This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
cryrst The garden of England 04 Jan 24 5.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
And to think that some people thought that Biden wouldn't run. [Tweet Link] I bet within 5 seconds of 0.32 he was sniffing her hair
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jan 24 5.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
I bet within 5 seconds of 0.32 he was sniffing her hair He should have been a hairdresser.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jan 24 5.42pm | |
---|---|
The reasons Alex Jones is hated by the elites isn't too hard to work out.....they come for anybody lifting the veil. [Tweet Link]
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Jan 24 6.53pm | |
---|---|
The reason Alex Jones is hated by anyone who is committed to the truth, whether elite or not, is that he is a liar who tries to profit from the gullibility of others. Those who seek to deny this are either fools, dangerous or both.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 04 Jan 24 7.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
And to think that some people thought that Biden wouldn't run. [Tweet Link] The nearest Biden gets to an extremist movement is in trying to find his way off a stage.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jan 24 11.57pm | |
---|---|
Alex Jones never had a problem with servicing gas appliances, so he's a lot better than some people we know.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jan 24 11.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The nearest Biden gets to an extremist movement is in trying to find his way off a stage. Not everyone who will vote for Biden will be a hair pervert, but all hair perverts will vote Biden.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 05 Jan 24 3.06am | |
---|---|
The guy who left pipe bombs in Capitol Hill at both Republican and Democrat headquarters on the night before Jan. 6 still hasn't been caught. Now that would be a person the Biden administration would actually be justified in jailing. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Jan 2024 3.06am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 05 Jan 24 3.30am | |
---|---|
Trump is going to sack them, and so of course being the left they have to times ten it and say he's going to get them killed instead. [Tweet Link]
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Jan 24 9.01am | |
---|---|
More deliberately misleading misinformation from Mike Benz which others just take at face value. We know the Trump “base” are gullible but are we really so naive? What Jack Smith pointed out was the potential impact of Trump being able to claim immunity from prosecution, as he is seeking. If legally established he could do anything without the risk of subsequent prosecution. That he might then use a State of the Union address to incite supporters was simply an extreme example of what could be possible. Not a forecast of what would happen. Note the edited clip which omits this! Elsewhere the Trump legal team are employing ever more dubious tactics to try to delay proceedings. Now they have requested the Judge to hold Smith in contempt for submitting documents whilst the case is on hold because of their appeal. Smith is trying to expedite the trial, they are trying to delay it until after the election when it would have to wait another 4 years if Trump succeeded. During which time he would doubtless pardon himself. It’s therefore little wonder Smith is pointing out the dangers of Trump’s claim succeeding:-
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 05 Jan 24 11.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
More deliberately misleading misinformation from Mike Benz which others just take at face value. We know the Trump “base” are gullible but are we really so naive? What Jack Smith pointed out was the potential impact of Trump being able to claim immunity from prosecution, as he is seeking. If legally established he could do anything without the risk of subsequent prosecution. That he might then use a State of the Union address to incite supporters was simply an extreme example of what could be possible. Not a forecast of what would happen. Note the edited clip which omits this! Elsewhere the Trump legal team are employing ever more dubious tactics to try to delay proceedings. Now they have requested the Judge to hold Smith in contempt for submitting documents whilst the case is on hold because of their appeal. Smith is trying to expedite the trial, they are trying to delay it until after the election when it would have to wait another 4 years if Trump succeeded. During which time he would doubtless pardon himself. It’s therefore little wonder Smith is pointing out the dangers of Trump’s claim succeeding:- Basically, there has always been a question of presidential immunity in the United States. I didn't see any of the others out murdering people but you never know.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Jan 24 1.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Basically, there has always been a question of presidential immunity in the United States. I didn't see any of the others out murdering people but you never know. Only though whilst in office. Trump is trying to extend that to cover ex-Presidents too.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.