You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tory conference
November 23 2024 1.16am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Tory conference

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 50 of 60 < 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 >

  

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Oct 17 3.39pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

Is there where the f from Theresa's backdrop finally landed?

That was rubbish.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 06 Oct 17 3.39pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

"'Racism' only exists in the minds of people who wish to use the concept for their own ends.
It's just that some are too dumb to see that."

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

That's the most insulting and stupid thing I think I've ever heard.


Why is it (i'm neither saying I agree or disagree btw).

I do think we're pre conditioned by mainstream thought police as to what to think and as such 'default' to the perceived wisdom ...however that doesnt mean it's correct...or does it?

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Oct 17 3.41pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger


.....

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (06 Oct 2017 3.41pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 06 Oct 17 3.41pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8


Hrolf doesn't believe in 'race' as it's a man-made identity term yet he will notice and say something about it, for example, when he observes that there are seemingly too many non-white newsreaders for some. Which is very odd and interesting.

Edited by Kermit8 (06 Oct 2017 2.19pm)

Do you mean 'ethinicty' instead of 'race' ?

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Oct 17 3.48pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle


92% though is higher than would be the case if benefit claimants were in direct proportion to society as a whole, which tells you that white Brits are MORE likely than non-whites and/or non-Brits to claim benefits. This is more likely to be the case in cities where migrants generally come to work so don't need to claim benefits. So saying that benefit claimants by and large are brown/immigrants is both untrue on an absolute level it's also untrue on a relative level.

That isn't really surprising is it. I don't know where The Hog is getting his info from so I can't comment beyond the general.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 06 Oct 17 3.48pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

That was rubbish.


Harsh. At least a 6.5/10.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Oct 17 3.54pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8


Hrolf doesn't believe in 'race' as it's a man-made identity term yet he will notice and say something about it, for example, when he observes that there are seemingly too many non-white newsreaders for some. Which is very odd and interesting.

Edited by Kermit8 (06 Oct 2017 2.19pm)

I think it is perfectly reasonable to note the disproportion of non whites in media and advertising, for example, in relation to the population. That also has nothing to do with 'racism'. It is a lot to do with creating an environmet of perceived inclusion and making money.

It's hard to discuss topics like this with people who have such simplistic views on such things. No offence.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Oct 17 3.56pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by DanH


Harsh. At least a 6.5/10.

If the Chuckle Brothers are 10.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Oct 17 4.12pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

Do you mean 'ethinicty' instead of 'race' ?

I'm not sure 'race' has much to do with anything even if you accept the term for the sake of simple reference.

Ethnicity? I don't even know what that means really. How do you define it scientifically?

I know that culture and religion often divide people and that people often have preconceptions of people based on their appearance or nationality which can be inaccurate or accurate.
Certainly if a certain group of people are perceived to be a threat or disadvantageous to you then you might resent them, but they could be anyone. Welsh, German,fat people, aliens. Not really about skin colour at all. That is just an easy reference because people generally like simplicity.
We don't tend to use complex considerations because it does not benefit us in an evolutionary sense. We tend to go with gut instinct, first impressions and previous personal experience.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 06 Oct 17 4.23pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

What's your source for your view? The majority of people old enough to be grandparents and great-grandparents in England would have been born in England. Do some family history research, look at old census returns, foreign birthplaces in the records are scarce.

Grandparents and great grandparents in England? I don't think that is the point now is it. You spoke of the Grandparents and Great Grandparents of people in England. We start with around 15% foreign born. So of the remaining 85% only a further 35% needs to have one great grandparent not born in the UK. And that is just one in eight of the grandparents.

Around a million Irish people emigrated during the Potato Famine at a time when the English population was around 6.5m.

Then we need to add in people with e.g. Jewish backgrounds following mass immigration from Russia and later to escape the Nazis and also other escapees from the Nazis from across Europe.

The various waves of post war immigration included people from Poland and Ukraine fleeing the Russians, then Indians and the Ugandan Indians (remember them?), Hungarians around 1956, Turkish Cypriots in the 1950s followed by Turks, pakistanis and West Indians in the 50s and 60s, Bangladeshis in the 70s.

All of these immigrants are old enough to have great grandchildren now.

I would suggest you look back through your own family tree but I just know it will be absolutely homogeneous. So I put you to proof, I don't have to. It was your assertion in the first place and it is you that seems absolutely fascinated by immigration as if it is some kind of new thing. Goodness knows how many of us have French or Viking ancestry if you go back far enough.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 06 Oct 17 4.38pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Grandparents and great grandparents in England? I don't think that is the point now is it. You spoke of the Grandparents and Great Grandparents of people in England. We start with around 15% foreign born. So of the remaining 85% only a further 35% needs to have one great grandparent not born in the UK. And that is just one in eight of the grandparents.

Around a million Irish people emigrated during the Potato Famine at a time when the English population was around 6.5m.

Then we need to add in people with e.g. Jewish backgrounds following mass immigration from Russia and later to escape the Nazis and also other escapees from the Nazis from across Europe.

The various waves of post war immigration included people from Poland and Ukraine fleeing the Russians, then Indians and the Ugandan Indians (remember them?), Hungarians around 1956, Turkish Cypriots in the 1950s followed by Turks, pakistanis and West Indians in the 50s and 60s, Bangladeshis in the 70s.

All of these immigrants are old enough to have great grandchildren now.

I would suggest you look back through your own family tree but I just know it will be absolutely homogeneous. So I put you to proof, I don't have to. It was your assertion in the first place and it is you that seems absolutely fascinated by immigration as if it is some kind of new thing. Goodness knows how many of us have French or Viking ancestry if you go back far enough.

It's highly likely that people of a certain age will have grandparents and great parents who are all English because of migration patterns. I have one Irish great great grandparent which is in line with historical migration and that is it. I know I have one Spanish ancestor from Cornwall and some Normans, who decend from 'Vikings', as many probably have.

None of this is particularly shocking. Migration just wasn't significnt until the last 20 years.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 06 Oct 17 5.09pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

It's highly likely that people of a certain age will have grandparents and great parents who are all English because of migration patterns. I have one Irish great great grandparent which is in line with historical migration and that is it. I know I have one Spanish ancestor from Cornwall and some Normans, who decend from 'Vikings', as many probably have.

None of this is particularly shocking. Migration just wasn't significnt until the last 20 years.

So I don't get my proof?

I think maybe a few ancient Britons, Scots, Saxons etc. may disagree with your point about significance. The Potato Famine must have been a shock to the system in its time.

By the way, at its peak the number of 'honour killings' in a year in the UK was 4. A minority of those would relate to people wanting to marry a non-Muslim, there are power freaks in every 'community' innit. I daresay the Krays killed more per year.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 50 of 60 < 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tory conference