You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 23 2024 3.23pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 52 of 435 < 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 >

  

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 13 Oct 20 5.33pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by mezzer

An article from Bloomberg today. Quite long but relevant:

[Link]

"Frances Cairncross, a politically neutral economist who led a review into the the U.K.’s news industry, agrees. “The BBC could do an awful lot more to reflect the views of people on the right of center,” she said recently. The director-general wants to widen newsroom diversity, including finding people from white working class backgrounds. But that will take years to have an impact."

They'll just say that Stacey Solomon votes Tory.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Oct 20 6.28pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

Oh dear. You seem determined to ignore the perfectly reasonable point I had made, and your first paragraph is just silly.

Is this the point you are referring to?

"To take an obvious example, the BBC's sports staff don't need to know what's happening in the stock market, or the arts, or in the US election, or in North Korea."

If so my response was addressed to it and perfectly reasonable in the context of the original complaint about the costs.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 13 Oct 20 9.14pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

the BBC's sports staff don't need to know what's happening in the stock market, or the arts, or in the US election, or in North Korea."


...i bet their sport's experts are all very familiar with the writings of Germaine greer , Karl Marx and Andrea Dworkin ?

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 15 Oct 20 8.31am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

Oh dear. You seem determined to ignore the perfectly reasonable point I had made, and your first paragraph is just silly.

Don’t know why you bothered mate! This is Wissie

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Oct 20 10.46am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

Don’t know why you bothered mate! This is Wissie

I don't know why you are commenting!

I asked him to explain what he meant as I thought I had answered it. No response yet

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Belmont Flag 15 Oct 20 10.55am Send a Private Message to Belmont Add Belmont as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

So what do you think they should do? Employ a few extra staff to cut and paste, or photocopy, those sections only relevant to each employee? I suspect the cost would be greater than just supplying the whole paper.

In any case you can often stumble over something interesting and relevant in the oddest of places,

Who knows, maybe the taxman already extracts their pound of flesh from all, or some, of the staff.


As it happens out of interest there are companies out there who do just that for other companies that need specific articles in any publication, a friend of mine used to wok for one.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 15 Oct 20 11.49am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I don't know why you are commenting!

I asked him to explain what he meant as I thought I had answered it. No response yet

It’s called a discussion forum, I was giving him some advice. Lucky you never comment on discussions between other posters isn’t it

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
JRW2 Flag Dulwich 15 Oct 20 2.34pm Send a Private Message to JRW2 Add JRW2 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Is this the point you are referring to?

"To take an obvious example, the BBC's sports staff don't need to know what's happening in the stock market, or the arts, or in the US election, or in North Korea."

If so my response was addressed to it and perfectly reasonable in the context of the original complaint about the costs.

No. Over and out.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 15 Oct 20 2.43pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

No. Over and out.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 Oct 20 8.03am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

George Osbourne is being touted as the next Chairman of the BBC.

[Link]

I think he would be a good match for them, a Remainer in charge at the BBC, what's not to like.

And for people like me he has all the qualities that you would expect in somebody running the BBC. He failed as a politician then failed as a newspaper editor so I think he's going for the hat trick.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 26 Oct 20 3.33pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Newspapers splashed with articles about people not paying the license fee.


it seems the groundswell of dislike the BBC have garnered has finally come home to roost.

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 29 Oct 20 2.17pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

BBC enforces new rules on presenters

[Link]

We done to the DG but I don't understand why this was not in place already.

I worked for a major corporate and we had all sorts of rules about not talking to the press and what you could and couldn't do in the way of political activism. I suspect most major corporations have the same rules to protect their brand.

You would think a corporation that has based it's identity on impartiality would have the strongest of all rules? Anyway the DG is correct these presenters have been damaging the Beebs reputation and it has to stop. If you want to campaign join another organisation.

I agree that presenters need to seek approval for outside jobs (same as my company) but oddly I am not bothered about how much they are paid for those. If you allow Naga Munchetty to do ads for a major bank they will pay her a lot the question is should she be allowed to do them not how much she is paid.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 52 of 435 < 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)