This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 15 Apr 21 9.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I was 29 and so far as I recall it was pretty plain sailing and regarded by most as a golden opportunity. Only those who regarded it as "us giving up our Sovereignty" seemed unhappy, and they went on being unhappy until Brexit. It was always a fake argument with only emotional consequences but there are still those who put such things above the welfare and prosperity of their fellow citizens. I know which side of this argument Shirley Williams stood on and with her passing we have lost another voice of reason. Now we are likely to witness the break-up of the UK, which would probably have been avoided without Brexit. Is that really a price worth paying? Political systems evolve to suit altered environments and all I ever saw from the Brexiteers was fear of progress, rather than an embrace of it. Baroness Williams must have viewed the last few years with great sadness. The Scottish independence referendum was in 2014, so don't think you can blame the break-up of the UK on Brexit. That they had a referendum is proof of unrest in the union.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Apr 21 8.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The system was pretty shonky in the 70’s when it was a miserable experience for all involved. Streaming meant a lot of kids were more or less abandoned. CSEs were a waste of time. I attended a "secondary modern" school before comprehensives were introduced. I "failed" the 11+ as my parents wanted as they couldn't afford the uniform and the expectations of the grammar school. When I was a child kids like me didn't go to grammar school. They were for "posh" kids and not for those of us who lived in council houses. It continued when I reached 16 and my headmaster wanted me to go on to further education and then to University. My mother wanted me to earn, so I went to work. I ended up doing OK but I often wonder whether I would have done even better had those chances been on offer. So this question has to be considered in the round and whether, on balance, the greatest number achieve the greater good via a comprehensive or selective system. My own experiences inform my opinion.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Apr 21 8.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
The Scottish independence referendum was in 2014, so don't think you can blame the break-up of the UK on Brexit. That they had a referendum is proof of unrest in the union. Unrest which was rejected. In the EU referendum the Scots voted overwhelmingly to remain and it's this which appears to have swung the balance.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 16 Apr 21 8.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I attended a "secondary modern" school before comprehensives were introduced. I "failed" the 11+ as my parents wanted as they couldn't afford the uniform and the expectations of the grammar school. When I was a child kids like me didn't go to grammar school. They were for "posh" kids and not for those of us who lived in council houses. It continued when I reached 16 and my headmaster wanted me to go on to further education and then to University. My mother wanted me to earn, so I went to work. I ended up doing OK but I often wonder whether I would have done even better had those chances been on offer. So this question has to be considered in the round and whether, on balance, the greatest number achieve the greater good via a comprehensive or selective system. My own experiences inform my opinion. My experience was pretty similar.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 16 Apr 21 8.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I attended a "secondary modern" school before comprehensives were introduced. I "failed" the 11+ as my parents wanted as they couldn't afford the uniform and the expectations of the grammar school. When I was a child kids like me didn't go to grammar school. They were for "posh" kids and not for those of us who lived in council houses. It continued when I reached 16 and my headmaster wanted me to go on to further education and then to University. My mother wanted me to earn, so I went to work. I ended up doing OK but I often wonder whether I would have done even better had those chances been on offer. So this question has to be considered in the round and whether, on balance, the greatest number achieve the greater good via a comprehensive or selective system. My own experiences inform my opinion. I went to Wisbech Grammar for free. I'm from a single parent household and council flat. My scholarship was a Tory initiative. I thought there was a series about kids doing this today? Can't remember what it was called 'The Test' perhaps? I didn't used to fit in, but it was an excellent school. Gave me my first taste of Rugby, Cricket and Latin. Edited by ASCPFC (16 Apr 2021 8.57pm)
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 16 Apr 21 10.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Unrest which was rejected. In the EU referendum the Scots voted overwhelmingly to remain and it's this which appears to have swung the balance. EU referendum Scotland result wasn't as overwhelming as you seem to think. About half a million (500k) votes separated the outcome out of the circa 4 million voters. 67% of voters turned out. Scottish independence referendum was even closer, with the difference less than 400k, but almost 85% turnout. It appears that Scottish people were less concerned about EU membership than UK membership. So to try and pin the break-up of the UK on Brexit is somewhat remiss. An awful lot of the Scots are, and always were, anti English. They loathe Westminster and see English politicians as upper class toffs. Many have, quite rightly, stronger connections to Ireland than to England. It's an ancestry and a religious split, as it is in NI. So if you want to pin the break-up on anything, look no further than the church.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 17 Apr 21 6.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
EU referendum Scotland result wasn't as overwhelming as you seem to think. About half a million (500k) votes separated the outcome out of the circa 4 million voters. 67% of voters turned out. Scottish independence referendum was even closer, with the difference less than 400k, but almost 85% turnout. It appears that Scottish people were less concerned about EU membership than UK membership. So to try and pin the break-up of the UK on Brexit is somewhat remiss. An awful lot of the Scots are, and always were, anti English. They loathe Westminster and see English politicians as upper class toffs. Many have, quite rightly, stronger connections to Ireland than to England. It's an ancestry and a religious split, as it is in NI. So if you want to pin the break-up on anything, look no further than the church. Are you suggesting that because they have stronger cultural ties with another country they should leave the union?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 17 Apr 21 7.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
My experience was pretty similar. Yup in my school that lot were the gardening and pottery club, I kid you not. Oddly enough the rest of us swots envied them at the time as they were always outside and having a good time. Still in the long run....
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 17 Apr 21 9.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Yup in my school that lot were the gardening and pottery club, I kid you not. Oddly enough the rest of us swots envied them at the time as they were always outside and having a good time. Still in the long run.... ...they became landscape architects and ceramics experts? Probably not.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 17 Apr 21 10.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Are you suggesting that because they have stronger cultural ties with another country they should leave the union? I'm not suggesting anything. How did you come to that conclusion? Did you understand that my point was about blaming Brexit for the break-up of the UK, (which isn't currently on the cards)? I think the pipes are calling you
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.