This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
est1905 22 Jan 24 5.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
The concern is if injuries don't improve he has shown no idea of how to work around it. He hasn't tried untested players to any great degree, he hasn't come up with any new offensive tactics, he hasn't gone down the route of a more physical and aggressive approach, or worked out a way to go more direct. The one change was to go 3-4-3 when we don't have any wingbacks, Schlupp is not a right winger and he puts Eze out on the left. We are no longer that hard to break down, we can't defend setpieces and our offensive set pieces have no creativity at all. I just don't see anything that he's getting right at the moment. Sometimes changing the manager just gives the place a boost. It's not always fair on the manager, but it works so often if you make the right choice. The fact is any half decent manager will keep us up when the core of the team is fit. There is this tired old argument that the younger/fringe players are not getting a chance. I dont agree. Franca is one example where he has had a lot of cameos now. He may be young and settling into a foreign country but sooner or later you have to grab that chance and make the position your own. Play so well its hard if not impossible for the manager to drop you, Even when everyone is fit. Franca just has not done that. Neither has Rak=Saki when fit. None of them have. Roy (and to a lesser degree Ray and Paddy) see these players day in day out on the training ground. Do you not honestly think that in view of our injuries/absences if they saw even a glimmer of magic from any of these lads that they wouldn't start and get a full 90 minutes? Of course they would. Its time to face facts, At the moment they are not up to it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 22 Jan 24 6.01pm | |
---|---|
To say it's a fact that the young players are not good enough is unproven.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 22 Jan 24 6.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
To say it's a fact that the young players are not good enough is unproven. Agreed. Let alone having a manager who takes a snide sideswipe at the young players and at his next press conference had to issue a grovelling apology.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 22 Jan 24 6.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
To say it's a fact that the young players are not good enough is unproven. You make a very sound point. Edited by Jacey (22 Jan 2024 6.23pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 22 Jan 24 6.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by est1905
There is this tired old argument that the younger/fringe players are not getting a chance. I dont agree. Franca is one example where he has had a lot of cameos now. He may be young and settling into a foreign country but sooner or later you have to grab that chance and make the position your own. Play so well its hard if not impossible for the manager to drop you, Even when everyone is fit. Franca just has not done that. Neither has Rak=Saki when fit. None of them have. Roy (and to a lesser degree Ray and Paddy) see these players day in day out on the training ground. Do you not honestly think that in view of our injuries/absences if they saw even a glimmer of magic from any of these lads that they wouldn't start and get a full 90 minutes? Of course they would. Its time to face facts, At the moment they are not up to it.
Some will say Ozoh hasn't done much since. However, how many of Hodgson's favoured experienced pros make a meaningful contribution when they're given 10 minute cameos? Answer = none; so why expect the youngsters to break into the team when they're only given those kinds of opportunities? IMO, the real problem is Hodgson's rigid system which he only trusts his seasoned pros to play and at present some of them are making a pig's ear of it and dragging down our better players as a result. Even without Olise, Ayew and Doucoure, we don't have a squad that's relegation quality. It's better than that, but not, it seems in Hodgson's hands.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elphers40 Sunny South Coast 22 Jan 24 6.51pm | |
---|---|
The fact that SP hasn’t pulled the trigger suggests to me that the number 1 target (they must have identified one by now as they know Roy leaves at the end of the season) either isn’t available (as he’s at a club already) or has already indicated that he wasn’t ready to take the job until the end of this season. If that person was Cooper or Loputegi there would be little reason now not to bring him in (other than some sense of loyalty to Roy). My hope is that there have been discussions with the preferred option and that he feels he wants to see the season out with his current team. I just don’t want to be going into every game so focused on how best to stop the opposition threat. For once let’s look at how we can get our exciting players on the ball and look to hurt the opposition
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elphers40 Sunny South Coast 22 Jan 24 6.54pm | |
---|---|
Oops! Hopefully he can go with some dignity.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Plaistow Eagle 22 Jan 24 7.23pm | |
---|---|
He Originally posted by doombear
Some will say Ozoh hasn't done much since. However, how many of Hodgson's favoured experienced pros make a meaningful contribution when they're given 10 minute cameos? Answer = none; so why expect the youngsters to break into the team when they're only given those kinds of opportunities? IMO, the real problem is Hodgson's rigid system which he only trusts his seasoned pros to play and at present some of them are making a pig's ear of it and dragging down our better players as a result. Even without Olise, Ayew and Doucoure, we don't have a squad that's relegation quality. It's better than that, but not, it seems in Hodgson's hands. Nail on head..!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elphers40 Sunny South Coast 22 Jan 24 7.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by doombear
Some will say Ozoh hasn't done much since. However, how many of Hodgson's favoured experienced pros make a meaningful contribution when they're given 10 minute cameos? Answer = none; so why expect the youngsters to break into the team when they're only given those kinds of opportunities? IMO, the real problem is Hodgson's rigid system which he only trusts his seasoned pros to play and at present some of them are making a pig's ear of it and dragging down our better players as a result. Even without Olise, Ayew and Doucoure, we don't have a squad that's relegation quality. It's better than that, but not, it seems in Hodgson's hands. Couldn’t agree more. Far Too Cautious/negative in every way - this approach is totally sucking the fun out of watching the Palace!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Brinscalleagle2 Brinscall 22 Jan 24 8.01pm | |
---|---|
None of us really know if by playing some of our more advanced youngsters in their favoured positions that they will or will not make a difference either under Roy or a new manager . The drive for them to play is more based on the fact that the first team is not performing and we may as well give them a try rather than they have demonstrated their ability to deserve a place. There must also be a risk in bringing in a new manager with a new style and hope that the fringe players will miraculously fit what he wants. I can see no point in bringing in a new manager now unless it is The Manager that the Board have been targeting from the very beginning. He would then be able to shape the squad from now on and prepare us for continued life in the Premiership or back in the Championship depending on his own abilities and the quality of the squad he inherited from Roy. Difficult decision but I am on the side of keeping Roy until the end of the season unless their chosen Manager is available right now and willing to take the risk and take the job now. COYP
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Aray South London 22 Jan 24 8.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by est1905
There is this tired old argument that the younger/fringe players are not getting a chance. I dont agree. Franca is one example where he has had a lot of cameos now. He may be young and settling into a foreign country but sooner or later you have to grab that chance and make the position your own. Play so well its hard if not impossible for the manager to drop you, Even when everyone is fit. Franca just has not done that. Neither has Rak=Saki when fit. None of them have. Roy (and to a lesser degree Ray and Paddy) see these players day in day out on the training ground. Do you not honestly think that in view of our injuries/absences if they saw even a glimmer of magic from any of these lads that they wouldn't start and get a full 90 minutes? Of course they would. Its time to face facts, At the moment they are not up to it. Sorry what is tired is the same old approach. We are losing anyway so lets give the youngsters a go. And I dont think you can expect a snatched 10 mins to be enough time to form a good opinion. Players need time on the pitch - how may PL starts has Franca had? By the way - he played well vs ManC. Or Ozoh? Again he has played well when given a chance. Ahamada he was well rated at Stuttgart. He has pace - Hughes (who I like) does not. Why play a defender in midfield instead?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
robdave2k 22 Jan 24 9.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by est1905
There is this tired old argument that the younger/fringe players are not getting a chance. I dont agree. Franca is one example where he has had a lot of cameos now. He may be young and settling into a foreign country but sooner or later you have to grab that chance and make the position your own. Play so well its hard if not impossible for the manager to drop you, Even when everyone is fit. Franca just has not done that. Neither has Rak=Saki when fit. None of them have. Roy (and to a lesser degree Ray and Paddy) see these players day in day out on the training ground. Do you not honestly think that in view of our injuries/absences if they saw even a glimmer of magic from any of these lads that they wouldn't start and get a full 90 minutes? Of course they would. Its time to face facts, At the moment they are not up to it. Roy Hodgson in charge of England had a choice of Wilf or Ricky Lambert. I’ll give you one guess who played more. Wilf got 8 minutes , out of position. That’s what he got to prove himself, guess he isn’t good enough too?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.