We have a history of these types of players, is there an issue with our medical staff on board. Williams, tomkins, Wickham, Richards and now fergie

Took a gamble on a player with great potential who'd just suffered a bad injury.

I suspect its hard to predict that a player that young wouldn't recover from it.

Need to do the sensible thing now and move on.

There were far more sightings of Lord Lucan however.

I'm waiting for a cinematic, bond-villain-esque statement from Parish one day, off the back of some dramatic happenings at the Palace, where he swivels in a chair and ominously whispers "Nathan Ferguson? There never was a Nathan Ferguson".

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

When we first made plans to buy him a medical showed up something was wrong (knee I think) so we stalled & waited until the next window to finally take him from WBA, presumably we had enough time to do whatever discovery was necessary as regards whatever injury he was carrying - for us to have had him for almost 3 years with him spending so long in the treatment room one would assume that we wont be renewing his contract & any team that wanted to take him would be taking a serious risk / would struggle to get him almost any form of professional players insurance -

Even though Ferguson was (past tense) a talent, if we give him a extension to his Contract it would make a mockery of the Academy & of up & coming defenders in other leagues we could sign.
We have wasted enough money on this player, move him on.
I hope Richards is not going the same way as at least we have seen he can perform in the Prem & if he remains fit will be a great asset.

No, he hasn't.

He has been, is fit & available for selection. If the manager doesn't select him, thats not the players fault.

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.