It’s not myself who needs to think harder because that reasoning is illogical.

The murder wouldn’t be a conspiracy theory if there is evidence to prove the victim was deliberately killed. It would be a fact.

Why any jury acquits has no bearing on this.

Who the murderer was remains unproven until enough evidence is presented to convict. The murder remains a fact.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Agreed. I think the best thing would be for everyone to simply not respond to any of the postings however provocative they are.

It's somewhat telling that since this PM under went this serious attempt on his life....who knows just how serious.....there has been no mention of the serious threat of left wing extremism from the mainstream outlets who are more than willing to talk about threats from the right.

How strange....almost as though they only want set narratives.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

The only people who are foolish are those prepared to believe evidence free conspiracy theories. It’s only to be expected that such people, having distorted vision themselves, think that others appear foolish. My wife is an eye specialist. May she can offer some advice?

I read the story of the helicopter crash and instinctively looked for evidence of it not being an accident, as that would fit the narrative.

It’s very early days yet but so far I cannot see any. It apparently happened in a remote area in heavy fog so an accident seems the most likely explanation. A missile attack in a remote location seems improbable and along with a bomb would leave evidence, which would be discovered by crash investigation. Sabotage is possible but again would probably be found by the investigators.

Right now we don’t know and may never know.

What we do know is that anyone who thinks they are sure about the cause is being foolish.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

If you have evidence of the JFK assassination being a conspiracy I suggest it is delivered to the authorities asap.

However, I doubt that anyone has such evidence. All they have are rumours and assertions. Tonnes of rumours and assertions, repeatedly made and believed by millions doesn’t convert them into evidence. It just means there is a widely held belief in a conspiracy theory. It cannot be anything else, no matter how often it is claimed to be.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Anything that is verifiable as authentic proof of how and why it happened. Which given the elapsed time could now be difficult to obtain.

By the way if evidence did exist that proved your contentions then it would certainly have reached a media outlet prepared to publish it. There are many who would revel in such a scoop. They already enjoy publishing all the conspiracy theories.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.