This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Kermit8 Hevon 11 Oct 14 11.19pm | |
---|---|
There's a scene in Fahrenheit 9/11 which was filmed at a very high end business conference and the speaker and the big corporates were all being very self-congratulatory on how much money they would be making in Iraq. This was around 2003/4. It wasn't just about oil. There were plenty of bucks to be made through other ventures out there whilst 20 year olds from Ohio were having their legs blown off defending 'freedom'.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 11 Oct 14 11.29pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 11 Oct 2014 11.11pm
Quote TUX at 11 Oct 2014 11.03pm
Do your history regarding the Bush family.
Oh please, I probably know more about them than you do. You obviously don't bud as you would've mentioned their families historical banking history. You know, it's the reason that they are where they are
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 11 Oct 14 11.30pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 11 Oct 2014 11.07pm
Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 10.56pm
I fear you may be the one who is misinformed.I'd say it speaks for itself as a factor, regardless of whether you might think there are others. As for "nonsense", I see you equate an outlet within a country which might be on the more liberal (in American terms, less right wing) end of the particular spectrum in question as being "anti-American", says much more about your outlook than mine. Akin to equating any healthy debate within a liberal democracy on government policies and aims, as being anti-American. Senator McCarthy would be proud of you. You then take that lovely analysis across and apply it to the Guardian by analogy. Get a life! It may espouse views you don't like and raise issues you don't like, but anti-British....boy, your views and mine of what might be anti-British and outside the democratic give and take of a liberal democracy, sure are different to mine.Next thing you know it'll be anti British not to want taxi drivers to have a wear uniforms, like in UKIP's last election manifesto. Incidentally, I was in the US when the troops went into Iraq, watching CNN. "Anti-American" coverage? My asre.
Of course CNN isn't anti American.....You used those words to describe what you feel CNN isn't. I simply stated the fact that in US terms it's about as left wing as they get....While admittedly finding amusement in your depiction of CNN. How unusual for you to be watching CNN legal. I was always interested in the claims of people about the motivations for the Iraqi war.....So I actually researched it....You see my arguments in the post. I refer to facts legal.....Not quotes or biased narrative.
Sorry. But, even by your standards, equating CNN as anti-American and by extension the Guardian as anti-British at the outset of your post did rather take the shine off the rest of your post as being anything other than a mere shadow of the crème de la crème! Thanks for taking an interest in my viewing habits Stirling.Usually, I now watch Fox News for infotainment purposes when in the US; it beats the comedy programmes hands down You characterised CNN as being anti-American...don't back track, my neo McCarthyite friend I note that on your analysis, we dismiss the quoted opinions of the former head of the US Reserve Bank and a senior US military figure of the time about the intention behind invading. Maybe you think they have been corrupted by CNN and The Guardian As for facts,see this as an example, re Halliburton, a US oil services company, of which Dick Cheney, Vice President under Bush Jr, was formerly CEO. What a completely unexpected out of the blue coincidence. Edited by legaleagle (11 Oct 2014 11.35pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Oct 14 11.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 11 Oct 2014 11.19pm
There's a scene in Fahrenheit 9/11 which was filmed at a very high end business conference and the speaker and the big corporates were all being very self-congratulatory on how much money they would be making in Iraq. This was around 2003/4. It wasn't just about oil. There were plenty of bucks to be made through other ventures out there whilst 20 year olds from Ohio were having their legs blown off defending 'freedom'. If your views on the Iraqi war were formed or informed by Fahrenheit 9/11.....Well you're going to see it as all rather black and white. I contend.....that the truth is far more grey and that.....as in most things....far less planned....History is made more often by risk, bluff and chance than by anything else. So you think corporate chancers looking for a buck from government policy has some relevance to why this war started? Oh please Kermy. Campaigns for an Iraqi war were on going in republican circles since before 96. We have letters written to Bush himself way way before his election......Letters also asking for aggressive stances towards China and Russia. It happens all the time.....Bush just had no interest in foreign wars until that fateful day that I personally will never forget. After that the dreadful merry-go-round was open to everyone.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 11 Oct 14 11.44pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 11 Oct 2014 11.33pm
Quote Kermit8 at 11 Oct 2014 11.19pm
There's a scene in Fahrenheit 9/11 which was filmed at a very high end business conference and the speaker and the big corporates were all being very self-congratulatory on how much money they would be making in Iraq. This was around 2003/4. It wasn't just about oil. There were plenty of bucks to be made through other ventures out there whilst 20 year olds from Ohio were having their legs blown off defending 'freedom'. If your views on the Iraqi war were formed or informed by Fahrenheit 9/11.....Well you're going to see it as all rather black and white. I contend.....that the truth is far more grey and that.....as in most things....far less planned....History is made more often by risk, bluff and chance than by anything else. So you think corporate chancers looking for a buck from government policy has some relevance to why this war started? Oh please Kermy. Campaigns for an Iraqi war were on going in republican circles since before 96. We have letters written to Bush himself way way before his election......Letters also asking for aggressive stances towards China and Russia. It happens all the time.....Bush just had no interest in foreign wars until that fateful day that I personally will never forget. After that the dreadful merry-go-round was open to everyone. Bush couldn't tell what day it was let alone what he was meant to be doing ! This is the reason that this idiot was the most funded in US electoral history. He done exactly what he was told to do. (but in a less eloquent manner I guess)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Oct 14 11.48pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
Thanks for taking an interest in my viewing habits Stirling.Usually, I now watch Fox News for infotainment purposes when in the US; it beats the comedy programmes hands up I have to admit mate.....I do for the exact same reason.....Some of that Fox stuff is mad as a march hare. Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
You characterised CNN as being anti-American...don't back track, my neo McCarthyite friend Just playing and having fun really....If I were serious I'd describe CNN as probably the least right wing popular TV news outlet......Which makes it broadly Conservative with a small 'C' in British terms. I've always supported the neo con position.....Was I right to....maybe...maybe not....that's the mask I nailed the flag to. In reality the whole thing is still playing out....And I'll honestly say this. Whatever scenario leads to the least overall death is the one I back......But therein lies lots of detail. Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
I note that on your analysis, we dismiss the quoted opinions of the former head of the US Reserve Bank and a senior US military figure of the time about the intention behind invading. Maybe you think they have been corrupted by CNN and The Guardian I simply express the fact that they don't know why Bush went to war anymore than you do. Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
As for facts,see this as an example, re Halliburton, a US oil services company, of which Dick Cheney, Vice President under Bush Jr, was formerly CEO. What a completely unexpected out of the blue coincidence. So Bush went to war in Iraq so Cheney could make some money? That's a bit weak legal don't you think? A connection isn't evidence for causation. I don't and have never denied that once the war was decided upon that Bush and co looked to have their friends take up contracts.....Security and arms firms made money....No doubt about it. But oil....Na...If it were they didn't do the contracts properly.....If oil were the real reason for the war then those contracts would have been water or rather oil tight. But be in no doubt.....No twin towers, no war. The Bush doctrine wasn't pre-planned.....The neo cons won their war with Bush for understandable reasons. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Oct 2014 11.57pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Seth On a pale blue dot 11 Oct 14 11.54pm | |
---|---|
Quote aquickgame2 at 11 Oct 2014 8.11pm
Quote Seth at 11 Oct 2014 4.37pm
Quote aquickgame2 at 11 Oct 2014 4.27pm
Quote Forest Hillbilly at 11 Oct 2014 3.43pm
I feel , myself, slightly repulsed that 'the Allies' intervened in Iraq when oil was at stake. We are 'watching' massacres already happened by IS as passive bystanders. Gang rapes, public beheadings and crucifixions have already happened, and all seem about to happen again. It makes me slightly sick to know that people are suffering at the hands if IS, when the Western powers seem well-equipped to deal with the threat. And deal with it absolutely. am I wrong ? Too simplistic, perhaps, but who else will 'sort it' ?
Didn't take long to find these: Edited by Seth (11 Oct 2014 4.41pm)
But they are all Kurds protesting,where are the other thousands of people who are not Kurds on the streets
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 11 Oct 14 11.54pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 11 Oct 2014 11.48pm
Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
Thanks for taking an interest in my viewing habits Stirling.Usually, I now watch Fox News for infotainment purposes when in the US; it beats the comedy programmes hands up I have to admit mate.....I do for the exact same reason.....Some of that Fox stuff is mad as a march hare. Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
You characterised CNN as being anti-American...don't back track, my neo McCarthyite friend Just playing and having fun really....If I were serious I'd describe CNN as probably the least right wing popular TV news outlet......Which makes it broadly Conservative with a small 'C' in British terms. I've always supported the neo con position.....Was I right too....maybe...maybe not....that's the mask I nailed the flag too. In reality the whole thing is still playing out....And I'll honestly say this. Whatever scenario leads to the least overall death is the one I back......But therein lies lots of detail. Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
I note that on your analysis, we dismiss the quoted opinions of the former head of the US Reserve Bank and a senior US military figure of the time about the intention behind invading. Maybe you think they have been corrupted by CNN and The Guardian I simply express the fact that they don't know why Bush went to war anymore than you do. Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 11.30pm
As for facts,see this as an example, re Halliburton, a US oil services company, of which Dick Cheney, Vice President under Bush Jr, was formerly CEO. What a completely unexpected out of the blue coincidence. So Bush went to war in Iraq so Cheney could make some money? That's a bit weak legal don't you think? A connection isn't evidence for causation. I don't and have never denied that once the war was decided upon that Bush and co looked to have their friends take up contracts.....Security and arms firms made money....No doubt about it. But oil....Na...If it were they didn't do the contracts properly.....If oil were the real reason for the war then those contracts would have been water or rather oil tight. But be in no doubt.....No twin towers, no war. The Bush doctrine wasn't pre-planned.....The neo cons won their war with Bush for understandable reasons.
Cough. Have you done the homework I set you regarding the Bush family and their BANKING HERITAGE yet bud? 9oc Monday morn or detention awaits!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Oct 14 11.55pm | |
---|---|
Quote TUX at 11 Oct 2014 11.44pm
Bush couldn't tell what day it was let alone what he was meant to be doing ! This is the reason that this idiot was the most funded in US electoral history. He done exactly what he was told to do. (but in a less eloquent manner I guess)
If it's true all those capitalists telling him what to do must really have wanted America to lose money then and go into recession then. Bush lost most of them money.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Oct 14 11.56pm | |
---|---|
Quote TUX at 11 Oct 2014 11.54pm
Cough. Have you done the homework I set you regarding the Bush family and their BANKING HERITAGE yet bud? 9oc Monday morn or detention awaits! Educate me mate....let it all out for us to see.....I like to see a bit of 'crazy' on a Saturday night.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Seth On a pale blue dot 12 Oct 14 12.07am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 7.49pm
Quote Seth at 11 Oct 2014 6.37pm
Quote legaleagle at 11 Oct 2014 5.55pm
Indeed, Kurds are taking to the streets in Europe (and seemingly being opposed by local salafists in Germany and killed as per norm in Turkey) but for some reason the Stop the War Coalition in London seems less outraged when the war is against the Kurds and the Zarzidis, and those tens of thousands moved by events in Gaza aren't taking to the streets in the same way in London or Paris every week... Doesn't mean events in Gaza aren't awful or that many, including on here, aren't outraged by both events, but nonetheless interesting the lesser reaction among some of those on the streets re Gaza last summer and so outraged by that, when the perpetrators now aren't the devil incarnate Israelis but rather an example of something a little more akin to real genocide. And to those who might say the difference is that ISIS aren't a state, and that we aren't supporting them, those Turkish government cnuts who have been cynically offering support to ISIS and sitting back letting the Kurds get it in the neck (and a long history of brutally repressing their own kurds) , are a state and indeed our own NATO allies... and are (or were as of 2012) listed as a "priority market" by our government arms sales support unit... Edited by legaleagle (11 Oct 2014 6.27pm) One reason for the smaller protests may be that Israel has been massacring Palestinians for decades and there are, rightly, well organised and popular movements resisting their aggression. These people can be mobilised quickly when Israel decides to "cut the grass" (murder palestinian men women and children) again. The recent events in Syria and Iraq are a newer phenomenon and do not have organised movements opposing them built up over decades with global networks of activists. Nevertheless there ARE people protesting in support of the Kurds and others threatened by ISIS and denigrating them by comparing them unfavourably with the likes of the Palestinian resistance and its supporters does them no favours whatsoever.
Some of what you write explains a part of why. But not fully. The Kurds have been being massacred (in the true sense of the word) for many, many decades,longer than the Israel -Palestine conflict. During the First World War, the Turks ethnically cleansed up to 700,000 Kurds, around half of whom later died. Taking Mr Galloway (Respect) as an example .Israelis are the devil. He won't even share a platform with an Israeli citizen. Yet the regime (Saddam) which killed around 5,000 Kurds (and many more dead in later years from diseases and birth defects etc)with gas, seemed less of a problem...Imagine if 5,000 Palestinians had been killed with gas by the Israelis... puts the term "massacre" into perspective. It's estimated that in Iraq in 1986-89,around 182,000 Kurdish civilians were killed by the regime and 2,000 villages destroyed. The phenomenon of repression of the Kurds is far from new, but has never aroused public interest in the same way as the plight of the Palestinians. Blame in part lack of media access, lack of cross-border funding of support networks.. and the elevation by some of the Israelis to a near unique devil incarnate status. Similarly, the potential for the likely outcome of the global spread of salafist jihadism (not necessarily in Iraq admittedly) is not something only arising in the past year...if anyone wanted to look hard enough ...and yes, "we" certainly played our part in incubating the baby... It would be interesting to know the extent to which the main support networks which mobilised so successfully in France and the UK in the summer re Gaza, have been bombarding their supporters with similar outrage re ISIS. After all, human rights and "massacres" are indivisible. Many many good people (such as you) are rightly outraged by Isis and by Israel's actions in Gaza and other human rights abuses world wide. But, I am still left with a weary cynicism about the actual commitment to universal human rights of elements of those who took to the streets so readily against the devil incarnate Israel only weeks ago in France (with spin offs chanting anti-Semitic slogans and vandalising Jewish shops and synagogues)but seem, for some reason, to not abhor in quite the same way, salafist jihadi excesses on a far worse scale.
It's a common complaint, which you echo, that because people protest against one thing they think is wrong, it's then a given that they should protest against everything that everybody thinks is wrong. If they don't, the argument goes, then either the thing they were protesting about in the first place is invalid, or they should really be protesting about something else, or they're actually just hiding the fact they hate someone else altogether. Supporters of Israel often say; "you protest about us killing Palestinians, but what about the Iranians/Saudis/Iraqis (delete as applicable) over there, they're killing just as many people as us, and the people they're killing are muslims, but you don't protest about them. Therefore you are anti-Israel." An extension of this, often used to stifle debate is: "If you are anti-Israel then you are anti-Semitic." legal I know you have criticised Israeli policy before on here and you don't support their wars on Gaza and against the Palestinians. But just because there aren't the same level of protests against ISIS as there are against Israel over Gaza doesn't delegitimise the Kurds' and their supporters' aims, not does it spring from some kind of "devil incarnate Israel" mindset which I feel only serves to deflect criticism of Israel's actions, and distract from the actual issue here, which is a murderous death cult on the rise in the middle east which needs to be comprehensively tackled and defeated.
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 12 Oct 14 12.18am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 11 Oct 2014 11.55pm
Quote TUX at 11 Oct 2014 11.44pm
Bush couldn't tell what day it was let alone what he was meant to be doing ! This is the reason that this idiot was the most funded in US electoral history. He done exactly what he was told to do. (but in a less eloquent manner I guess)
If it's true all those capitalists telling him what to do must really have wanted America to lose money then and go into recession then. Bush lost most of them money. More homework I guess?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.