General Election 2017

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

General Election 2017

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 51 of 450 < 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 >

elgrande bedford 21 Apr 17 4.57pm
Originally posted by nickgusset I wrote that about the GE as a tongue in cheek remark. It's ok to close a school so people can be voted in to f*** up the education system but not ok to close a school to defend the education system. What about the children of the parents whose education will suffer a lot more if action isn't taken against the proposed staffing cuts? Here's details of one of the strikes. [Link] Having been involved in the campaign, it's fair to say that there is a lot of support from parents and the wider community. You can offer support on their facebook page [Link] So now the "fact" you stated that the nasty tories are selling the NHS to the Americans...link please. always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.
Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande

bedford 21 Apr 17 4.57pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I wrote that about the GE as a tongue in cheek remark. It's ok to close a school so people can be voted in to f*** up the education system but not ok to close a school to defend the education system.

What about the children of the parents whose education will suffer a lot more if action isn't taken against the proposed staffing cuts?
Here's details of one of the strikes.
[Link]

Having been involved in the campaign, it's fair to say that there is a lot of support from parents and the wider community.
You can offer support on their facebook page
[Link]

So now the "fact" you stated that the nasty tories are selling the NHS to the Americans...link please.

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Apr 17 4.57pm
All this stuff about growth. Is the man on the street really seeing the effects of this. More people employed than ever before. That may be so, lots down to more self employed, loads due to zero hours contracts (I know it suits some people). But no one ever mentions (when talking employment figures) that there is a bigger population, hence the increase in people working.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 21 Apr 17 4.57pm

All this stuff about growth. Is the man on the street really seeing the effects of this.

More people employed than ever before. That may be so, lots down to more self employed, loads due to zero hours contracts (I know it suits some people). But no one ever mentions (when talking employment figures) that there is a bigger population, hence the increase in people working.

Alert a moderator to this post

Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 21 Apr 17 5.02pm
Originally posted by nickgusset All this stuff about growth. Is the man on the street really seeing the effects of this. More people employed than ever before. That may be so, lots down to more self employed, loads due to zero hours contracts (I know it suits some people). But no one ever mentions (when talking employment figures) that there is a bigger population, hence the increase in people working. As i think Stirling said, they are not inherently bad, they just need working on. The gig economy and rise in internet businesses has changed the way we need to work as well as legislate (taxation etc). A lot of governments across the world of all political persuasions seem to be struggling with this. The answer isn't banning them out of hand but making sure that there is an element of protection too. the dignified don't even enter in the game
Alert a moderator to this post

Y Ddraig Goch

In The Crowd 21 Apr 17 5.02pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

All this stuff about growth. Is the man on the street really seeing the effects of this.

More people employed than ever before. That may be so, lots down to more self employed, loads due to zero hours contracts (I know it suits some people). But no one ever mentions (when talking employment figures) that there is a bigger population, hence the increase in people working.

As i think Stirling said, they are not inherently bad, they just need working on. The gig economy and rise in internet businesses has changed the way we need to work as well as legislate (taxation etc). A lot of governments across the world of all political persuasions seem to be struggling with this. The answer isn't banning them out of hand but making sure that there is an element of protection too.

the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 21 Apr 17 5.03pm
Originally posted by nickgusset All this stuff about growth. Is the man on the street really seeing the effects of this. More people employed than ever before. That may be so, lots down to more self employed, loads due to zero hours contracts (I know it suits some people). But no one ever mentions (when talking employment figures) that there is a bigger population, hence the increase in people working. The initial projections assumed that the Tories would have the balls to initiate clause 50 early, but they delayed a year. Just the £52 billion pound bill for leaving the EU will dent the figures, £52 billion I don't remember mentioned when we were giving £350 million a week to the NHS. BTW another May flip flop this time on IHT. "Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."
Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin

Where you have to have an English ... 21 Apr 17 5.03pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

All this stuff about growth. Is the man on the street really seeing the effects of this.

The initial projections assumed that the Tories would have the balls to initiate clause 50 early, but they delayed a year. Just the £52 billion pound bill for leaving the EU will dent the figures, £52 billion I don't remember mentioned when we were giving £350 million a week to the NHS.

BTW another May flip flop this time on IHT.

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande bedford 21 Apr 17 5.04pm
Originally posted by elgrande So now the "fact" you stated that the nasty tories are selling the NHS to the Americans...link please. I take it its the independent article (dated 26th January) where it clearly states the NHS will be free. always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.
Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande

bedford 21 Apr 17 5.04pm

Originally posted by elgrande

So now the "fact" you stated that the nasty tories are selling the NHS to the Americans...link please.

I take it its the independent article (dated 26th January) where it clearly states the NHS will be free.

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 21 Apr 17 5.09pm
Originally posted by elgrande So now the "fact" you stated that the nasty tories are selling the NHS to the Americans...link please. If you just look it is often mentioned when TTIP is brought up as an area the US want to "penetrate". [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] "Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."
Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin

Where you have to have an English ... 21 Apr 17 5.09pm

Originally posted by elgrande

So now the "fact" you stated that the nasty tories are selling the NHS to the Americans...link please.

If you just look it is often mentioned when TTIP is brought up as an area the US want to "penetrate".

[Link]

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 21 Apr 17 5.11pm
Originally posted by pefwin If you just look it is often mentioned when TTIP is brought up as an area the US want to "penetrate". [Link] [Link] ............................................... Oh they'll penetrate the NHS alright,if given a chance,as in completely fcuking it over! Edited by legaleagle (21 Apr 2017 5.11pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 21 Apr 17 5.14pm
Originally posted by legaleagle Originally posted by pefwin If you just look it is often mentioned when TTIP is brought up as an area the US want to "penetrate". [Link] [Link] ............................................... Oh they'll penetrate the NHS alright,if given a chance,as in completely fcuking it over! Edited by legaleagle (21 Apr 2017 5.11pm) Exactly my friend. "Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."
Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin

Where you have to have an English ... 21 Apr 17 5.14pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

Originally posted by pefwin

If you just look it is often mentioned when TTIP is brought up as an area the US want to "penetrate".

[Link]

...............................................

Oh they'll penetrate the NHS alright,if given a chance,as in completely fcuking it over!

Edited by legaleagle (21 Apr 2017 5.11pm)

Exactly my friend.

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande bedford 21 Apr 17 5.22pm
Originally posted by pefwin If you just look it is often mentioned when TTIP is brought up as an area the US want to "penetrate". [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] It's all conjecture,and on one of the links it said talks since 2008.....erm tories were not in power the. And it also say's in one that the NHS will remain free. always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.
Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande

bedford 21 Apr 17 5.22pm

Originally posted by pefwin

If you just look it is often mentioned when TTIP is brought up as an area the US want to "penetrate".

[Link]

It's all conjecture,and on one of the links it said talks since 2008.....erm tories were not in power the.
And it also say's in one that the NHS will remain free.

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 21 Apr 17 5.23pm
Originally posted by pefwin Exactly my friend. Peffers - what is your line of business? One cannot help but think that you are a capitalist by day and a hippie by night "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 21 Apr 17 5.23pm

Originally posted by pefwin

Exactly my friend.

Peffers - what is your line of business? One cannot help but think that you are a capitalist by day and a hippie by night

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

davenotamonkey 21 Apr 17 5.24pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 Kerala? Is that a country? Any success examples that we might have heard of? Venezuela, Venezuela? [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

davenotamonkey

21 Apr 17 5.24pm

Send a Private Message to davenotamonkey

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Kerala? Is that a country? Any success examples that we might have heard of?

Venezuela, Venezuela?
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 21 Apr 17 5.28pm
Originally posted by davenotamonkey The question put to the British people on the 8th June is: For Chancellor, choose between: - a PPE Oxford University graduate or, - a BSc in Government and Politics from Brunel University There are no other parties in this race for governance. So as snobbish as you sound (and lol, economics isn't exactly hardcore itself), the people essentially have this binary choice. If it's all the same to you, I'll take PPE over MaoDonnell and his little red book. Thats odd the new PM can choose anyone he/she wants her new cabinet can be entirely different.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 21 Apr 17 5.28pm

Originally posted by davenotamonkey

The question put to the British people on the 8th June is:

For Chancellor, choose between:
- a PPE Oxford University graduate or,
- a BSc in Government and Politics from Brunel University

There are no other parties in this race for governance. So as snobbish as you sound (and lol, economics isn't exactly hardcore itself), the people essentially have this binary choice.

If it's all the same to you, I'll take PPE over MaoDonnell and his little red book.

Thats odd the new PM can choose anyone he/she wants her new cabinet can be entirely different.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 51 of 450 < 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

General Election 2017

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors