This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 12 Jun 22 10.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bexley Eagle
He is what he is. I enjoy his radio show on the odd occasion I listen in. If you don’t like him don’t listen or watch. I really don’t see the need to rearrange his teeth with a sledgehammer but there you go. I agree, bloke can be a bit much, but then we all can... he has a good heart and it shows.. Back to cinch, I do think it looks a good logo on the shirt..
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
glaziermart 20 Jun 22 5.24pm | |
---|---|
Wonder if it might be the blue and white amateur kit?? Now we have changed the crest
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 20 Jun 22 5.59pm | |
---|---|
There's quite a good podcast you can find on BBC Sounds - I can't remember the name but it should be easy enough to find - that covers the business side of football and one of the recent episodes covered the question of new kits. Everything about the way kit launches are handled is designed to maximise incremental income and the whole timing of announcements is carefully calibrated to take into account the most effective way of increasing sales at the moment the kit is released. This can vary from club to club based on that club's supporters' historical purchasing behaviour. So a few clubs will announce a kit a month or two before it's available but most commonly, as it's the business model that generally works best, clubs won't announce anything until the kit has arrived in the shop and is ready to sell. Brentford's new kit (recycled bamboo apparently) is going to be used for two years. While this appears a magnanimous gesture towards supporters, Brentford can afford to do it because with a small-ish, local fan base their revenue from kit sales is a much lower percentage of total income than, say, at Manchester United. If the latter kept the same kit for two years, they'd forego a much larger chunk of revenue than Brentford. Also, the time it takes for the kit to arrive (and the cost it sells for) is mainly impacted by how bespoke it is. The cost of fabric is the biggest single expense but beyond that, most kits use standard collars, cuffs, etc. The more "small" unique elements that are included (shadowing, unique patterns, breathable mesh inserts, etc.) the longer the kit takes to produce and the later it arrives. On a more humorous note, shop employees are apparently trained to dissuade people of larger sizes from buying player-fit shirts though these are apparently now available in 5X sizes.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rikz Croydon 20 Jun 22 8.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sydtheeagle
There's quite a good podcast you can find on BBC Sounds - I can't remember the name but it should be easy enough to find - that covers the business side of football and one of the recent episodes covered the question of new kits. Everything about the way kit launches are handled is designed to maximise incremental income and the whole timing of announcements is carefully calibrated to take into account the most effective way of increasing sales at the moment the kit is released. This can vary from club to club based on that club's supporters' historical purchasing behaviour. So a few clubs will announce a kit a month or two before it's available but most commonly, as it's the business model that generally works best, clubs won't announce anything until the kit has arrived in the shop and is ready to sell. Brentford's new kit (recycled bamboo apparently) is going to be used for two years. While this appears a magnanimous gesture towards supporters, Brentford can afford to do it because with a small-ish, local fan base their revenue from kit sales is a much lower percentage of total income than, say, at Manchester United. If the latter kept the same kit for two years, they'd forego a much larger chunk of revenue than Brentford. Also, the time it takes for the kit to arrive (and the cost it sells for) is mainly impacted by how bespoke it is. The cost of fabric is the biggest single expense but beyond that, most kits use standard collars, cuffs, etc. The more "small" unique elements that are included (shadowing, unique patterns, breathable mesh inserts, etc.) the longer the kit takes to produce and the later it arrives. On a more humorous note, shop employees are apparently trained to dissuade people of larger sizes from buying player-fit shirts though these are apparently now available in 5X sizes. Don't understand how releasing next seasons kit as soon as the current season is finished is not beneficial to all clubs, I never buy tops as what's the point buying a shirt to get 3-5 weeks wear out of them, I'd definitely buy one if it was released in the middle of May as I'll get almost 4 months wear out of it. Must be so many fans who don't buy for this reason.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 21 Jun 22 4.34am | |
---|---|
It's true, get it out for the summer - get some PR done so people know it's the new shirt - I used to get it for Christmas as a kid and kinda realize 4 months later it's out of date. Here's an idea - if the shirt was say 60 quid, but we had it two years - how would that affect sales? I honestly am fine with a shirt over lapping, the Munich shirt was iconic and I think it's because we went up in it, then had a season in the prem with it. Now days I would rather buy a training top as that lasts way longer for me.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 21 Jun 22 7.18am | |
---|---|
For those that are less bothered about having the latest issue shirt & are more looking at value for money the Yellow away shirt has been on offer in the club shop for only £25.00 for the last maybe 3 or 4 weeks -
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
orpingtoneagle Orpington 21 Jun 22 6.00pm | |
---|---|
Been confirmed Macron is indeed the new kit supplier Bit disappointed as thought our recent Puma kits were better in terms of quality and style.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 21 Jun 22 6.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by orpingtoneagle
Been confirmed Macron is indeed the new kit supplier Bit disappointed as thought our recent Puma kits were better in terms of quality and style. Oh for f*** sake. I sincerely hope there’s no truth in this. I wouldn’t get macron in for the local U11’s
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 21 Jun 22 6.09pm | |
---|---|
Just got the Instagram notification. B****cks
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Palace 1979 Surrey 21 Jun 22 9.44pm | |
---|---|
I would love a return to Adidas but I think that might now be a pipe dream. I just hope the macron kit is a better quality and design than their past efforts.
Some people are like Slinkies … not really good for anything, but you can’t help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Laboureagle becknham 22 Jun 22 7.45pm | |
---|---|
Did we get to the 2016 cup final in Macron?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Phill 23 Jun 22 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Yes the 2016 cup final kit was Macron. Very good as well
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.