moment (but who knows perhaps Labour will jump on the bandwagon). When we have the referendum, which would almost certainly result in a vote to leave the EU, then once we are out, go back to voting for socialist or green parties if you are daft enough to believe in their 'systems'.


Edited by kangel (17 May 2014 1.00pm)


I'd rather have my eyes gouged out than vote for UKIP. They're forming alliances with European far right fascist parties. Do you really want to give them a mandate to continue this?

Edited by nickgusset (17 May 2014 1.03pm)

Well you seem to have your eyes closed in supporting the TUSC which includes the far left communist parties, the Socialist Workers Party and the Socialist Party.

Well having a left wing viewpoint I would have more in common with them. That said, my views about the swp are almost as vitriolic as those of ukip.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 17 May 14 1.39pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Being someone who doesn't vote purely because the very nature of partisan politics these days just freaks me out I love the absolute pant wetting about UKIP

I read a post on another forum from some young lovely who's brains where far outweighed by her tits who claimed that UKIPS policy on disabled people 'were the same as Hitlers'

I had no idea Nigel Farage has secretly started UKIP's own T4 programme

Honestly - politics maaaaan

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 17 May 14 1.39pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

It would seem that it's LibLabCon politicians and their lackies who are scared of UKIP, not the electorate.

[Link]

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
luckybuck Flag 17 May 14 1.50pm Send a Private Message to luckybuck Add luckybuck as a friend

Quote Cucking Funt at 17 May 2014 1.39pm

It would seem that it's LibLabCon politicians and their lackies who are scared of UKIP, not the electorate.

[Link]


While people are not scared of most UKIP policies, many are concerned about the voices coming out of UKIP. As happy as many are that UKIP has its moment in the sun ,the party has a perception problem. Threads like this don't help because support from some boils down to silly xenophobic attitudes about not wanting to drink with poles in pubs, or getting off on giving a pass to extreme statements from UKIP representatives rather than concerns about jobs and infrastructure. It's unfortunate.

Edited by luckybuck (17 May 2014 1.50pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 17 May 14 1.51pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Catfish at 17 May 2014 12.09pm

Quote kangel at 17 May 2014 11.47am

Quote nickgusset at 17 May 2014 11.27am

[Link]

Some food for thought...

Shock-horror - George Chesterton, production editor for the Guardian as well as a blogger for the Guardian's Comment is Free and the New Statesman, doesn't like UKIP - who would have thought it.

"Exchange rule by the elite for rule by the mob"

That is exactly right and the potential has always been there. After Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood speech Richard Crossman noted that the reaction among ordinary people was a genuine uprising by the industrial proletariat against the accepted norms of the intelligencia. The truth of the matter is that none of the main political parties actually represent the views of the average Sun or Daily Mail reader. The political chattering classes have nothing but contempt for the simple minded views of the "man on the street".
UKIP have tapped into that constituency and it is now a race to the bottom to see how the main parties adapt their policies to get those votes back.


This is exactly right.

It can be seen in elitist actions like denying the population the option of capital punishment.....When the majority have wanted it for decades.

It can be seen with the elite's rush to join and pay for anything the EU has created....Changing a small but important project into a giant dictatorial white elephant.

We have a representative democracy which means in essence rule by so called elites.....But in truth, rule by wealth.

Meet the new boss, he's the same as the old boss.....It's the same as it ever was but the people just have different accents and call themselves different names.

Not everything the mob believes in I agree with either...For example, the movement again the Iraq war.... but I do recognise that implementation of what the majority wishes (with minority protection) is better than the filtered democracy by elite that we in reality get.

Politicians have too much power and cock everything up...I'm not sure that it wouldn't be better if we just had a civil service and politicians just acted as advertisers fir policies that the public then voted for.....Changing it from power by elite to power by the politically active within the population....Far better representation and creating a real energizing of politics.

No more government with their vested interests and short termism....No more elections.

Edited by Stirlingsays (17 May 2014 2.23pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 17 May 14 2.55pm Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

[Link]

This made me chuckle. Farage absolutely decimated on LBC.

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 53 of 311 < 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic