Really? You seem to do it rather a lot.

What on earth does “Third worldist ideology are very much a minority position” mean?

It seems to me to be just an assembly of random words jumbled together to give an appearance of a superior intellect.

Maybe this helps:-

[Link]

That though has nothing to do with what follows the jumble. Confused and confusing.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I have no idea. It was a strategic commercial decision. They would only been able to assess the outcome much later. Farage’s opportunity to get banking services elsewhere was not impacted. Banks are either commercial businesses or they aren’t. They aren’t public utilities. They are free to deal with whoever they wish on whatever grounds they decide, unless they break a discrimination law in the process and when this happened they didn’t.

Corbyn I can imagine getting the same treatment. He is another Marmite character. Keith Chegwin or the Chuckle brothers might be annoying but I don’t think in quite the same way.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

No, I'd say that, sometimes deliberately, not recognising clear and obvious cultural and behavioural issues and differences between people who also just happen to look a little different is the problem.
Murder, knife crime, street crime, grooming gangs, honour killings, gang activity massively disproportionately committed by a small percentage of the population who are of various immigrant origins.
No one wants to deal with this or acknowledge the root causes because of who they are.

As usual, your assertion is backwards.

So you see banks as a pub analogy, where they can legally refuse anyone, rather than a public utility, who can refuse no-one save those with poor credit history etc.?

This I submit sits somewhere in between but much closer to the public utility. Once de-banked, it may effect credit history; you will need to make wholesale alterations to your affairs in order to ensure mortgage, utilities, rent etc. are paid; there is a risk of missed payments and adverse credit events; and there is the general humiliation of being publicly declared persona non grata just because you are a c**t.

If my understanding is correct he wasn’t even “de-banked”! He was advised he no longer qualified for their “elite”:account with Coutts but offered one with their mainstream bank. The one we all use.

So if you want a pub analogy more like asking a smoker to go to a designated area where he won’t offend other smokers. Not throwing them out.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.