This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Matov 12 Jan 22 8.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Boris Johnson has in the past been described as a "greased albino piglet". He might well be cornered in a cul-de-sac with the butchers whetting their knives. This is the gravest,most serious crisis he has faced since becoming PM. Edited by Willo (12 Jan 2022 10.20am) And all not only preventable but proof of a moronic hubris that beggars belief. He has to go after this. I confess that when these stories started, I just dismissed them and assumed that Johnson would ride it out, just like he always has. But now...he has to go because he is clearly as thick as s***. Anybody who thought this kind of event was A: A good idea and B: Would not be exposed is simply not fit to run a bath, let alone a country. Why on earth would anybody have even considered such a crass and offensive act when people could not say goodbye to loved ones on their death beds, nor attend funerals, were canceling weddings and prevented from seeing their friends? And yet they all decide to enjoy some drinks and nibbles with each other? It was a staggeringly stupid decision. This goes beyond party politics, it really does.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 12 Jan 22 8.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
A populist government would restore the death penalty just because they knew it would be popular, whilst in their hearts knowing it was morally indefensible. Why is it 'morally indefensible'.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 12 Jan 22 8.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not at all. The majority always wins. Referendums are not though part of our democracy. Parliament is sovereign and only it can act. There were legitimate reasons to protest the way the Brexit process unfolded, to demand that the revelations of the security forces be taken seriously. Election laws were broken. No referendum on such a crucial issue is binding on a UK Parliament. Parliament had the power to act, but failed to do so, even though their collective judgement was in favour of staying in, So the 52:48 majority is not the issue. It's a red herring. It's the use of a referendum by a populist government and the failure of Parliament, especially by the opposition leader Corbyn, to stand up and be counted which is. Brexit was a failure of British democracy. Not a triumph. You portray the UK being in the eu since its inception as a country. We were in for 40 odd years the UK is 1000s of years old. A change is as good as a rest and we are resting from all the red tape.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Jan 22 8.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This spectacularly misses the point. Whilst every politician needs to be aware of public reaction and put a positive spin on things that doesn't mean all policies are populist. Populism is far from a "ridiculous phrase". That's just an excuse. Populism is a political reality. We have seen it in both the USA and in the UK. Whilst responsible, moral, politicians lead, populists follow. They adopt policies that win them elections and keep them in power, even when they know they harm the people they serve. It is not necessarily a right wing phenomenon, although in recent experience it has come from the right. Leftish populism is perfectly possible. A populist government would restore the death penalty just because they knew it would be popular, whilst in their hearts knowing it was morally indefensible. Populism is morally bankrupt and a very dangerous road for any democratic country to take. The sooner it is abandoned the better. Maybe Johnson's removal will pave a new road ahead. It's just a word used by people like you to decry a majority opinion that differs from their minority opinion. You can spin all you like. I have no idea why you use such a stupid example as the death penalty, as I doubt the majority would be in favour of it in 2022.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 12 Jan 22 8.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
It's just a word used by people like you to decry a majority opinion that differs from their minority opinion. You can spin all you like. I have no idea why you use such a stupid example as the death penalty, as I doubt the majority would be in favour of it in 2022. That would depend on the crime and proof of commiting said crime really.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Jan 22 10.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Why is it 'morally indefensible'. I am not a Christian, but we all live in a country in which our morality has been established by Christian values. Christians are commanded not to kill. To do so is morally indefensible in any circumstances.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Jan 22 10.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
And all not only preventable but proof of a moronic hubris that beggars belief. He has to go after this. I confess that when these stories started, I just dismissed them and assumed that Johnson would ride it out, just like he always has. But now...he has to go because he is clearly as thick as s***. Anybody who thought this kind of event was A: A good idea and B: Would not be exposed is simply not fit to run a bath, let alone a country. Why on earth would anybody have even considered such a crass and offensive act when people could not say goodbye to loved ones on their death beds, nor attend funerals, were canceling weddings and prevented from seeing their friends? And yet they all decide to enjoy some drinks and nibbles with each other? It was a staggeringly stupid decision. This goes beyond party politics, it really does. I agree. I am just glad that others are now realising what a plonker this man really is. He is living evidence that you can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time but not all of the people all of the time. His time is up. Give him his hat and a Boris bike to anywhere but Downing St.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 12 Jan 22 10.55pm | |
---|---|
Nope. No way Boris is going anywhere soon. They’re now rallying round him. Laughable I know. But fact. He won’t be walking. Not sure he’s all there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Jan 22 11.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
It's just a word used by people like you to decry a majority opinion that differs from their minority opinion. You can spin all you like. I have no idea why you use such a stupid example as the death penalty, as I doubt the majority would be in favour of it in 2022. I have given a reasoned explanation of what populism involves. There's no "spin" there at all. You just don't like being presented with uncomfortable facts. I used the death penalty example because it's one where there has traditionally been a wide gap between what the public want and what the politicians deliver. In the UK the support for the death penalty was as high as 65% in favour less than a decade ago but has since declined to below 50%. So a populist government now would not introduce it, whilst 10 years ago they may well have done. Those decisions not based on any moral judgements of right, or wrong, but solely on delivering what is popular, which in turn keeps them in power. This isn't leadership. It's pandering to popular opinion. Which is a foolish way to run a country.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 12 Jan 22 11.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
And all not only preventable but proof of a moronic hubris that beggars belief. He has to go after this. I confess that when these stories started, I just dismissed them and assumed that Johnson would ride it out, just like he always has. But now...he has to go because he is clearly as thick as s***. Anybody who thought this kind of event was A: A good idea and B: Would not be exposed is simply not fit to run a bath, let alone a country. Why on earth would anybody have even considered such a crass and offensive act when people could not say goodbye to loved ones on their death beds, nor attend funerals, were canceling weddings and prevented from seeing their friends? And yet they all decide to enjoy some drinks and nibbles with each other? It was a staggeringly stupid decision. This goes beyond party politics, it really does. Well done. Regardless of political persuasion, if some are so aligned with a party that they're willing to look the other way when something as utterly disgraceful as this takes place, then they may as well just confess that they've been brainwashed beyond the point of principle. I can't see myself voting for any major party next election, but even if I had considered voting for this lot, there would be no way I'd be doing it now. Or at minimum all of those who were knocking back drinks at their endless 'works events' while others had to let their loved ones die alone and were not allowed to attend their funerals would have to go.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CPFC1965 Warrington 12 Jan 22 11.39pm | |
---|---|
The most likely source for all these shenanigans is Cummings. Boris may appear to be a buffoon, but you don't get to achieve what he has done, in political life, by being stupid. Can you possibly imagine the dirt he has on others within his party and I guess that is why his cabinet are circling the wagons. Labour have finally got him on the ropes and I am expecting that they call for a series of public inquiries, chaired by retired Labour mp's to investigate. I hope he calls a snap General Election. If the Conservatives lose he skips into private life with the prospect of millions at his finger tips, from writing his memoirs etc and if they win, well adieu to the Labour party. Win win for Boris, lose lose for conservatives and labour.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wilesy01 Bristol 12 Jan 22 11.45pm | |
---|---|
All Tory MSPs are backing their leader Douglas Ross in asking the PM to resign. At a time where the SNP are clamouring for a second Indy ref do the conservatives really want that sort of disunity north of the border? Jacob Rees Mogg calling Ross a 'lightweight' on Newsnight is hardly going to help things either! Is Johnson really more important than any of the long term aspects of the party or the Union?!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.